Literature DB >> 33216982

Faculty perceptions of virtual reality as an alternative solution for preclinical skills during the pandemic.

Cortino Sukotjo1, Stephanie Schreiber1, Judy Chia-Chun Yuan1, Markus Santoso2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33216982      PMCID: PMC7753732          DOI: 10.1002/jdd.12499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Educ        ISSN: 0022-0337            Impact factor:   2.264


× No keyword cloud information.

PROBLEM

The COVID‐19 pandemic has created an historic and significant disruption of education systems worldwide. Many dental institutions were forced to close and suspend their preclinical curricular and clinical activities. There are many options which comply with social distancing in reducing the transmission of diseases . The current pandemic crisis highlights the need for an alternative solution for preclinical dental education to prepare students with psychomotor skills in a safe and viable environment. This crisis has stimulated innovation in the pedagogic methodology. Virtual reality (VR)‐based simulation has been commonly used in medical education to improve the clinical skills and students’ self‐confidence. , , However, the use of virtual reality in predoctoral dental education is still limited and needs to be explored further. Both learners’ and teachers’ perspectives are critical for this pedagogy to be successful. The dental faculty's mindset and adaptation to this novel technology is essential to support this revolutionized pedagogy, particularly with the Millennial generation, and in this challenging time. Therefore, this qualitative study aimed to evaluate the dental faculty's perceptions of using VR for teaching.

SOLUTION

Our research group has developed an immersive VR program for dental implant surgery training using Oculus Quest (Figure 1). This VR technology offers the potential to revolutionize dental education. Predoctoral faculty's perception regarding this novel educational pedagogy was investigated. Ten faculty members (6 prosthodontists, 2 periodontists, and 2 general dentists) participated in the study to assess the application and subsequently a focus group discussion (FGD). FGD questions aimed to address 4 domains: opinions about the immersive experiences, the advantages and disadvantages of this project, features to add or delete on this project, and the future of dental education using VR. A short orientation on maneuvering the Oculus Quest was conducted before the study. The IRB office approved the study.
FIGURE 1

Virtual reality for dental implant surgery

Virtual reality for dental implant surgery

RESULTS

All faculty enjoyed the immersive experiences and commented that the virtual set‐up provides a holistic and realistic view of a dental operatory for students. Several faculty worried that this VR exercise might provide a false sense of confidence for learners. Most of the faculty agreed that this pedagogy offers 24/7 access for the students to perform virtual rehearsal, particularly meeting the demand of the Millennials. All faculty recommended a better ergonomic positioning, correct hand grasp of the instruments, better tactile response, and more appropriate tools to maneuver the application instead of the Quest controller. All advocated multi‐user function, where both learner and teacher can be in the same VR room to assess and provide rapid feedback to the learners. Several faculty had recommended the magnifying function of the anatomical structure to provide better viewing. None of the faculty reported motion sickness from using the apps. All faculty also believed that this novel pedagogy is beneficial and can promote student engagement and participation, especially during this challenging time. All acknowledged this tool to be supplemental to traditional pedagogy. The rich descriptions of faculty beliefs and perceptions presented in this study will be of interest to dental educators considering VR adoption in the future of dental education.
  5 in total

Review 1.  Virtual reality-based simulators for spine surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michael Pfandler; Marc Lazarovici; Philipp Stefan; Patrick Wucherer; Matthias Weigl
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 4.166

2.  An innovative virtual reality training tool for orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Y Pulijala; M Ma; M Pears; D Peebles; A Ayoub
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 2.789

3.  Effectiveness of Immersive Virtual Reality in Surgical Training-A Randomized Control Trial.

Authors:  Yeshwanth Pulijala; Minhua Ma; Matthew Pears; David Peebles; Ashraf Ayoub
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  Virtual education: Dental morphologies in a virtual teaching environment.

Authors:  Anja Liebermann; Kurt Erdelt
Journal:  J Dent Educ       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 2.264

5.  Faculty perceptions of virtual reality as an alternative solution for preclinical skills during the pandemic.

Authors:  Cortino Sukotjo; Stephanie Schreiber; Judy Chia-Chun Yuan; Markus Santoso
Journal:  J Dent Educ       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 2.264

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Faculty perceptions of virtual reality as an alternative solution for preclinical skills during the pandemic.

Authors:  Cortino Sukotjo; Stephanie Schreiber; Judy Chia-Chun Yuan; Markus Santoso
Journal:  J Dent Educ       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 2.264

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.