Literature DB >> 33216908

Attitudes of Homebound Older Adults and Their Caregivers Toward Research and Participation as Research Advisors.

Ashley L Eaton England1,2, Christine S Ritchie3, Alexandria Mickler4,5, Carla M Perissinotto1, Sarah K Garrigues1, Bruce Leff4, Orla C Sheehan4, Krista L Harrison1,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Homebound older adults and their caregivers have not historically been engaged as advisors in patient-centered outcomes research. This study aimed to understand the attitudes of homebound older adults and their caregivers toward research and participation as research advisors. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Descriptive thematic analysis of semistructured interviews conducted with 30 homebound older adults and caregivers recruited from home-based medical care practices. Interview questions addressed opinions on research and preferences for engaging as research advisors.
RESULTS: Of 30 participants, 22 were female, 17 were people of color, and 11 had Medicaid. Two themes emerged related to perceptions of research overall: (a) utility of research and (b) relevance of research. Overall, participants reported positive attitudes toward research and felt that research could affect people like them. Three themes emerged related to participating as research advisors: (a) motivators, (b) barriers, and (c) preferences. Participants were open to engaging in a variety of activities as research advisors. Most participants were motivated by helping others. Common barriers included time constraints and caregiving responsibilities, and physical barriers for homebound individuals. Participants also reported fears such as lacking the skills or expertise to contribute as advisors. Many were willing to participate if these barriers were accommodated and shared their communication preferences. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Diverse homebound older adults and caregivers are willing to be engaged as research advisors and provided information to inform future engagement strategies. Findings can inform efforts to meet new age-inclusive requirements of the National Institutes of Health.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Home-based medical care; Patient and caregiver perspective; Patient-centered research; Qualitative study

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33216908      PMCID: PMC8679039          DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnaa189

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gerontologist        ISSN: 0016-9013


  26 in total

1.  African Americans and Clinical Research: Evidence Concerning Barriers and Facilitators to Participation and Recruitment Recommendations.

Authors:  Travonia B Hughes; Vijay R Varma; Corinne Pettigrew; Marilyn S Albert
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2017-04-01

2.  Trends in physician house calls to Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Lars E Peterson; Steven H Landers; Andrew Bazemore
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.657

Review 3.  Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jo Brett; Sophie Staniszewska; Carole Mockford; Sandra Herron-Marx; John Hughes; Colin Tysall; Rashida Suleman
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Strategies to support recruitment of patients with life-limiting illness for research: the Palliative Care Research Cooperative Group.

Authors:  Laura C Hanson; Janet Bull; Kathryn Wessell; Lisa Massie; Rachael E Bennett; Jean S Kutner; Noreen M Aziz; Amy Abernethy
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 3.612

5.  A Quality of Care Framework for Home-Based Medical Care.

Authors:  Christine S Ritchie; Bruce Leff; Sarah K Garrigues; Carla Perissinotto; Orla C Sheehan; Krista L Harrison
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 4.669

6.  Epidemiology of the Homebound Population in the United States.

Authors:  Katherine A Ornstein; Bruce Leff; Kenneth E Covinsky; Christine S Ritchie; Alex D Federman; Laken Roberts; Amy S Kelley; Albert L Siu; Sarah L Szanton
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 7.  A systematic review of reasons for gatekeeping in palliative care research.

Authors:  Marijke C Kars; Ghislaine Jmw van Thiel; Rieke van der Graaf; Marleen Moors; Alexander de Graeff; Johannes Jm van Delden
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 4.762

8.  Conceptual and practical foundations of patient engagement in research at the patient-centered outcomes research institute.

Authors:  Lori Frank; Laura Forsythe; Lauren Ellis; Suzanne Schrandt; Sue Sheridan; Jason Gerson; Kristen Konopka; Sarah Daugherty
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  A Patient-Centered Approach to Comparative Effectiveness Research Focused on Older Adults: Lessons From the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.

Authors:  Noah R Mason; Harold C Sox; Evelyn P Whitlock
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2018-12-26       Impact factor: 5.562

10.  What motivates patients and caregivers to engage in health research and how engagement affects their lives: Qualitative survey findings.

Authors:  Rachel Hemphill; Laura P Forsythe; Andrea L Heckert; Andrew Amolegbe; Maureen Maurer; Kristin L Carman; Rikki Mangrum; Lisa Stewart; Ninma Fearon; Laura Esmail
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 3.377

View more
  1 in total

1.  A Home-Based Care Research Agenda by and for Homebound Older Adults and Caregivers.

Authors:  Bruce Leff; Orla C Sheehan; Krista L Harrison; Ashley Eaton England; Alex Mickler; Pragyashree Sharma Basyal; Sarah K Garrigues; Mattan Schuchman; Carla Perissinotto; Sarah B Garrett; Christine S Ritchie
Journal:  J Appl Gerontol       Date:  2021-04-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.