| Literature DB >> 33216286 |
Huasong Wang1,2, Linlin Liu1,2, Mo Gou1,2, Guian Huang1,2, Chenglei Tian1,2, Jiao Yang1,2, Haiying Wang1,2, Qin Xu3, Guo Liang Xu3,4, Lin Liu5,6.
Abstract
Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33216286 PMCID: PMC8225707 DOI: 10.1007/s13238-020-00805-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Protein Cell ISSN: 1674-800X Impact factor: 14.870
Figure 1knockout causes subfertility and impairs oocyte and early embryo development. (A) Average litter size of wild-type (WT) and Tet2 knockout (Tet2−/−) female mice at three different ages (young, 2–4 months; middle-age, 7–9 months; old, 10–12 months). n > 10 for successfully mated female mice for young and middle-age group and n ≥ 8 mice for old group are pooled. Each spot in round (blue) or square (green) shape represents the number of pups delivered from a successfully mated female mouse. (B) Representative images of superovulated oocytes from WT and Tet2 female mice at three different ages. Scale bar, 100 μm. (C) Comparison of oocyte yield per mouse (top) and percentage of the first polar body extrusion (bottom). n = 4–6 mice per group. (D) Representative images of oocytes stained with α-Tubulin antibody (green) and DAPI (blue) from three different age groups. Scale bar, 10 μm. (E) Spindle and chromosome abnormal rate between WT and Tet2−/− oocytes from three different age groups. n = 3–4 mice per group. (F) Morphology of embryo development at 2-cell (24 h), morula (72 h) and blastocyst (96 h) stage following in vitro fertilization of oocytes. Oocytes were obtained from WT and Tet2 mice from young or old group and sperm from healthy ICR male mice. (G) Percentage of developed blastocysts or blastocyst hatching rate 96 h after in vitro fertilization from young and old oocytes. n = 3–5 mice, and about 50 blastocysts were counted for each group. The bars indicate mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ns, no significant difference
Figure 2Differential gene expression of and WT oocytes. (A) PCA analysis of young WT (n = 24), Tet2−/− (n = 16), old WT (n = 22) and Tet2−/− (n = 16) oocytes using the CPM for all genes from 2–3 mice. (B) Pheatmap showing differential gene expression of young WT, Tet2−/−, old WT and Tet2−/− oocytes. (C) Barplot showing the enrichment of genes highly expressed in young WT oocytes but lowly expressed in other groups. X-axis represents the corrected p-value (FDR) using Benjamini and Hochberg. (D) Pheatmap showing genes enriched in actin cytoskeleton after Tet2 knockout. (E) Venn diagram of upregulated and downregulated genes in young and old Tet2−/− oocytes, compared with WT oocytes. (F) Pheatmap showing genes upregulated and downregulated in both Tet2−/− young and old oocytes. (G) Bar plot illustrating the enrichment of genes upregulated or downregulated after Tet2 knockout. X-axis represented the corrected p-value (FDR) using Benjamini and Hochberg. (H) Representative images of oocytes co-stained with F-actin and α-Tubulin by immunofluorescence microscopy. Scale bar, 10 μm. Right panel, Relative expression F-actin level by quantification of immunofluorescence intensity averaged from various oocytes using Image J (n = 5–7)