Literature DB >> 33211818

Development of Neural Response to Novel Sounds in Fragile X Syndrome: Potential Biomarkers.

Lauren Ethridge1, Andrew Thaliath2, Jeremy Kraff2, Karan Nijhawan2, Elizabeth Berry-Kravis2.   

Abstract

Auditory processing abnormalities in fragile X syndrome (FXS) may contribute to difficulties with language development, pattern identification, and contextual updating. Participants with FXS (N = 41) and controls (N = 27) underwent auditory event-related potentials during presentation of an oddball paradigm. Data was adequate for analysis for 33 participants with FXS and 27 controls (age 4-51 y, 13 females [FXS]; 4-54 y, 11 females [control]). Participants with FXS showed larger N1 and P2 amplitudes, abnormal lack of modulation of P1 and P2 amplitudes and P2 latency in response to oddball stimuli ) relative to controls: Females with FXS were more similar to controls. Participants with FXS showed a marginal speeding of the P2 latency, suggesting potentiation to oddball stimuli rather than habituation. Participants with FXS showed a heightened N1 habituation effect compared to controls. Gamma power was significantly higher for participants with FXS. Groups did not differ on mismatch negativity. Both controls and participants with FXS showed similar developmental trajectories in P1 and N1 amplitude, P2 latency, and gamma power, but not for P2 amplitude. One month retest analyses performed in 14 participants suggest strong test-retest reliability for most measures. Individuals with FXS show previously demonstrated increased response amplitude and high frequency neural activity. Despite an overall normal developmental trajectory for most measures, individuals with FXS show age-independent but gender-dependent decreases in complex processing of novel stimuli. Many markers show strong retest reliability even in children and thus are potential biomarkers for clinical trials in FXS. ©AAIDD.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG; ERP; auditory; development; fragile x syndrome; mismatch negativity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33211818      PMCID: PMC8631234          DOI: 10.1352/1944-7558-125.6.449

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Intellect Dev Disabil        ISSN: 1944-7558


  51 in total

Review 1.  A theory of cortical responses.

Authors:  Karl Friston
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-04-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Dissociation of temporal and frontal components in the human auditory N1 wave: a scalp current density and dipole model analysis.

Authors:  M H Giard; F Perrin; J F Echallier; M Thévenet; J C Froment; J Pernier
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-05

3.  Test-retest reliability of the magnetic mismatch negativity response to sound duration and omission deviants.

Authors:  Marc Recasens; Peter J Uhlhaas
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Language Skills of Males with Fragile X Syndrome or Nonsyndromic Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  Angela John Thurman; Andrea McDuffie; Randi J Hagerman; Cynde K Josol; Leonard Abbeduto
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2017-03

5.  Augmentation of auditory N1 in children with fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Maija Castrén; Ari Pääkkönen; Ina M Tarkka; Markku Ryynänen; Juhani Partanen
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.020

6.  Matrix metalloproteinase-9 deletion rescues auditory evoked potential habituation deficit in a mouse model of Fragile X Syndrome.

Authors:  Jonathan W Lovelace; Teresa H Wen; Sarah Reinhard; Mike S Hsu; Harpreet Sidhu; Iryna M Ethell; Devin K Binder; Khaleel A Razak
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 5.996

7.  Language development in school-age girls with fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  A Sterling; L Abbeduto
Journal:  J Intellect Disabil Res       Date:  2012-06-08

8.  The functional anatomy of the MMN: a DCM study of the roving paradigm.

Authors:  Marta I Garrido; Karl J Friston; Stefan J Kiebel; Klaas E Stephan; Torsten Baldeweg; James M Kilner
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Gamma oscillations as a neural signature of shifting times in narrative language.

Authors:  Sanne Gøren Brederoo; Laura Simone Bos; Olga Dragoy; Roelien Bastiaanse; Giosuè Baggio
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A developmental, longitudinal investigation of autism phenotypic profiles in fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Michelle Lee; Gary E Martin; Elizabeth Berry-Kravis; Molly Losh
Journal:  J Neurodev Disord       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 4.025

View more
  5 in total

1.  Independent evaluation of the harvard automated processing pipeline for Electroencephalography 1.0 using multi-site EEG data from children with Fragile X Syndrome.

Authors:  Emma Auger; Elizabeth M Berry-Kravis; Lauren E Ethridge
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  Looking for consistency in an uncertain world: test-retest reliability of neurophysiological and behavioral readouts in autism.

Authors:  Shlomit Beker; John J Foxe; John Venticinque; Juliana Bates; Elizabeth M Ridgeway; Roseann C Schaaf; Sophie Molholm
Journal:  J Neurodev Disord       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 4.025

Review 3.  EEG as a translational biomarker and outcome measure in fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Aisling Kenny; Damien Wright; Andrew C Stanfield
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 6.222

4.  EEG Signal Complexity Is Reduced During Resting-State in Fragile X Syndrome.

Authors:  Mélodie Proteau-Lemieux; Inga Sophia Knoth; Kristian Agbogba; Valérie Côté; Hazel Maridith Barlahan Biag; Angela John Thurman; Charles-Olivier Martin; Anne-Marie Bélanger; Cory Rosenfelt; Flora Tassone; Leonard J Abbeduto; Sébastien Jacquemont; Randi Hagerman; François Bolduc; David Hessl; Andrea Schneider; Sarah Lippé
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 4.157

5.  Absence of the Fragile X messenger ribonucleoprotein alters response patterns to sounds in the auditory midbrain.

Authors:  Jérémie Sibille; Jens Kremkow; Ursula Koch
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 5.152

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.