Shlomit Beker1,2, John J Foxe1,2,3, John Venticinque4, Juliana Bates1, Elizabeth M Ridgeway1, Roseann C Schaaf5, Sophie Molholm6,7,8,9. 1. The Cognitive Neurophysiology Laboratory, Department of Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA. 2. Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA. 3. The Cognitive Neurophysiology Laboratory, The Ernest J. Del Monte Institute for Neuroscience, Department of Neuroscience, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA. 4. School of Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA. 5. Department of Occupational Therapy, Jefferson College of Health Professions Faculty, Farber Institute for Neurosciences Thomas Jefferson University Philadelphia, Philadelphia, USA. 6. The Cognitive Neurophysiology Laboratory, Department of Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA. sophie.molholm@einsteinmed.org. 7. Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA. sophie.molholm@einsteinmed.org. 8. The Cognitive Neurophysiology Laboratory, The Ernest J. Del Monte Institute for Neuroscience, Department of Neuroscience, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA. sophie.molholm@einsteinmed.org. 9. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA. sophie.molholm@einsteinmed.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are associated with altered sensory processing and perception. Scalp recordings of electrical brain activity time-locked to sensory events (event-related potentials; ERPs) provide precise information on the time-course of related altered neural activity, and can be used to model the cortical loci of the underlying neural networks. Establishing the test-retest reliability of these sensory brain responses in ASD is critical to their use as biomarkers of neural dysfunction in this population. METHODS: EEG and behavioral data were acquired from 33 children diagnosed with ASD aged 6-9.4 years old, while they performed a child-friendly task at two different time-points, separated by an average of 5.2 months. In two blocked conditions, participants responded to the occurrence of an auditory target that was either preceded or not by repeating visual stimuli. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to assess test-retest reliability of measures of sensory (auditory and visual) ERPs and performance, for the two experimental conditions. To assess the degree of reliability of the variability of responses within individuals, this analysis was performed on the variance of the measurements, in addition to their means. This yielded a total of 24 measures for which ICCs were calculated. RESULTS: The data yielded significant good ICC values for 10 of the 24 measurements. These spanned across behavioral and ERPs data, experimental conditions, and mean as well as variance measures. Measures of the visual evoked responses accounted for a disproportionately large number of the significant ICCs; follow-up analyses suggested that the contribution of a greater number of trials to the visual compared to the auditory ERP partially accounted for this. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis reveals that sensory ERPs and related behavior can be highly reliable across multiple measurement time-points in ASD. The data further suggest that the inter-trial and inter-participant variability reported in the ASD literature likely represents replicable individual participant neural processing differences. The stability of these neuronal readouts supports their use as biomarkers in clinical and translational studies on ASD. Given the minimum interval between test/retest sessions across our cohort, we also conclude that for the tested age-range of ~ 6 to 9.4 years, these reliability measures are valid for at least a 3-month interval. Limitations related to EEG task demands and study length in the context of a clinical trial are considered.
BACKGROUND: Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are associated with altered sensory processing and perception. Scalp recordings of electrical brain activity time-locked to sensory events (event-related potentials; ERPs) provide precise information on the time-course of related altered neural activity, and can be used to model the cortical loci of the underlying neural networks. Establishing the test-retest reliability of these sensory brain responses in ASD is critical to their use as biomarkers of neural dysfunction in this population. METHODS: EEG and behavioral data were acquired from 33 children diagnosed with ASD aged 6-9.4 years old, while they performed a child-friendly task at two different time-points, separated by an average of 5.2 months. In two blocked conditions, participants responded to the occurrence of an auditory target that was either preceded or not by repeating visual stimuli. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to assess test-retest reliability of measures of sensory (auditory and visual) ERPs and performance, for the two experimental conditions. To assess the degree of reliability of the variability of responses within individuals, this analysis was performed on the variance of the measurements, in addition to their means. This yielded a total of 24 measures for which ICCs were calculated. RESULTS: The data yielded significant good ICC values for 10 of the 24 measurements. These spanned across behavioral and ERPs data, experimental conditions, and mean as well as variance measures. Measures of the visual evoked responses accounted for a disproportionately large number of the significant ICCs; follow-up analyses suggested that the contribution of a greater number of trials to the visual compared to the auditory ERP partially accounted for this. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis reveals that sensory ERPs and related behavior can be highly reliable across multiple measurement time-points in ASD. The data further suggest that the inter-trial and inter-participant variability reported in the ASD literature likely represents replicable individual participant neural processing differences. The stability of these neuronal readouts supports their use as biomarkers in clinical and translational studies on ASD. Given the minimum interval between test/retest sessions across our cohort, we also conclude that for the tested age-range of ~ 6 to 9.4 years, these reliability measures are valid for at least a 3-month interval. Limitations related to EEG task demands and study length in the context of a clinical trial are considered.
Authors: Mustafa Sahin; Stephanie R Jones; John A Sweeney; Elizabeth Berry-Kravis; Barry W Connors; Joshua B Ewen; Adam L Hartman; April R Levin; William Z Potter; Laura A Mamounas Journal: Nat Rev Drug Discov Date: 2018-12-20 Impact factor: 84.694
Authors: Timothy P L Roberts; Sarah Y Khan; Mike Rey; Justin F Monroe; Katelyn Cannon; Lisa Blaskey; Sarah Woldoff; Saba Qasmieh; Mike Gandal; Gwen L Schmidt; Deborah M Zarnow; Susan E Levy; J Christopher Edgar Journal: Autism Res Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 5.216
Authors: Olga V Sysoeva; Sophie Molholm; Aleksandra Djukic; Hans-Peter Frey; John J Foxe Journal: Transl Psychiatry Date: 2020-06-10 Impact factor: 6.222
Authors: Zachary J Williams; Peter G Abdelmessih; Alexandra P Key; Tiffany G Woynaroski Journal: Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging Date: 2020-09-22
Authors: Emily J Knight; Aaron I Krakowski; Edward G Freedman; John S Butler; Sophie Molholm; John J Foxe Journal: Mol Autism Date: 2022-07-18 Impact factor: 6.476