Literature DB >> 33211205

Standardized fluoroscopy-guided implantation technique enables optimal electrode placement in sacral neuromodulation: a cadaver study.

C Müller1, L F Reissig2, S Argeny1, W J Weninger2, S Riss3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is an established treatment option for patients with faecal incontinence. The location of the stimulating electrode is considered to be essential for treatment success. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the position of SNM electrodes after using a standardized fluoroscopy-guided implantation technique.
METHODS: For this cadaver study, SNM electrodes were implanted bilaterally in 5 lower body specimens. The lower edge of the sacroiliac joint and the medial edge of the sacral foramina were marked using fluoroscopy to draw an 'H' with the crossing points identifying S3. After electrode placement the pelvis was dissected to describe the exact position of the SNM electrodes.
RESULTS: The electrodes were inserted at an angle with a median degree measure of 60° (range 50-65°) to the skin, with a median distance of 9 mm (range 0-13 mm) from the S3 marking. All electrodes entered the third sacral foramen. The median distance of the electrodes to the sacral nerve was 0 mm (range 0-3 mm) for the most proximal, 0.5 mm (range 0-5 mm) for the second, 2.25 mm (range 0-11 mm) for the third and 1.75 mm (range 0-16 mm) for the most distant electrode. There was neither a significant difference in the proximity of the electrodes to the nerve between the right and left side (proximal to distal electrode: p = 0.18, p = 0.16, p = 0.07, p = 0.07) nor between male and female cadavers (p = 0.25, p = 0.21, p = 0.66, p = 0.66).
CONCLUSIONS: A standardized fluoroscopy-guided implantation technique enables a close contact between electrode and nerve. This can potentially result in an improved clinical outcome.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anatomical landmarks; Electrode localization; Faecal incontinence; Lead placement; Sacral neuromodulation; Treatment success

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33211205      PMCID: PMC7884365          DOI: 10.1007/s10151-020-02364-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  13 in total

1.  Modified techniques of S3 foramen localization and lead implantation in S3 neuromodulation.

Authors:  T C Chai; G J Mamo
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Optimizing electrode implantation in sacral nerve stimulation--an anatomical cadaver study controlled by a laparoscopic camera.

Authors:  N C Buchs; J-C Dembe; J Robert-Yap; B Roche; J Fasel
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-08-18       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence and constipation: a European consensus statement.

Authors:  Y Maeda; P R O'Connell; P-A Lehur; K E Matzel; S Laurberg
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.788

4.  Functional evaluation of sacral nerve root integrity. Report of a technique.

Authors:  R A Schmidt; E Senn; E A Tanagho
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Surface and boney landmarks for sacral neuromodulation: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Nicolette E Deveneau; Miriam Greenstein; Abhijit Mahalingashetty; Nicole R Herring; Lioudmila Lipetskaia; Ali Azadi; Donald R Ostergard; Sean L Francis
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Failure of sacral nerve stimulation due to migration of tined lead.

Authors:  Donna Y Deng; Mittul Gulati; Matthew Rutman; Shlomo Raz; Larissa V Rodríguez
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Surface localization of sacral foramina for neuromodulation of bladder function. An anatomical study.

Authors:  S T Hasan; D A Shanahan; A K Pridie; D E Neal
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Is the efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence dependent on the number of active electrode poles achieved during permanent lead insertion?

Authors:  J Duelund-Jakobsen; L Lundby; P-A Lehur; V Wyart; S Laurberg; S Buntzen
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.788

9.  Randomized prospective crossover study of interstim lead wire placement with curved versus straight stylet.

Authors:  Stephanie A Jacobs; Felicia L Lane; Kathryn E Osann; Karen L Noblett
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 2.696

10.  Optimal Lead Positioning in Sacral Neuromodulation: Which Factors Are Related to Treatment Outcome?

Authors:  Ranjana Jairam; Tom Marcelissen; Gommert van Koeveringe; Philip van Kerrebroeck
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2017-09-06
View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of surgical techniques for optimal lead placement in sacral neuromodulation: a cadaver study.

Authors:  C Dawoud; L Reissig; C Müller; M Jahl; F Harpain; B Capek; W J Weninger; S Riss
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2022-05-28       Impact factor: 3.699

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.