Literature DB >> 25257811

Surface and boney landmarks for sacral neuromodulation: a cadaveric study.

Nicolette E Deveneau1, Miriam Greenstein, Abhijit Mahalingashetty, Nicole R Herring, Lioudmila Lipetskaia, Ali Azadi, Donald R Ostergard, Sean L Francis.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Standard external landmarks have been suggested as a guide for in-office percutaneous nerve evaluation (PNE), but validity of these landmarks has not been assessed. Our objective was to determine whether the standard 9 cm from the tip of the coccyx indicates the position of the S3 sacral foramen and whether other boney landmarks and measurements improved positioning.
METHODS: Measurements and distances between external boney landmarks were obtained in 22 embalmed cadavers. Spinal needles were placed 9 cm superior to the coccyx and 2 cm lateral to midline bilaterally. After dissection, internal measurements relating to sacral length, position of S3, and location of the needle in relation to S3 were recorded. Correlations among measured variables were assessed using descriptive statistics.
RESULTS: Mean distance from the tip of coccyx to S3 was 9.26 cm (±0.84), from S3 to midline 2.30 cm (±0.2); from needle to S3 1.25 cm, and needle placement was as likely to be placed above or below S3; and S2-S3 and S3-S4 interforamenal distance 1.48 cm (±0.30) and 1.48 cm (±0.24), respectively. Mean distance from S3 to sacroiliac joint (SIJ) was shorter than S2 to SIJ. All associations between external measurements and length from tip of coccyx to S3 were not significant.
CONCLUSION: A distance 9 cm from the tip of the coccyx is a reasonable starting landmark for in-office blind PNE. However, given the variability in coccyx length, caution should be taken; also, sensory-motor response is necessary to confirm proper placement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25257811     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-014-2504-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  16 in total

1.  Sacral nerve stimulation for treatment of refractory urinary urge incontinence. Sacral Nerve Stimulation Study Group.

Authors:  R A Schmidt; U Jonas; K A Oleson; R A Janknegt; M M Hassouna; S W Siegel; P E van Kerrebroeck
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Inter-examiner and intra-examiner agreement for assessing sacroiliac anatomical landmarks using palpation and observation: pilot study.

Authors:  C O'Haire; P Gibbons
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2000-02

3.  Modified techniques of S3 foramen localization and lead implantation in S3 neuromodulation.

Authors:  T C Chai; G J Mamo
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Procedural techniques in sacral nerve modulation.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Williams; Steven W Siegel
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: long-term outcome.

Authors:  K E Matzel; P Lux; S Heuer; M Besendörfer; W Zhang
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 3.788

6.  Sacral root neuromodulation in idiopathic nonobstructive chronic urinary retention.

Authors:  H S Shaker; M Hassouna
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Third sacral foramina morphometry for sacral neuromodulation.

Authors:  Mona C McCullough; Summer Decker; Jonathan Ford; Katheryne Downes; Don Hilbelink; Raul Ordorica; Lennox Hoyte; Stuart Hart
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.091

8.  Efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation for urinary retention: results 18 months after implantation.

Authors:  U Jonas; C J Fowler; M B Chancellor; M M Elhilali; M Fall; J B Gajewski; V Grünewald; M M Hassouna; U Hombergh; R Janknegt; P E van Kerrebroeck; A A Lylcklama a Nijeholt; S W Siegel; R A Schmidt
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 9.  Latest technologic and surgical developments in using InterStim Therapy for sacral neuromodulation: impact on treatment success and safety.

Authors:  Michele Spinelli; Karl-Dietrich Sievert
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  New sacral neuromodulation lead for percutaneous implantation using local anesthesia: description and first experience.

Authors:  Michele Spinelli; Gianluca Giardiello; Martin Gerber; Andrea Arduini; Ubi van den Hombergh; Silvia Malaguti
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  4 in total

1.  Surface anatomical landmarks for the location of posterior sacral foramina in sacral nerve stimulation.

Authors:  A Povo; M Arantes; K E Matzel; J Barbosa; M A Ferreira; D Pais; A Rodríguez-Baeza
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  The development of neural stimulators: a review of preclinical safety and efficacy studies.

Authors:  Robert K Shepherd; Joel Villalobos; Owen Burns; David A X Nayagam
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Postoperative Pain Relief With Ultrasound-Guided Dorsal Sacral Foramen Block for Foot and Ankle Surgeries.

Authors:  Sandeep Diwan; Madhuri Dadke; Avinash Gaikwad; Himaunshu Dongre; Ganesh P Bhong; Parag K Sancheti; Abhijit Nair
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-02-28

4.  Standardized fluoroscopy-guided implantation technique enables optimal electrode placement in sacral neuromodulation: a cadaver study.

Authors:  C Müller; L F Reissig; S Argeny; W J Weninger; S Riss
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 3.781

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.