Literature DB >> 28877395

Optimal Lead Positioning in Sacral Neuromodulation: Which Factors Are Related to Treatment Outcome?

Ranjana Jairam1,2, Tom Marcelissen1,2, Gommert van Koeveringe1,2,3, Philip van Kerrebroeck1,2,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is a well-established treatment for overactive bladder (OAB) and non-obstructive urinary retention (NOR). During test stimulation, the lead is positioned along the third sacral nerve, which ideally results in a response in all four contact points (active electrodes). However, it is unclear whether the position of the lead (depth, angle, deflection) and the number of active electrodes is related to the outcome of SNM.
METHODS: All patients who underwent test stimulation using the tined lead between January 2011 and September 2016 were included in this retrospective study. Success was defined as >50% improvement in voiding diary parameters compared to baseline. The correlation between lead position and outcome of test stimulation was evaluated. The lead position was determined by evaluating the depth, angle and deflection with respect to the sacral foramen. Binary logistic regression was used in order to determine the predictive value of these factors.
RESULTS: We included 189 patients of whom 105 were diagnosed with OAB and 84 with NOR. After a SNM test period of 4 weeks, 111 patients (59%) were successful and received a permanent implant. The position of the lead and the number of active electrodes did not predict success of test stimulation in neither the OAB group nor the NOR. However, lateral deflection of the lead was associated with finding more active electrodes (p = 0.01).
CONCLUSION: In our study, the position of the lead or the number of active electrodes did not predict the outcome of SNM test stimulation. However, the impact of lead positioning and number of active electrodes on long-term outcome remains to be proven.
© 2017 International Neuromodulation Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lead position; non-obstructive urinary retention; overactive bladder; sacral neuromodulation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28877395     DOI: 10.1111/ner.12649

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuromodulation        ISSN: 1094-7159


  2 in total

1.  Predictive Factors in Sacral Neuromodulation: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ranjana Jairam; Jamie Drossaerts; Tom Marcelissen; Gommert van Koeveringe; Desiree Vrijens; Philip van Kerrebroeck
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 1.934

2.  Standardized fluoroscopy-guided implantation technique enables optimal electrode placement in sacral neuromodulation: a cadaver study.

Authors:  C Müller; L F Reissig; S Argeny; W J Weninger; S Riss
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 3.781

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.