Gina M Piscitello1, Corinna M Fukushima2, Anna K Saulitis3, Katherine T Tian4, Jennifer Hwang2, Shreya Gupta3, Mark Sheldon5. 1. Section of Palliative Medicine, 12245Rush Medical College, Chicago, IL, USA. 2. 12245Rush Medical College, Chicago, IL, USA. 3. Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL USA. 4. Department of Medicine, 12245Rush Medical College, Chicago, IL, USA. 5. Department of Philosophy, 3270Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Visitor restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic limit in-person family meetings for hospitalized patients. We aimed to evaluate the quantity of family meetings by telephone, video and in-person during the COVID-19 pandemic by manual chart review. Secondary outcomes included rate of change in patient goals of care between video and in-person meetings, the timing of family meetings, and variability in meetings by race and ethnicity. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study evaluated patients admitted to the intensive care unit at an urban academic hospital between March and June 2020. Patients lacking decision-making capacity and receiving a referral for a video meeting were included in this study. RESULTS: Most patients meeting inclusion criteria (N = 61/481, 13%) had COVID-19 pneumonia (n = 57/61, 93%). A total of 650 documented family meetings occurred. Few occurred in-person (n = 70/650, 11%) or discussed goals of care (n = 233/650, 36%). For meetings discussing goals of care, changes in patient goals of care occurred more often for in-person meetings rather than by video (36% vs. 11%, p = 0.0006). The average time to the first goals of care family meeting was 11.4 days from admission. More documented telephone meetings per admission were observed for White (10.5, SD 9.5) and Black/African-American (7.1, SD 6.6) patients compared to Hispanic or Latino patients (4.9, SD 4.9) (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: During this period of strict visitor restrictions, few family meetings occurred in-person. Statistically significant fewer changes in patient goals of care occurred following video meetings compared to in-person meetings, providing support limiting in-person meetings may affect patient care.
PURPOSE: Visitor restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic limit in-person family meetings for hospitalized patients. We aimed to evaluate the quantity of family meetings by telephone, video and in-person during the COVID-19 pandemic by manual chart review. Secondary outcomes included rate of change in patient goals of care between video and in-person meetings, the timing of family meetings, and variability in meetings by race and ethnicity. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study evaluated patients admitted to the intensive care unit at an urban academic hospital between March and June 2020. Patients lacking decision-making capacity and receiving a referral for a video meeting were included in this study. RESULTS: Most patients meeting inclusion criteria (N = 61/481, 13%) had COVID-19 pneumonia (n = 57/61, 93%). A total of 650 documented family meetings occurred. Few occurred in-person (n = 70/650, 11%) or discussed goals of care (n = 233/650, 36%). For meetings discussing goals of care, changes in patient goals of care occurred more often for in-person meetings rather than by video (36% vs. 11%, p = 0.0006). The average time to the first goals of care family meeting was 11.4 days from admission. More documented telephone meetings per admission were observed for White (10.5, SD 9.5) and Black/African-American (7.1, SD 6.6) patients compared to Hispanic or Latino patients (4.9, SD 4.9) (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: During this period of strict visitor restrictions, few family meetings occurred in-person. Statistically significant fewer changes in patient goals of care occurred following video meetings compared to in-person meetings, providing support limiting in-person meetings may affect patient care.
Entities:
Keywords:
COVID-19; critical care; family meetings; intensive care unit; patient-physician communication; telehealth
Authors: Douglas B White; Derek C Angus; Anne-Marie Shields; Praewpannarai Buddadhumaruk; Caroline Pidro; Cynthia Paner; Elizabeth Chaitin; Chung-Chou H Chang; Francis Pike; Lisa Weissfeld; Jeremy M Kahn; Joseph M Darby; Amy Kowinsky; Susan Martin; Robert M Arnold Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-05-23 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jessica Ma; Stephen Chi; Benjamin Buettner; Katherine Pollard; Monica Muir; Charu Kolekar; Noor Al-Hammadi; Ling Chen; Marin Kollef; Maria Dans Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Daniel M Weinberger; Jenny Chen; Ted Cohen; Forrest W Crawford; Farzad Mostashari; Don Olson; Virginia E Pitzer; Nicholas G Reich; Marcus Russi; Lone Simonsen; Anne Watkins; Cecile Viboud Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2020-10-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Carlos M Chiesa-Estomba; Jérome R Lechien; Christian Calvo-Henríquez; Nicolas Fakhry; Petros D Karkos; Shazia Peer; Jon A Sistiaga-Suarez; José A Gónzalez-García; Giovanni Cammaroto; Miguel Mayo-Yánez; Pablo Parente-Arias; Sven Saussez; Tareck Ayad Journal: Oral Oncol Date: 2020-06-05 Impact factor: 5.337
Authors: Audra N Iness; Jefferson O Abaricia; Wendemi Sawadogo; Caleb M Iness; Max Duesberg; John Cyrus; Vinay Prasad Journal: Am J Med Date: 2022-04-25 Impact factor: 5.928
Authors: Keren Ladin; Thalia Porteny; Julia M Perugini; Kristina M Gonzales; Kate E Aufort; Sarah K Levine; John B Wong; Tamara Isakova; Dena Rifkin; Elisa J Gordon; Ana Rossi; Susan Koch-Weser; Daniel E Weiner Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2021-12-01