Colleen Peyton1, Michael E Msall2,3, Kristen Wroblewski4, Elizabeth E Rogers5, Michael Kohn6, Hannah C Glass5,6,7,8. 1. Department of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Science and Department of Pediatrics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA. 2. Kennedy Research Center on Intellectual and Neurodevelopmental Disabilities, Chicago, IL, USA. 3. Section of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, University of Chicago Comer Children's Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA. 4. Department of Public Health Services, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. 5. Department of Pediatrics, Benioff Children's Hospital, San Francisco, CA, USA. 6. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. 7. Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. 8. Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Abstract
AIM: To determine the concurrent validity of the Warner Initial Developmental Evaluation of Adaptive and Functional Skills (WIDEA-FS), a criterion-specified questionnaire that assesses a child's adaptive skills in everyday contexts, and the Bayley Infant and Toddler Scales of Development, Third Edition (Bayley-III). METHOD: In a prospective cohort study, 431 WIDEA-FS and Bayley-III assessments were completed among 341 children, aged 10 to 36 months corrected age (158 females, 183 males; median [interquartile range] gestational age at birth 32wks [29-38]), monitored in a high-risk neonatal intensive care unit follow-up clinic. RESULTS: WIDEA-FS scores were significantly associated with Bayley-III scores in all domains. Lower scores on the WIDEA-FS were significantly associated with an increased risk of adverse developmental performance on all Bayley-III scales. The association was strongest for motor and language Bayley-III scores when tested at <30 months of age, and for cognitive Bayley-III scores when tested at ≥30 months of age. INTERPRETATION: The WIDEA-FS has concurrent validity with the Bayley-III and may be a useful tool in high-risk follow-up settings. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: WIDEA-FS mobility, communication, and social cognition domains are concurrently valid in infants at high-risk for neurodevelopmental disability. Bayley-III motor, language, and cognitive composite scores are concurrently valid in the same group. The WIDEA-FS mobility and communication domains may be most clinically useful in children <30 months.
AIM: To determine the concurrent validity of the Warner Initial Developmental Evaluation of Adaptive and Functional Skills (WIDEA-FS), a criterion-specified questionnaire that assesses a child's adaptive skills in everyday contexts, and the Bayley Infant and Toddler Scales of Development, Third Edition (Bayley-III). METHOD: In a prospective cohort study, 431 WIDEA-FS and Bayley-III assessments were completed among 341 children, aged 10 to 36 months corrected age (158 females, 183 males; median [interquartile range] gestational age at birth 32wks [29-38]), monitored in a high-risk neonatal intensive care unit follow-up clinic. RESULTS: WIDEA-FS scores were significantly associated with Bayley-III scores in all domains. Lower scores on the WIDEA-FS were significantly associated with an increased risk of adverse developmental performance on all Bayley-III scales. The association was strongest for motor and language Bayley-III scores when tested at <30 months of age, and for cognitive Bayley-III scores when tested at ≥30 months of age. INTERPRETATION: The WIDEA-FS has concurrent validity with the Bayley-III and may be a useful tool in high-risk follow-up settings. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: WIDEA-FS mobility, communication, and social cognition domains are concurrently valid in infants at high-risk for neurodevelopmental disability. Bayley-III motor, language, and cognitive composite scores are concurrently valid in the same group. The WIDEA-FS mobility and communication domains may be most clinically useful in children <30 months.
Authors: Patricia K Duffner; Carl Granger; Nancy Lyon; Paulette Niewczyk; Amy Barczykowski; Sarah Bauer; Michael E Msall Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2012-02-28 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Sarah B Mulkey; Raghu H Ramakrishnaiah; Robert C McKinstry; Taeun Chang; Amit M Mathur; Dennis E Mayock; Krisa P Van Meurs; G Bradley Schaefer; Chunqiao Luo; Shasha Bai; Sandra E Juul; Yvonne W Wu Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2017-04-26 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Marie C McCormick; Jeanne Brooks-Gunn; Stephen L Buka; Julie Goldman; Jennifer Yu; Mikhail Salganik; David T Scott; Forrest C Bennett; Libby L Kay; Judy C Bernbaum; Charles R Bauer; Camilia Martin; Elizabeth R Woods; Anne Martin; Patrick H Casey Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Elena Marbán-Castro; Laia J Vazquez Guillamet; Percy Efrain Pantoja; Aina Casellas; Lauren Maxwell; Sarah B Mulkey; Clara Menéndez; Azucena Bardají Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-06-14 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Linda S Franck; Renée A Shellhaas; Monica E Lemmon; Julie Sturza; Marty Barnes; Trisha Brogi; Elizabeth Hill; Katrina Moline; Janet S Soul; Taeun Chang; Courtney J Wusthoff; Catherine J Chu; Shavonne L Massey; Nicholas S Abend; Cameron Thomas; Elizabeth E Rogers; Charles E McCulloch; Hannah C Glass Journal: Children (Basel) Date: 2021-12-22