Literature DB >> 17671065

Impact of implementing developmental screening at 12 and 24 months in a pediatric practice.

Hollie Hix-Small1, Kevin Marks, Jane Squires, Robert Nickel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness and costs of incorporating a parent-completed developmental screening tool, the Ages and Stages Questionnaire, into the 12- and 24-month well-child visits under "real-world" conditions, using a combined in-office and mail-back data collection protocol.
METHODS: A convenience sample of 1428 caregivers and children presenting for their 12- or 24-month well-child visit between April 2005 and March 2006 participated. Children with identified delays or disorders were excluded. Board-certified pediatricians (n = 18) and nurse practitioners (n = 2) acted as secondary participants. Pediatricians were blinded to Ages and Stages Questionnaire results when completing the Pediatric Developmental Impression. Patients with delayed Ages and Stages Questionnaire or Pediatric Developmental Impression results were referred for additional evaluation.
RESULTS: Referral rates increased by 224%. Pediatrician referral on the basis of the Pediatric Developmental Impression was predicted significantly by suspected communication delay and gross motor delay. The Ages and Stages Questionnaire and Pediatric Developmental Impression results differed significantly, with overall agreement of 81.8%. Of Ages and Stages Questionnaire-delayed cases, 67.5% were not detected by pediatricians. Of the 78 patients referred on the basis of combined Ages and Stages Questionnaire and Pediatric Developmental Impression results, 53 would not have been referred on the basis of Pediatric Developmental Impression results alone; 37 patients qualified for special services, and 44 were scheduled for additional developmental monitoring. The rate of Ages and Stages Questionnaire return by caregivers/parents was 54%.
CONCLUSIONS: Referral rates increased dramatically, with the greatest increase at 12 months. Although patients with pediatrician referrals were likely to qualify for services (96%), physician referrals accounted for only 42% of total referrals, which highlights the need for pediatric developmental screening. The 54% Ages and Stages Questionnaire return rate, although acceptable under study conditions, calls for alternative implementation strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17671065     DOI: 10.1542/peds.2006-3583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  42 in total

Review 1.  Screening in child health: studies of the efficacy and relevance of preventive care practices.

Authors:  Peter Weber; Oskar Jenni
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Caretaker Awareness of Health Care Provided Developmental Screening: Increases from 2007 to 2012.

Authors:  Brian Barger; Andrew Roach; Gabriel Moreno
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2017-12

3.  The Preschool Pediatric Symptom Checklist (PPSC): development and initial validation of a new social/emotional screening instrument.

Authors:  R Christopher Sheldrick; Brandi S Henson; Shela Merchant; Emily N Neger; J Michael Murphy; Ellen C Perrin
Journal:  Acad Pediatr       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 3.107

4.  Telephone-Based Developmental Screening and Care Coordination Through 2-1-1: A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Bergen B Nelson; Lindsey R Thompson; Patricia Herrera; Christopher Biely; Damaris Arriola Zarate; Irene Aceves; Ingrid Estrada; Vincent Chan; Cynthia Orantes; Paul J Chung
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 5.  Universal newborn screening for congenital CMV infection: what is the evidence of potential benefit?

Authors:  Michael J Cannon; Paul D Griffiths; Van Aston; William D Rawlinson
Journal:  Rev Med Virol       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 6.989

6.  Concerns about development, behavior, and learning among parents seeking pediatric care.

Authors:  R Christopher Sheldrick; Emily N Neger; Ellen C Perrin
Journal:  J Dev Behav Pediatr       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.225

7.  Autism Spectrum Disorder Alertness in Dutch Youth and Family Center Physicians: Effects of a Live Online Educational Program.

Authors:  Maarten van 't Hof; Annemyn D Y van Nieuwenhuyzen; Ina van Berckelaer-Onnes; Mathijs Deen; Hans W Hoek; Wietske A Ester
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2021-01-09

8.  A Systematic Review of Part C Early Identification Studies.

Authors:  Brian Barger; Catherine Rice; Christina Anne Simmons; Rebecca Wolf
Journal:  Topics Early Child Spec Educ       Date:  2016-12-20

9.  Sociodemographic Barriers to Early Detection of Autism: Screening and Evaluation Using the M-CHAT, M-CHAT-R, and Follow-Up.

Authors:  Meena K Khowaja; Ann P Hazzard; Diana L Robins
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2015-06

10.  Evidence-based milestones for surveillance of cognitive, language, and motor development.

Authors:  R Christopher Sheldrick; Ellen C Perrin
Journal:  Acad Pediatr       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.107

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.