Kerrie Davies1, Damian Mawer2, A Sarah Walker3,4, Claire Berry1, Timothy Planche5, Phil Stanley6, Simon Goldenberg7,8, Jonathan Sandoe1, Mark H Wilcox1. 1. Healthcare Associated Infection Research Group, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom. 2. Department of Microbiology, York Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, York, United Kingdom. 3. National Institutes of Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom. 4. Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. 5. Institute of Infection and Immunity, St George's University of London, London, United Kingdom. 6. Department of Microbiology, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, United Kingdom. 7. Centre for Clinical Infection and Diagnostics Research, King's College, London, United Kingdom. 8. Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lower Clostridium difficile spore counts in feces from C difficile infection (CDI) patients treated with fidaxomicin versus vancomycin have been observed. We aimed to determine whether environmental contamination is lower in patients treated with fidaxomicin compared with those treated with vancomycin/metronidazole. METHODS: The CDI cases were recruited at 4 UK hospitals (Leeds, Bradford, and London [2 centers]). Environmental samples (5 room sites) were taken pretreatment and at 2-3, 4-5, 6-8, and 9-12 days of treatment, end of treatment (EOT), and post-EOT. Fecal samples were collected at diagnosis and as often as produced thereafter. Swabs/feces were cultured for C difficile; percentage of C difficile-positive samples and C difficile bioburden were compared between different treatment arms at each time point. RESULTS: Pre-EOT (n = 244), there was a significant reduction in environmental contamination (≥1 site positive) around fidaxomicin versus vancomycin/metronidazole recipients at days 4-5 (30% vs 50% recipients, P = .04) and at days 9-12 (22% vs 49%, P = .005). This trend was consistently seen at all other timepoints, but it was not statistically significant. No differences were seen between treatment groups post-EOT (n = 76). Fidaxomicin-associated fecal positivity rates and colony counts were consistently lower than those for vancomycin/metronidazole from days 4 to 5 of treatment (including post-EOT); however, the only significant difference was in positivity rate at days 9-12 (15% vs 55%, P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: There were significant reductions in C difficile recovery from both feces and the environment around fidaxomicin versus vancomycin/metronidazole recipients. Therefore, fidaxomicin treatment may lower the C difficile transmission risk by reducing excretion and environmental contamination.
BACKGROUND: Lower Clostridium difficile spore counts in feces from C difficile infection (CDI) patients treated with fidaxomicin versus vancomycin have been observed. We aimed to determine whether environmental contamination is lower in patients treated with fidaxomicin compared with those treated with vancomycin/metronidazole. METHODS: The CDI cases were recruited at 4 UK hospitals (Leeds, Bradford, and London [2 centers]). Environmental samples (5 room sites) were taken pretreatment and at 2-3, 4-5, 6-8, and 9-12 days of treatment, end of treatment (EOT), and post-EOT. Fecal samples were collected at diagnosis and as often as produced thereafter. Swabs/feces were cultured for C difficile; percentage of C difficile-positive samples and C difficile bioburden were compared between different treatment arms at each time point. RESULTS: Pre-EOT (n = 244), there was a significant reduction in environmental contamination (≥1 site positive) around fidaxomicin versus vancomycin/metronidazole recipients at days 4-5 (30% vs 50% recipients, P = .04) and at days 9-12 (22% vs 49%, P = .005). This trend was consistently seen at all other timepoints, but it was not statistically significant. No differences were seen between treatment groups post-EOT (n = 76). Fidaxomicin-associated fecal positivity rates and colony counts were consistently lower than those for vancomycin/metronidazole from days 4 to 5 of treatment (including post-EOT); however, the only significant difference was in positivity rate at days 9-12 (15% vs 55%, P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: There were significant reductions in C difficile recovery from both feces and the environment around fidaxomicin versus vancomycin/metronidazole recipients. Therefore, fidaxomicin treatment may lower the C difficile transmission risk by reducing excretion and environmental contamination.
Authors: Thomas J Louie; Mark A Miller; Kathleen M Mullane; Karl Weiss; Arnold Lentnek; Yoav Golan; Sherwood Gorbach; Pamela Sears; Youe-Kong Shue Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-02-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Titus Wong; Tracey Woznow; Mike Petrie; Elena Murzello; Allison Muniak; Amin Kadora; Elizabeth Bryce Journal: Am J Infect Control Date: 2015-12-09 Impact factor: 2.918
Authors: Oliver A Cornely; Derrick W Crook; Roberto Esposito; André Poirier; Michael S Somero; Karl Weiss; Pamela Sears; Sherwood Gorbach Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2012-02-08 Impact factor: 25.071
Authors: Michelle M Riggs; Ajay K Sethi; Trina F Zabarsky; Elizabeth C Eckstein; Robin L P Jump; Curtis J Donskey Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2007-09-04 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Wafa N Al-Nassir; Ajay K Sethi; Michelle M Nerandzic; Greg S Bobulsky; Robin L P Jump; Curtis J Donskey Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2008-07-01 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Bobby G Warren; Nicholas A Turner; Rachel Addison; Alicia Nelson; Aaron Barrett; Bechtler Addison; Amanda Graves; Becky Smith; Sarah S Lewis; David J Weber; Emily E Sickbert-Bennett; Deverick J Anderson Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2022-02-09 Impact factor: 3.835