Literature DB >> 21288078

Fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for Clostridium difficile infection.

Thomas J Louie1, Mark A Miller, Kathleen M Mullane, Karl Weiss, Arnold Lentnek, Yoav Golan, Sherwood Gorbach, Pamela Sears, Youe-Kong Shue.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clostridium difficile infection is a serious diarrheal illness associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Patients generally have a response to oral vancomycin or metronidazole; however, the rate of recurrence is high. This phase 3 clinical trial compared the efficacy and safety of fidaxomicin with those of vancomycin in treating C. difficile infection.
METHODS: Adults with acute symptoms of C. difficile infection and a positive result on a stool toxin test were eligible for study entry. We randomly assigned patients to receive fidaxomicin (200 mg twice daily) or vancomycin (125 mg four times daily) orally for 10 days. The primary end point was clinical cure (resolution of symptoms and no need for further therapy for C. difficile infection as of the second day after the end of the course of therapy). The secondary end points were recurrence of C. difficile infection (diarrhea and a positive result on a stool toxin test within 4 weeks after treatment) and global cure (i.e., cure with no recurrence).
RESULTS: A total of 629 patients were enrolled, of whom 548 (87.1%) could be evaluated for the per-protocol analysis. The rates of clinical cure with fidaxomicin were noninferior to those with vancomycin in both the modified intention-to-treat analysis (88.2% with fidaxomicin and 85.8% with vancomycin) and the per-protocol analysis (92.1% and 89.8%, respectively). Significantly fewer patients in the fidaxomicin group than in the vancomycin group had a recurrence of the infection, in both the modified intention-to-treat analysis (15.4% vs. 25.3%, P=0.005) and the per-protocol analysis (13.3% vs. 24.0%, P=0.004). The lower rate of recurrence was seen in patients with non–North American Pulsed Field type 1 strains. The adverse-event profile was similar for the two therapies.
CONCLUSIONS: The rates of clinical cure after treatment with fidaxomicin were noninferior to those after treatment with vancomycin. Fidaxomicin was associated with a significantly lower rate of recurrence of C. difficile infection associated with non–North American Pulsed Field type 1 strains. (Funded by Optimer Pharmaceuticals; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00314951.)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21288078     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0910812

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  460 in total

Review 1.  [Coronary heart disease and its differential treatment].

Authors:  M Diewitz
Journal:  Med Welt       Date:  1975-10-24

Review 2.  Clostridium difficile in the ICU: the struggle continues.

Authors:  Linda D Bobo; Erik R Dubberke; Marin Kollef
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  Fidaxomicin: in Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Sean T Duggan
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Is Clostridium difficile infection still a problem for hospitals?

Authors:  David A Enoch; Sani H Aliyu
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  A new paradigm for clinical trials in antibiotherapy?

Authors:  Kevin B Laupland; David N Fisman
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.471

Review 6.  Clostridium difficile infection: management strategies for a difficult disease.

Authors:  Sahil Khanna; Darrell S Pardi
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.409

Review 7.  Fidaxomicin in Clostridium difficile infection: latest evidence and clinical guidance.

Authors:  Kathleen Mullane
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.091

8.  Microbiota transplantation restores normal fecal bile acid composition in recurrent Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Alexa R Weingarden; Chi Chen; Aleh Bobr; Dan Yao; Yuwei Lu; Valerie M Nelson; Michael J Sadowsky; Alexander Khoruts
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 4.052

Review 9.  Pseudomembranous colitis.

Authors:  Priya D Farooq; Nathalie H Urrunaga; Derek M Tang; Erik C von Rosenvinge
Journal:  Dis Mon       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 3.800

10.  Comparative microbiological studies of transcription inhibitors fidaxomicin and the rifamycins in Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Farah Babakhani; Jaime Seddon; Pamela Sears
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.