Literature DB >> 18491964

Comparison of clinical and microbiological response to treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated disease with metronidazole and vancomycin.

Wafa N Al-Nassir1, Ajay K Sethi, Michelle M Nerandzic, Greg S Bobulsky, Robin L P Jump, Curtis J Donskey.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There have been recent reports of frequent treatment failure associated with the use of metronidazole for treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated disease. We tested the hypothesis that treatment failure with metronidazole is associated with a suboptimal microbiological response in comparison with that of vancomycin.
METHODS: We conducted a 9-month prospective observational study of patients with C. difficile-associated disease. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare metronidazole-treated and vancomycin-treated patients in terms of time to resolution of diarrhea and time to reduction of C. difficile in stool to an undetectable level.
RESULTS: Of 52 study patients with C. difficile-associated disease, 34 (65%) received initial therapy with oral metronidazole, and 18 (35%) received initial therapy with oral vancomycin. Diarrhea resolved in >90% of patients who completed 10 days of treatment with either agent. However, vancomycin-treated patients were more likely to develop undetectable levels of C. difficile (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.99; 95% confidence interval, 1.41-11.3;P = .009) and to have resolution of diarrhea (adjusted hazard ratio, 4.17; 95% confidence interval, 1.53-11.40;P = .005) during the first 5 days of therapy. Ten metronidazole-treated patients (29%) had their treatment changed to oral vancomycin because of persistent symptoms. Seven (70%) of these 10 patients had <1 log reduction in C.difficile concentration; however, only 4 had completed > or = 6 days of metronidazole treatment at the time of the treatment change.
CONCLUSION: In an observational study with a limited number of subjects, a majority of patients with C. difficile-associated disease responded to therapy with metronidazole or vancomycin. Failure with metronidazole treatment may be attributable to a slower and less consistent microbiological response than that with oral vancomycin treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18491964     DOI: 10.1086/588293

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Infect Dis        ISSN: 1058-4838            Impact factor:   9.079


  41 in total

1.  Can metronidazole still be used for treatment of Clostridium difficile infections?

Authors:  Haihui Huang; Carl Erik Nord
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.725

2.  Is fidaxomicin worth the cost? An economic analysis.

Authors:  Sarah M Bartsch; Craig A Umscheid; Neil Fishman; Bruce Y Lee
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 3.  Comparison of three current Clostridioides difficile infection guidelines: IDSA/SHEA, ESCMID, and ACG guidelines.

Authors:  Abrar K Thabit; Mawadah H Alsolami; Nojoud A Baghlaf; Raghad M Alsharekh; Hadeel A Almazmumi; Afrah S Alselami; Fatmah A Alsubhi
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 4.  Treatment of refractory and recurrent Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Christina M Surawicz; Jacob Alexander
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 5.  Recurrent Clostridium difficile infection: what are the treatment options?

Authors:  Claire M F van Nispen tot Pannerden; Annelies Verbon; Ernst J Kuipers
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-05-07       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  In vitro and in vivo characterization of CB-183,315, a novel lipopeptide antibiotic for treatment of Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Carmela T M Mascio; Lawrence I Mortin; Karen T Howland; Andrew D G Van Praagh; Shuxin Zhang; Anu Arya; Cun Lan Chuong; Chunfeng Kang; Tongchuan Li; Jared A Silverman
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 7.  Treatment Strategies for Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection.

Authors:  Christine Leong; Sheryl Zelenitsky
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2013-11

8.  Clinical outcomes, safety, and pharmacokinetics of OPT-80 in a phase 2 trial with patients with Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  T Louie; M Miller; C Donskey; K Mullane; E J C Goldstein
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 9.  A review of the economics of treating Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Kari A Mergenhagen; Amy L Wojciechowski; Joseph A Paladino
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  Markers of intestinal inflammation, not bacterial burden, correlate with clinical outcomes in Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Rana E El Feghaly; Jennifer L Stauber; Elena Deych; Carlos Gonzalez; Phillip I Tarr; David B Haslam
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 9.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.