Literature DB >> 33202074

Optimal parameters in variable-velocity scanning luminescence lifetime microscopy.

Zdeněk Petrášek1, Juan M Bolivar1, Bernd Nidetzky1,2.   

Abstract

We determine the optimal parameters (scan velocities) for measuring the luminescence lifetime on the microsecond scale using the recently introduced method based on scanning the excitation beam across the sample. Using simulations, we evaluate the standard deviation and bias of the luminescence decay rate determined by scanning with two different velocities. The analysis is performed for Poisson- and normal-distributed signals, representing different types of detection techniques. We also show that a weak uncorrected background induces a bias in the obtained decay rate, and take this effect into account when choosing optimal measurement parameters. For comparison, the analysis is additionally performed for two conventional gating schemes for lifetime measurement. The variable-velocity scanning method is found to be more robust to the effect of the background signal than the gating schemes.
© 2020 The Authors. Microscopy Research and Technique published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  confocal laser scanning microscopy; error analysis; lifetime imaging; luminescence; phosphorescence

Year:  2020        PMID: 33202074      PMCID: PMC7818266          DOI: 10.1002/jemt.23566

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microsc Res Tech        ISSN: 1059-910X            Impact factor:   2.769


  11 in total

1.  Optimized gating scheme for rapid lifetime determinations of single-exponential luminescence lifetimes.

Authors:  S P Chan; Z J Fuller; J N Demas; B A DeGraff
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Comparison of methods for rapid evaluation of lifetimes of exponential decays.

Authors:  Christopher Moore; Sing Po Chan; J N Demas; B A DeGraff
Journal:  Appl Spectrosc       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.388

Review 3.  Time-resolved fluorescence microscopy.

Authors:  Klaus Suhling; Paul M W French; David Phillips
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol Sci       Date:  2004-11-11       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Calibration method for the center of mass method to enlarge the solvable range of fluorescence lifetime.

Authors:  Jiangtao Xu; Jun Qiao; Kaiming Nie; An Zhang
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 2.129

Review 5.  Fluorescence lifetime based bioassays.

Authors:  Franz-Josef Meyer-Almes
Journal:  Methods Appl Fluoresc       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 3.009

Review 6.  Shine a light on immobilized enzymes: real-time sensing in solid supported biocatalysts.

Authors:  Juan M Bolivar; Tanja Consolati; Torsten Mayr; Bernd Nidetzky
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 19.536

Review 7.  Optical methods for sensing and imaging oxygen: materials, spectroscopies and applications.

Authors:  Xu-dong Wang; Otto S Wolfbeis
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 54.564

Review 8.  Integration and application of optical chemical sensors in microbioreactors.

Authors:  Pia Gruber; Marco P C Marques; Nicolas Szita; Torsten Mayr
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 6.799

9.  Confocal Luminescence Lifetime Imaging with Variable Scan Velocity and Its Application to Oxygen Sensing.

Authors:  Zdeněk Petrášek; Juan M Bolivar; Bernd Nidetzky
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 6.986

10.  Optimal parameters in variable-velocity scanning luminescence lifetime microscopy.

Authors:  Zdeněk Petrášek; Juan M Bolivar; Bernd Nidetzky
Journal:  Microsc Res Tech       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 2.769

View more
  1 in total

1.  Optimal parameters in variable-velocity scanning luminescence lifetime microscopy.

Authors:  Zdeněk Petrášek; Juan M Bolivar; Bernd Nidetzky
Journal:  Microsc Res Tech       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 2.769

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.