Demetris Yannopoulos1, Jason Bartos2, Ganesh Raveendran2, Emily Walser2, John Connett3, Thomas A Murray3, Gary Collins3, Lin Zhang3, Rajat Kalra2, Marinos Kosmopoulos2, Ranjit John4, Andrew Shaffer4, R J Frascone5, Keith Wesley6, Marc Conterato7, Michelle Biros8, Jakub Tolar9, Tom P Aufderheide10. 1. Center for Resuscitation Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA. Electronic address: yanno001@umn.edu. 2. Center for Resuscitation Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA. 3. Division of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, MN, USA. 4. Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA. 5. St Paul Fire and Emergency Medical Services, St Paul, MN, USA. 6. M Health Fairview Emergency Medical Services, Minneapolis, MN, USA. 7. North Memorial Emergency Medical Services, Robbinsdale, MN, USA. 8. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA. 9. Center for Resuscitation Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA. 10. Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Among patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and ventricular fibrillation, more than half present with refractory ventricular fibrillation unresponsive to initial standard advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) treatment. We did the first randomised clinical trial in the USA of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)-facilitated resuscitation versus standard ACLS treatment in patients with OHCA and refractory ventricular fibrillation. METHODS: For this phase 2, single centre, open-label, adaptive, safety and efficacy randomised clinical trial, we included adults aged 18-75 years presenting to the University of Minnesota Medical Center (MN, USA) with OHCA and refractory ventricular fibrillation, no return of spontaneous circulation after three shocks, automated cardiopulmonary resuscitation with a Lund University Cardiac Arrest System, and estimated transfer time shorter than 30 min. Patients were randomly assigned to early ECMO-facilitated resuscitation or standard ACLS treatment on hospital arrival by use of a secure schedule generated with permuted blocks of randomly varying block sizes. Allocation concealment was achieved by use of a randomisation schedule that required scratching off an opaque layer to reveal assignment. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes were safety, survival, and functional assessment at hospital discharge and at 3 months and 6 months after discharge. All analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis. The study qualified for exception from informed consent (21 Code of Federal Regulations 50.24). The ARREST trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03880565. FINDINGS:Between Aug 8, 2019, and June 14, 2020, 36 patients were assessed for inclusion. After exclusion of six patients, 30 were randomly assigned to standard ACLS treatment (n=15) or to early ECMO-facilitated resuscitation (n=15). One patient in the ECMO-facilitated resuscitation group withdrew from the study before discharge. The mean age was 59 years (range 36-73), and 25 (83%) of 30 patients were men. Survival to hospital discharge was observed in one (7%) of 15 patients (95% credible interval 1·6-30·2) in the standard ACLS treatment group versus six (43%) of 14 patients (21·3-67·7) in the early ECMO-facilitated resuscitation group (risk difference 36·2%, 3·7-59·2; posterior probability of ECMO superiority 0·9861). The study was terminated at the first preplanned interim analysis by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute after unanimous recommendation from the Data Safety Monitoring Board after enrolling 30 patients because the posterior probability of ECMO superiority exceeded the prespecified monitoring boundary. Cumulative 6-month survival was significantly better in the early ECMO group than in the standard ACLS group. No unanticipated serious adverse events were observed. INTERPRETATION: Early ECMO-facilitated resuscitation for patients with OHCA and refractory ventricular fibrillation significantly improved survival to hospital discharge compared with standard ACLS treatment. FUNDING: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Among patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and ventricular fibrillation, more than half present with refractory ventricular fibrillation unresponsive to initial standard advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) treatment. We did the first randomised clinical trial in the USA of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)-facilitated resuscitation versus standard ACLS treatment in patients with OHCA and refractory ventricular fibrillation. METHODS: For this phase 2, single centre, open-label, adaptive, safety and efficacy randomised clinical trial, we included adults aged 18-75 years presenting to the University of Minnesota Medical Center (MN, USA) with OHCA and refractory ventricular fibrillation, no return of spontaneous circulation after three shocks, automated cardiopulmonary resuscitation with a Lund University Cardiac Arrest System, and estimated transfer time shorter than 30 min. Patients were randomly assigned to early ECMO-facilitated resuscitation or standard ACLS treatment on hospital arrival by use of a secure schedule generated with permuted blocks of randomly varying block sizes. Allocation concealment was achieved by use of a randomisation schedule that required scratching off an opaque layer to reveal assignment. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes were safety, survival, and functional assessment at hospital discharge and at 3 months and 6 months after discharge. All analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis. The study qualified for exception from informed consent (21 Code of Federal Regulations 50.24). The ARREST trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03880565. FINDINGS: Between Aug 8, 2019, and June 14, 2020, 36 patients were assessed for inclusion. After exclusion of six patients, 30 were randomly assigned to standard ACLS treatment (n=15) or to early ECMO-facilitated resuscitation (n=15). One patient in the ECMO-facilitated resuscitation group withdrew from the study before discharge. The mean age was 59 years (range 36-73), and 25 (83%) of 30 patients were men. Survival to hospital discharge was observed in one (7%) of 15 patients (95% credible interval 1·6-30·2) in the standard ACLS treatment group versus six (43%) of 14 patients (21·3-67·7) in the early ECMO-facilitated resuscitation group (risk difference 36·2%, 3·7-59·2; posterior probability of ECMO superiority 0·9861). The study was terminated at the first preplanned interim analysis by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute after unanimous recommendation from the Data Safety Monitoring Board after enrolling 30 patients because the posterior probability of ECMO superiority exceeded the prespecified monitoring boundary. Cumulative 6-month survival was significantly better in the early ECMO group than in the standard ACLS group. No unanticipated serious adverse events were observed. INTERPRETATION: Early ECMO-facilitated resuscitation for patients with OHCA and refractory ventricular fibrillation significantly improved survival to hospital discharge compared with standard ACLS treatment. FUNDING: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
Authors: Demetris Yannopoulos; Jason A Bartos; Tom P Aufderheide; Clifton W Callaway; Rajat Deo; Santiago Garcia; Henry R Halperin; Karl B Kern; Peter J Kudenchuk; Robert W Neumar; Ganesh Raveendran Journal: Circulation Date: 2019-03-19 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Demetris Yannopoulos; Jason A Bartos; Ganesh Raveendran; Marc Conterato; Ralph J Frascone; Alexander Trembley; Ranjit John; John Connett; David G Benditt; Keith G Lurie; Robert F Wilson; Tom P Aufderheide Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2017-08-29 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Demetris Yannopoulos; Rajat Kalra; Marinos Kosmopoulos; Emily Walser; Jason A Bartos; Thomas A Murray; John E Connett; Tom P Aufderheide Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2020-07-15 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Demetris Yannopoulos; Jason A Bartos; Cindy Martin; Ganesh Raveendran; Emil Missov; Marc Conterato; R J Frascone; Alexander Trembley; Kevin Sipprell; Ranjit John; Stephen George; Kathleen Carlson; Melissa E Brunsvold; Santiago Garcia; Tom P Aufderheide Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2016-06-13 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Jason A Bartos; R J Frascone; Marc Conterato; Keith Wesley; Charles Lick; Kevin Sipprell; Nik Vuljaj; Aaron Burnett; Bjorn K Peterson; Nicholas Simpson; Kealy Ham; Charles Bruen; Casey Woster; Kari B Haley; Joanna Moore; Brandon Trigger; Lucinda Hodgson; Kim Harkins; Marinos Kosmopoulos; Tom P Aufderheide; Jakub Tolar; Demetris Yannopoulos Journal: EClinicalMedicine Date: 2020-11-13
Authors: Joseph E Tonna; Craig H Selzman; Saket Girotra; Angela P Presson; Ravi R Thiagarajan; Lance B Becker; Chong Zhang; Peter Rycus; Heather T Keenan Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2022-01-12 Impact factor: 11.195
Authors: Tom P Aufderheide; Rajat Kalra; Marinos Kosmopoulos; Jason A Bartos; Demetris Yannopoulos Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 2021-02-20 Impact factor: 5.691
Authors: Timothy N Jones; Matthew Kelham; Krishnaraj S Rathod; Charles J Knight; Alastair Proudfoot; Ajay K Jain; Andrew Wragg; Muhiddin Ozkor; Paul Rees; Oliver Guttmann; Andreas Baumbach; Anthony Mathur; Daniel A Jones Journal: Am J Cardiovasc Dis Date: 2021-12-15
Authors: Jasmeet Soar; Bernd W Böttiger; Pierre Carli; Keith Couper; Charles D Deakin; Therese Djärv; Carsten Lott; Theresa Olasveengen; Peter Paal; Tommaso Pellis; Gavin D Perkins; Claudio Sandroni; Jerry P Nolan Journal: Notf Rett Med Date: 2021-06-08 Impact factor: 0.826