| Literature DB >> 33195385 |
Mohammed A Aldriweesh1, Ghadeer L Aljahdali1, Edi A Shafaay1, Dalal Z Alangari2, Nawaf A Alhamied1, Hadeel A Alradhi2, Amirah S Yaqoub1, Sami El-Boghdadly3, Omar S Aldibasi4,5, Abdallah A Adlan6.
Abstract
Background: Rapid weight loss after bariatric surgery is a known risk factor for cholelithiasis development. This study aimed to estimate the incidence of cholelithiasis following bariatric surgery among morbidly obese patients who underwent bariatric surgery.Entities:
Keywords: BMI—body mass index; LSG; cholecystecomy; gallstones; laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy; weight loss
Year: 2020 PMID: 33195385 PMCID: PMC7641899 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.559064
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Surg ISSN: 2296-875X
Baseline characteristics of bariatric surgery patients.
| 36.87 ± 11.44 | |
| 189 (38.7%) | |
| 408 (87.74%) | |
| 145 (29.59%) | |
| 434 (88.57%) | |
| 233 (58.54%) | |
| 123.31 ± 21.89 | |
| 88.62 ± 21.75 | |
| 32 (6.53%) | |
| 23 (89.82%) |
RYGB and Others, Roux-en-Y gastric band, gastric bypass, adjustable gastric band.
HDL, high-density lipoprotein (N > 1.5 mmol/L); LDL, low-density lipoprotein (N < 1.8 mmol/L); Trig, triglycerides (N < 1.7 mmol/L); TBili, total bilirubin serum (N < 20.1 μmol/L).
TWL%, total weight loss percentage.
EBMIL%, excess body mass index loss percentage.
Association between cholelithiasis and possible risk factors.
| 34.67 ± 9.84 | 37.03 ± 11.53 | 0.26 | |
| Male | 11 (5.82%) | 178 (94.18%) | 0.614 |
| Female | 21 (6.98%) | 280 (93.02%) | |
| Non-smoker | 26 (6.37%) | 382 (93.63%) | 0.85 |
| History of smoking or smoker | 4 (7.02%) | 53 (92.98%) | |
| Yes | 10 (6.90%) | 135 (93.10%) | 0.83 |
| No | 22 (6.38%) | 323 (93.62%) | |
| Yes | 8 (6.40%) | 341 (93.425) | 0.94 |
| No | 24 (6.58%) | 117 (93.60%) | |
| Yes | 6 (5.50%) | 103 (94.50%) | 0.62 |
| No | 26 (6.82%) | 355 (93.18%) | |
| Yes | 3 (4.62%) | 62 (95.38%) | 0.50 |
| No | 29 (6.82%) | 396 (93.18%) | |
| LSG | 26 (5.99%) | 408 (94.01%) | 0.178 |
| RYGB and others | 6 (10.71%) | 50 (89.29%) | |
| HDL (mmol/L) | 1.11 ± 0.18 | 1.13 ± 0.25 | 0.74 |
| LDL (mmol/L) | 3.02 ± 0.68 | 3.17 ± 0.92 | 0.44 |
| Trig (mmol/L) | 1.3 ± 0.64 | 1.48 ± 0.72 | 0.50 |
| TBili (μmol/L) | 9.4 ± 4.9 | 9.09 ± 4.74 | 0.71 |
| Pre-weight (kg) | 122 ± 24.14 | 123 ± 21 | 0.92 |
| Pre-height (m) | 1.6 ± 0.08 | 1.6 ± 0.09 | 0.44 |
| Pre-BMI (kg/m2) | 47.52 ± 7.13 | 46.06 ± 6.9 | 0.24 |
| Post-weight (kg) | 80.73 ± 16.69 | 89.18 ± 21.9 | |
| Post-height (m) | 1.6 ± 0.09 | 1.6 ± 0.09 | |
| Post-BMI (kg/m2) | 31.4 ± 5.46 | 33.33 ± 7.52 | |
| TWL (%) | 0.33 ± 0.11 | 0.27 ± 0.12 | |
| EBMIL% | 0.72 ± 0.23 | 0.63 ± 0.31 | |
The bold values showed statistical significance (A p < 0.05 was considered significant).
P-value shows the statistical significance as obtained from the independent t-test and chi-square tests for continuous and categorical variables, respectively.
Figure 1Demonstrates the statistically significant relationship between TWL (%) and follow-up intervals, p < 0.0001.
Figure 2Depicts the statistically significant relationship between Excess BMI loss (%) and follow-up intervals, p < 0.0001.