Literature DB >> 33194104

Validation of a Practical Forearm Supination Strength Measurement Technique in the Large Sample Cohort.

Francesco Luceri1, Davide Cucchi2, Ivan Pichierri3,4, Carlo Eugenio Zaolino3, Alessandra Menon3,5, Joseph Martin Nikhil6, Paolo Angelo Arrigoni3,4, Pietro Simone Randelli3,5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The strength of forearm in pronation and supination (P/S) is an important clinical assessment during pre-operative examination as well as in post-operative evaluation. Many clinical trials concerning the measurement of forearm P/S strength were performed using a dynamometer fixed on the wall. The aim of this study was to bring out a simple and reliable technique for the measurement of P/S strength using a dynamometer manually supported and stabilized by an examiner. We hypothesized that there are no differences in evaluation of elbow P/S strength using the dynamometer fixed or the dynamometer stabilized by an operator in healthy people.
METHODS: The study was performed on a cross-sectional cohort of 100 healthy subjects without any history of injuries or previous surgery of the upper limbs. Isometric forearm P/S strengths were measured on the dominant and non-dominant forearms, using the dynamometer fixed on a table, and using the same dynamometer kept by an operator. The measurements were repeated in triplicate at 45°, 90° and 120° of elbow flexion in both upper limbs for all patients.
RESULTS: A total of 100 subjects (50 females, 50 males) were included in the study group. The mean age was 46.5 years (range 25-52 years). Female and male subjects showed no significant differences concerning the mean age (F/M ratio 0.50/0.50). The mean body mass index of all participants was 24.34 ± 3.66 kg/m2.No significant statistics difference was reported between the P/S strength measured using the two detection methods in our study group (45°, 90° and 120° of elbow flexion and both upper limbs).
CONCLUSION: The manually stabilized technique is a valid and reliable technique to assess the P/S strength of the forearm. This is a simple and effective method that may be reproduced in our daily clinical practice as well as in sportive practice. © Indian Orthopaedics Association 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biceps; Digital dynamometer; Forearm pronation–supination; Strength assessment

Year:  2020        PMID: 33194104      PMCID: PMC7609524          DOI: 10.1007/s43465-020-00239-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Orthop        ISSN: 0019-5413            Impact factor:   1.251


  22 in total

1.  Isometric and isokinetic endurance testing of the forearm complex.

Authors:  N E Motzkin; T D Cahalan; B F Morrey; K N An; E Y Chao
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1991 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Elbow flexion and forearm supination strength in a healthy population.

Authors:  Maximilian Kerschbaum; Nina Maziak; Elisabeth Böhm; Markus Scheibel
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Forearm Torque and Lifting Strength: Normative Data.

Authors:  Peter Axelsson; Per Fredrikson; Anders Nilsson; Jonny K Andersson; Johan Kärrholm
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2018-02-10       Impact factor: 2.230

Review 4.  Biceps tenodesis versus labral repair for superior labrum anterior-to-posterior tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Eoghan T Hurley; Daren Lim Fat; Cliona M Duigenan; J Chance Miller; Hannan Mullett; Cathal J Moran
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES AFTER DISTAL BICEPS BRACHII REPAIR: A CASE SERIES.

Authors:  Christine L Redmond; Tim Morris; Charissa Otto; Tanisha Zerella; John G Semmler; Taaibos Human; Joideep Phadnis; Gregory I Bain
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2016-12

6.  Diagnosis of superior labral lesions: comparison of noncontrast MRI with indirect MR arthrography in unexercised shoulders.

Authors:  Philip A Dinauer; Donald J Flemming; Kevin P Murphy; William C Doukas
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Modified anteromedial and anterolateral elbow arthroscopy portals show superiority to standard portals in guiding arthroscopic radial head screw fixation.

Authors:  Davide Cucchi; Paolo Arrigoni; Francesco Luceri; Alessandra Menon; Enrico Guerra; Lars Peter Müller; Christof Burger; Denise Eygendaal; Kilian Wegmann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Fracture Pattern Influences Radial Head Replacement Size Determination Among Experienced Elbow Surgeons.

Authors:  Davide Cucchi; Francesco Luceri; Andrea Celli; Alessandra Menon; Raul Barco; Kilian Wegmann; Pietro Randelli; Denise Eygendaal; Paolo Arrigoni
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 1.251

9.  New Methods to Assess Forearm Torque and Lifting Strength: Reliability and Validity.

Authors:  Peter Axelsson; Johan Kärrholm
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 2.230

10.  Distal biceps tendon rupture: advantages and drawbacks of the anatomical reinsertion with a modified double incision approach.

Authors:  L Tarallo; M Lombardi; F Zambianchi; A Giorgini; F Catani
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  2 in total

1.  Novel Radiographic Indexes for Elbow Stability Assessment: Part B-Preliminary Clinical Study.

Authors:  Francesco Luceri; Davide Cucchi; Paolo Angelo Arrigoni; Pietro Simone Randelli; Enrico Rosagrata; Carlo Eugenio Zaolino; Alessandra Menon; Mattia Radici; Andrea Zagarella; Michele Catapano; Mauro Battista Gallazzi
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 1.251

2.  Novel Radiographic Indexes for Elbow Stability Assessment: Part A-Cadaveric Validation.

Authors:  Francesco Luceri; Davide Cucchi; Paolo Angelo Arrigoni; Pietro Simone Randelli; Enrico Rosagrata; Carlo Eugenio Zaolino; Marco Viganò; Laura de Girolamo; Andrea Zagarella; Michele Catapano; Mauro Battista Gallazzi
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-05-09       Impact factor: 1.251

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.