Maximilian Kerschbaum1, Nina Maziak1, Elisabeth Böhm1, Markus Scheibel2. 1. Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Campus-Virchow/Campus-Mitte, Charité-Unversitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. 2. Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Campus-Virchow/Campus-Mitte, Charité-Unversitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. Electronic address: markus.scheibel@charite.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: Despite the lack of representative data of a healthy population, many clinical trials concerning the measurement of postoperative elbow flexion or forearm supination strength use the contralateral side as a control. We hypothesized that there are no differences in elbow flexion and supination strength between the dominant and nondominant sides in healthy volunteers. METHODS: The study was performed on a cross-sectional cohort of healthy subjects without any prior injuries or surgical interventions of the upper extremities. Isometric elbow flexion strength and supination strength were measured on both the dominant and nondominant sides. The results were analyzed for the entire group and subanalyzed for female vs. male, for different age groups, and according to handedness and regular practice of overhead sports. RESULTS: A total of 150 subjects (75 female and 75 male subjects; mean age, 44 ± 15 years [range, 18-72 years]) were included in this study. Within the entire collective, no significant differences concerning the elbow flexion strength between the dominant and nondominant sides could be detected, whereas the supination strength was 7% higher on the dominant side (P = .010). Women, right-hand-dominant subjects, and subjects who do not regularly practice overhead sports have a significant 8% higher supination strength on the dominant side compared with the nondominant side (P < .05). Left-hand-dominant subjects have an 8% higher elbow flexion strength on the nondominant right side (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Elbow flexion strength and forearm supination strength differ between the dominant and nondominant sides. The contralateral upper extremity cannot be used as a matched control without some adjustments.
BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: Despite the lack of representative data of a healthy population, many clinical trials concerning the measurement of postoperative elbow flexion or forearm supination strength use the contralateral side as a control. We hypothesized that there are no differences in elbow flexion and supination strength between the dominant and nondominant sides in healthy volunteers. METHODS: The study was performed on a cross-sectional cohort of healthy subjects without any prior injuries or surgical interventions of the upper extremities. Isometric elbow flexion strength and supination strength were measured on both the dominant and nondominant sides. The results were analyzed for the entire group and subanalyzed for female vs. male, for different age groups, and according to handedness and regular practice of overhead sports. RESULTS: A total of 150 subjects (75 female and 75 male subjects; mean age, 44 ± 15 years [range, 18-72 years]) were included in this study. Within the entire collective, no significant differences concerning the elbow flexion strength between the dominant and nondominant sides could be detected, whereas the supination strength was 7% higher on the dominant side (P = .010). Women, right-hand-dominant subjects, and subjects who do not regularly practice overhead sports have a significant 8% higher supination strength on the dominant side compared with the nondominant side (P < .05). Left-hand-dominant subjects have an 8% higher elbow flexion strength on the nondominant right side (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Elbow flexion strength and forearm supination strength differ between the dominant and nondominant sides. The contralateral upper extremity cannot be used as a matched control without some adjustments.
Authors: Bauke Kooistra; Navin Gurnani; Alexander Weening; Derek van Deurzen; Michel van den Bekerom Journal: Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil Date: 2021-07-03
Authors: Francesco Luceri; Davide Cucchi; Ivan Pichierri; Carlo Eugenio Zaolino; Alessandra Menon; Joseph Martin Nikhil; Paolo Angelo Arrigoni; Pietro Simone Randelli Journal: Indian J Orthop Date: 2020-08-28 Impact factor: 1.251