| Literature DB >> 33193751 |
Adriele Dandara Levorato Vinche1, Iván de-la-Cruz-Chacón2, Alma Rosa González-Esquinca2, Julhiany de Fátima da Silva1, Gisela Ferreira3, Daniela Carvalho Dos Santos3, Hans Garcia Garces3, Daniela Vanessa Moris de Oliveira4, Camila Marçon1, Ricardo de Souza Cavalcante1, Rinaldo Poncio Mendes1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Endemic systemic mycoses remain a health challenge, since these opportunistic diseases are increasingly infecting immunosuppressed patients. The simultaneous use of antifungal compounds and other drugs to treat infectious or non-infectious diseases has led to several interactions and undesirable effects. Thus, new antifungal compounds should be investigated. The present study aimed to evaluate the activity of liriodenine extracted from Annona macroprophyllata on agents of systemic mycoses, with emphasis on the genus Paracoccidioides.Entities:
Keywords: Antifungal compounds; Antimicrobial compounds; Liriodenine; Medicinal plants; Paracoccidioidomycosis; Systemic mycosis
Year: 2020 PMID: 33193751 PMCID: PMC7595607 DOI: 10.1590/1678-9199-JVATITD-2020-0023
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Venom Anim Toxins Incl Trop Dis ISSN: 1678-9180
Figure 1.Structure of liriodenine.
Figure 2.Molecular phylogenetic analysis by the maximum likelihood method using exon 2 of the gp 43 region. The evolutionary history was inferred using the maximum likelihood method based on the Kimura 2-parameter model. The tree with the highest log likelihood is shown. The percentage of trees in which the associated taxa clustered together is shown next to the branches. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per site. The analysis involved 11 nucleotide sequences. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA7. The species names were concordant with the latest accepted taxonomies for the species (old and recent species names).
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC) of liriodenine isolated from Annona macroprophyllata, evaluated in 17 fungal isolates.
| Liriodenine | Amphotericin B | Fluconazole | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fungi | MIC (μg.mL-1) | MFC (μg.mL-1) | MIC (μg.mL-1) | MFC (μg.mL-1) | MIC (μg.mL-1) | MFC (μg.mL-1) | |
|
| > 500 | > 500 | 0.5 | 1 | NP | NP | |
|
| 31.2 | 31.2 | 1 | 1 | NP | NP | |
|
| 62.5 | 62.5 | 1 | 1 | NP | NP | |
|
| > 500 | > 500 | 0.5 | 1 | NP | NP | |
|
| > 500 | > 500 | 1 | 1 | NP | NP | |
|
| > 500 | > 500 | 1 | 1 | NP | NP | |
|
| 250 | 500 | 0.5 | 1 | NP | NP | |
|
| > 500 | > 500 | 0.5 | 2 | NP | NP | |
|
| 1.95 | 3.90 | 1 | 1 | NP | NP | |
|
| > 500 | > 500 | 1 | 1 | NP | NP | |
|
| 125 | 250 | 1 | 1 | 0.25 | CC | |
|
| 125 | 500 | 1 | 1 | 16 | CC | |
|
| 250 | 500 | 0.125 | 0.125 | 1.0 | CC | |
|
| 250 | 500 | 1 | 1 | 64.0 | CC | |
|
| > 500 | > 500 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.0 | CC | |
|
| 62.5 | 125 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 8 | CC | |
|
| 62.5 | 125 | 1 | 1 | 4 | CC | |
NP: not performed because it is not the reference antifungal agent; CC: countless colonies.
Figure 3.Scanning electron microscopy of yeast-phase cells of standard Paracoccidioides brasiliensis (PB18) strain. (A-D) Cells not treated with liriodenine. (E-H) Cells treated with liriodenine at the MIC of 31.2 μg.mL-1. li: ligament; p: prolongation; jm: juxtaposed material.
Figure 4.Transmission electron microscopy of yeast-phase cells of the standard Paracoccidioides brasiliensis (Pb18) strain. (A-C) Cells not treated with liriodenine. (D-K) Cells treated with liriodenine at the MIC of 31.2 μg.mL-1. dv: dense vacuole; v: electron-lucent; nu: nucleus; mi: mitochondrion; cw: cell wall; fo: sickle shape.