| Literature DB >> 33193505 |
Shi-Cheng Shao1, Yan Luo1, Hans Jacquemyn2.
Abstract
Orchids are highly dependent on mycorrhizal fungi for seed germination and subsequent growth to a seedling as they provide essential carbon, water, and mineral nutrients to developing seeds. Although there is mounting evidence that orchid seeds are often colonized by multiple fungi simultaneously, most in vitro germination experiments focus on mycorrhizal monocultures and little is known about how mycorrhizal assemblages affect seed germination and growth of seedlings. In this study, we compared the effects of mycorrhizal monocultures and co-cultures on seed germination and seedling growth of the epiphytic orchid Dendrobium nobile. In situ baiting was used to isolate mycorrhizal fungi from protocorms for germination experiments. Germination experiments were conducted under two light regimes for 90 days. In total, five fungal strains were isolated from protocorms of D. nobile, indicating that the species was not highly specific to its fungal partners. Four strains (JC-01, JC-02, JC-04, and JC-05) belonged to the Serendipitaceae and one (JC-03) to the Tulasnellaceae. In vitro germination experiments showed that germination percentages were higher under light-dark conditions than under complete dark conditions, supporting previous findings that light facilitates germination in epiphytic orchids. While all strains were able to induce protocorm formation and growth into the seedling stage, large differences between fungal strains were observed. Co-cultures did not result in significantly higher seed germination percentages and seedling development than monocultures. Taken together, these results demonstrate that effects of fungal assemblages are not predictable from those of component species, and that more work is needed to better understand the role of fungal assemblages determining seed germination and subsequent growth under natural conditions.Entities:
Keywords: Serendipitaceae; Tulasnella; orchid mycorrhizal fungi; specificity; symbiotic seed germination
Year: 2020 PMID: 33193505 PMCID: PMC7644947 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.571426
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Figure 1Inflorescence and protocorms induced by in situ baiting of Dendrobium nobile in Paozhuqing (China). (A) Inflorescence of D. nobile (Photo by Dr. Liu Qiang); (B) Dendrobium nobile protocorms induced by modified in situ baiting; (C) Magnification of protocorm under stereoscope; (D) Seedling formation after dual inoculation with fungal strains JC-01 and JC-03.
Developmental stages and features of symbiotic seed germination of Dendrobium nobile (modified on the basis of Arditti, 1967).
| Seed germination stage | Characteristic description |
|---|---|
| 0 | No germination |
| 1 | Imbibed seed, swollen and still covered by testa |
| 2 | Protocorm formation and development (rupture of testa, appearance of protomeristem = germination) |
| 3 | Seedling formation and development (emergence of first leaf and further developed more leaves) |
Figure 2Consensus trees of Sebacinales (A) and Tulasnellaceae (B) inferred from Maximum parsimony (MP) and Bayesian methods using nrDNA-ITS. Numbers along the nodes are MP and Bayesian inference (BI) support values. Node tips show NCBI accession numbers followed by fungal species name and host species. Thelephora sp. in tree A and Dacrymyces sp. in tree B were selected as outgroups.
The values presented with factor effect on protocorm formation and seedling development are produced by Generalized Linear Models.
| 20 days | 50 days | 90 days | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Factor (F) | Protocorm | Seedlings | Protocorm | Seedlings | Protocorm | Seedlings |
| Fungal treatment | 23.353 | null | 24.966 | 10.071 | 13.736 | 11.416 |
| Light | 0.007 | null | 0.875 | 53.652 | 24.688 | 84.698 |
| Fungal treatment x Light | 0.148 | null | 0.608 | 10.321 | 1.966 | 11.416 |
p < 0.0001.
Figure 3The effects of fungal inoculation and illumination on symbiotic seed germination of D. nobile at different times after sowing. The significance among fungal treatments was shown by different capital letter under light photoperiod conditions and lower case letter under dark conditions. Asterisks denote statistical differences between light/dark treatments according to multiple comparisons (***p < 0.0001, **p < 0.001, *p < 0.05). (A) Protocorm formation at 20 days; (B) protocorms and advanced seedlings with leaves and roots at 90 days; (C) protocorm formation at 50 days; (D) seedling percentage at 50 days; (E) protocorm formation at 90 days; (F) seedling percentage at 90 days. CK, control test; JC-01: MH500251; JC-03: MH500253; JC-05: MH500255; JC-01 + JC-03: dual inoculation by MH500251 and MH500253; JC-03 + JC-05: dual inoculation by MH500253 and MH500255; JC-01 + JC-03 + JC-05: tri-inoculation by MH500251, MH500253 and MH500255; and CY: KM226996.1.