Literature DB >> 26105186

Continent-wide distribution in mycorrhizal fungi: implications for the biogeography of specialized orchids.

Belinda J Davis1, Ryan D Phillips2, Magali Wright3, Celeste C Linde4, Kingsley W Dixon5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Although mycorrhizal associations are predominantly generalist, specialized mycorrhizal interactions have repeatedly evolved in Orchidaceae, suggesting a potential role in limiting the geographical range of orchid species. In particular, the Australian orchid flora is characterized by high mycorrhizal specialization and short-range endemism. This study investigates the mycorrhizae used by Pheladenia deformis, one of the few orchid species to occur across the Australian continent. Specifically, it examines whether P. deformis is widely distributed through using multiple fungi or a single widespread fungus, and if the fungi used by Australian orchids are widespread at the continental scale.
METHODS: Mycorrhizal fungi were isolated from P. deformis populations in eastern and western Australia. Germination trials using seed from western Australian populations were conducted to test if these fungi supported germination, regardless of the region in which they occurred. A phylogenetic analysis was undertaken using isolates from P. deformis and other Australian orchids that use the genus Sebacina to test for the occurrence of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) in eastern and western Australia. KEY
RESULTS: With the exception of one isolate, all fungi used by P. deformis belonged to a single fungal OTU of Sebacina. Fungal isolates from eastern and western Australia supported germination of P. deformis. A phylogenetic analysis of Australian Sebacina revealed that all of the OTUs that had been well sampled occurred on both sides of the continent.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of a widespread fungal OTU in P. deformis enables a broad distribution despite high mycorrhizal specificity. The Sebacina OTUs that are used by a range of Australian orchids occur on both sides of the continent, demonstrating that the short-range endemism prevalent in the orchids is not driven by fungal species with narrow distributions. Alternatively, a combination of specific edaphic requirements and a high incidence of pollination by sexual deception may explain biogeographic patterns in southern Australian orchids.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Australia; Orchidaceae; Pheladenia deformis; Sebacina; biogeography; fungi; mycorrhizae; specialized; symbiosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26105186      PMCID: PMC4549956          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcv084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  35 in total

Review 1.  Ecology of mycorrhizae: a conceptual framework for complex interactions among plants and fungi.

Authors:  M F Allen; W Swenson; J I Querejeta; L M Egerton-Warburton; K K Treseder
Journal:  Annu Rev Phytopathol       Date:  2003-04-29       Impact factor: 13.078

2.  Pollinator specificity, floral odour chemistry and the phylogeny of Australian sexually deceptive Chiloglottis orchids: implications for pollinator-driven speciation.

Authors:  Rod Peakall; Daniel Ebert; Jacqueline Poldy; Russell A Barrow; Wittko Francke; Colin C Bower; Florian P Schiestl
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 10.151

3.  Highly diverse and spatially heterogeneous mycorrhizal symbiosis in a rare epiphyte is unrelated to broad biogeographic or environmental features.

Authors:  Tyler R Kartzinel; Dorset W Trapnell; Richard P Shefferson
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 6.185

4.  Congruent species delineation of Tulasnella using multiple loci and methods.

Authors:  Celeste C Linde; Ryan D Phillips; Michael D Crisp; Rod Peakall
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 10.151

5.  A narrowly endemic photosynthetic orchid is non-specific in its mycorrhizal associations.

Authors:  Madhav Pandey; Jyotsna Sharma; Donald Lee Taylor; Vern L Yadon
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 6.185

6.  Frontier mutualism: coevolutionary patterns at the northern range limit of the leaf-cutter ant-fungus symbiosis.

Authors:  Ulrich G Mueller; Alexander S Mikheyev; Scott E Solomon; Michael Cooper
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Mutualistic mycorrhiza in orchids: evidence from plant-fungus carbon and nitrogen transfers in the green-leaved terrestrial orchid Goodyera repens.

Authors:  Duncan D Cameron; Jonathan R Leake; David J Read
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 10.151

8.  Analysis of network architecture reveals phylogenetic constraints on mycorrhizal specificity in the genus Orchis (Orchidaceae).

Authors:  Hans Jacquemyn; Vincent Merckx; Rein Brys; Daniel Tyteca; Bruno P A Cammue; Olivier Honnay; Bart Lievens
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 10.151

9.  Caught in the act: pollination of sexually deceptive trap-flowers by fungus gnats in Pterostylis (Orchidaceae).

Authors:  Ryan D Phillips; Daniela Scaccabarozzi; Bryony A Retter; Christine Hayes; Graham R Brown; Kingsley W Dixon; Rod Peakall
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-12-22       Impact factor: 4.357

10.  Intraspecific ITS variability in the kingdom fungi as expressed in the international sequence databases and its implications for molecular species identification.

Authors:  R Henrik Nilsson; Erik Kristiansson; Martin Ryberg; Nils Hallenberg; Karl-Henrik Larsson
Journal:  Evol Bioinform Online       Date:  2008-05-26       Impact factor: 1.625

View more
  13 in total

1.  Orchid conservation: making the links.

Authors:  Michael F Fay; Thierry Pailler; Kingsley W Dixon
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Orchid conservation: further links.

Authors:  Michael F Fay
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Inorganic phosphorus nutrition in green-leaved terrestrial orchid seedlings.

Authors:  Belinda Davis; Wei-Han Lim; Hans Lambers; Kingsley W Dixon; David J Read
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 5.040

4.  Matching symbiotic associations of an endangered orchid to habitat to improve conservation outcomes.

Authors:  Noushka Reiter; Ann C Lawrie; Celeste C Linde
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Population structure of an orchid mycorrhizal fungus with genus-wide specificity.

Authors:  M P Ruibal; Y Triponez; L M Smith; R Peakall; C C Linde
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Orchid diversity: Spatial and climatic patterns from herbarium records.

Authors:  Anne C Gaskett; Rachael V Gallagher
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Environmental drivers for cheaters of arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis in tropical rainforests.

Authors:  Sofia I F Gomes; Peter M van Bodegom; Vincent S F T Merckx; NadejdaA Soudzilovskaia
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 10.151

Review 8.  Orchid Reintroduction Based on Seed Germination-Promoting Mycorrhizal Fungi Derived From Protocorms or Seedlings.

Authors:  Da-Ke Zhao; Marc-André Selosse; Limin Wu; Yan Luo; Shi-Cheng Shao; Yong-Ling Ruan
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 9.  Orchid Root Associated Bacteria: Linchpins or Accessories?

Authors:  Jaspreet Kaur; Jyotsna Sharma
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 5.753

10.  Fungal networks and orchid distribution: new insights from above- and below-ground analyses of fungal communities.

Authors:  Lorenzo Pecoraro; Tancredi Caruso; Lei Cai; Vijai Kumar Gupta; Zhong-Jian Liu
Journal:  IMA Fungus       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 3.515

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.