| Literature DB >> 33186031 |
Anja Haags1,2,3, Alexander Reichmann4, Qitang Fan5, Larissa Egger4, Hans Kirschner6, Tim Naumann5, Simon Werner5, Tobias Vollgraff5, Jörg Sundermeyer5, Lukas Eschmann7, Xiaosheng Yang1,2,3, Dominik Brandstetter4, François C Bocquet1,2, Georg Koller4, Alexander Gottwald6, Mathias Richter6, Michael G Ramsey4, Michael Rohlfing7, Peter Puschnig4, J Michael Gottfried5, Serguei Soubatch1,2, F Stefan Tautz1,2,3.
Abstract
We revisit the question of kekulene's aromaticity by focusing on the electronic structure of its frontier orbitals as determined by angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy. To this end, we have developed a specially designed precursor, 1,4,7(2,7)-triphenanthrenacyclononaphane-2,5,8-triene, which allows us to prepare sufficient quantities of kekulene of high purity directly on a Cu(111) surface, as confirmed by scanning tunneling microscopy. Supported by density functional calculations, we determine the orbital structure of kekulene's highest occupied molecular orbital by photoemission tomography. In agreement with a recent aromaticity assessment of kekulene based solely on C-C bond lengths, we conclude that the π-conjugation of kekulene is better described by the Clar model rather than a superaromatic model. Thus, by exploiting the capabilities of photoemission tomography, we shed light on the question which consequences aromaticity holds for the frontier electronic structure of a π-conjugated molecule.Entities:
Keywords: ARPES; DFT; STM; aromaticity; kekulene; photoemission
Year: 2020 PMID: 33186031 PMCID: PMC7690051 DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.0c06798
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Nano ISSN: 1936-0851 Impact factor: 18.027
Figure 1(a) Synthesis of the kekulene precursor 5 by a four-step reaction sequence starting with 9,10-dihydrophenanthrene (1), and the on-surface reaction of 5 leading to kekulene (6). C–C bonds of 6 formed upon cyclodehydrogenation are marked in red. The two nonequivalent benzene rings of 6 are labeled as A and B, respectively. (b) Molecular and lattice structure obtained from single-crystal XRD analysis of 5 (thermal ellipsoids are shown at the 50% probability level and hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity). The red dashed lines in (b) represent the shortest intermolecular C–C distance (3.34 Å).
Figure 2Structural information from STM and DFT. (a and b) STM micrographs of the precursor (5, U = −2.8 V, I = 0.11 nA) and kekulene (6, U = −2.9 V, I = 0.26 nA) on Cu(111), respectively, measured at 100 K. Space-filling molecular models are added to illustrate nonplanar and planar molecular conformations of 5 and 6, respectively. The two different appearances of kekulene in (b) are caused by a slight motion of some molecules, presumably induced by the STM tip. (c and d) Side and top views, respectively, of the relaxed adsorption geometry of kekulene/Cu(111) as obtained by DFT. HOMA values H and the bond lengths of adsorbed kekulene are color coded in red and blue, respectively.
Figure 3Angle-resolved photoemission data of kekulene/Cu(111) from experiment and theory. (a) ARPES band map along the [11̅0] direction in an energy range of about 2 eV below the Fermi edge. The black line shows an angle-integrated energy distribution curve. (b) Density of states projected onto substrate (orange) and molecular p states (black) from DFT. (c and d) Experimental and simulated momentum maps at the respective binding energies of the HOMO as indicated by the dashed lines in (a) and (b). Photoemission was excited by p-polarized light of 35 eV photon energy.
Figure 4Comparison of experimental and simulated azimuthal ARPES intensity profiles of the kekulene HOMO. (a) Azimuthal profiles of the experiment (full symbols) and the DFT calculation of kekulene/Cu(111) (open symbols), extracted from the momentum maps shown in panels (d) and (e), respectively. (b) Simulated profiles from DFT gas-phase calculations of kekulene in the Clar geometry (full symbols) and superaromatic geometry (open symbols). The corresponding maps are shown in panels (f) and (g). (c) Simulated profiles from a Hückel model in which the coupling between inner and outer annulenes is set to t = −3.5 eV (full symbols) and to t = 0 (open symbols). The corresponding maps are shown in panels (h) and (i). Nonequivalent intensity lobes are labeled as L1 and L2. White lines in the momentum maps show the area used for intensity integration.
Figure 5The frontier electronic structure of kekulene. (a and b) Nodal structure of the two degenerate orbitals comprising the HOMO, denoted HOMO and HOMO, respectively, calculated with the Hückel model. (c) Chemical structure drawing of kekulene in the Clar model with six inequivalent C–C bonds labeled as a to f. (d) Charge density distribution of the HOMO (Hückel model). (e and f) Correlation between the C–C bond lengths of gas-phase kekulene as determined from DFT and a normalized bond order parameter from Hückel theory taking into account either all 24 occupied π-orbitals or only the degenerate HOMO (m = 23 to 24) orbital. Details are given in the text.