Iago Pozo1, Zsolt Majzik2, Niko Pavliček2, Manuel Melle-Franco3, Enrique Guitián1, Diego Peña1, Leo Gross2, Dolores Pérez1. 1. Centro Singular de Investigación en Química Biolóxica e Materiais Moleculares (CIQUS) and Departamento de Química Orgánica , Universidade de Santiago de Compostela , 15782 Santiago de Compostela , Spain. 2. IBM Research-Zürich , 8803 Rüschlikon , Switzerland. 3. CICECO, Aveiro Institute of Materials, Department of Chemistry , University of Aveiro , 3810-193 Aveiro , Portugal.
Abstract
Four decades after the first (and only) reported synthesis of kekulene, this emblematic cycloarene has been obtained again through an improved route involving the construction of a key synthetic intermediate, 5,6,8,9-tetrahydrobenzo[m]tetraphene, by means of a double Diels-Alder reaction between styrene and a versatile benzodiyne synthon. Ultra-high-resolution AFM imaging of single molecules of kekulene and computational calculations provide additional support for a molecular structure with a significant degree of bond localization in accordance with the resonance structure predicted by the Clar model.
Four decades after the first (and only) reported synthesis of kekulene, this emblematic cycloarene has been obtained again through an improved route involving the construction of a key synthetic intermediate, 5,6,8,9-tetrahydrobenzo[m]tetraphene, by means of a double Diels-Alder reaction between styrene and a versatile benzodiyne synthon. Ultra-high-resolution AFM imaging of single molecules of kekulene and computational calculations provide additional support for a molecular structure with a significant degree of bond localization in accordance with the resonance structure predicted by the Clar model.
Cycloarenes[1] constitute a fascinating class of polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbons
(PAHs) that have attracted the scientific community for decades due
to the singularity of their molecular and electronic structures.[2] They serve as ideal platforms to investigate
fundamental questions around the concept of aromaticity and, in particular,
those related with the π-electron distribution in complex aromatic
systems.[3] Recently, renewed attention to
cycloarenes has arisen since they serve as models for graphene pores.[4] Kekulene (1) is probably the best
studied member of this family. Its electronic structure has been the
subject of debate for decades,[5] the Clar
model 1a and the annulenoid Kekule structure 1b being of special interest (Figure ). In fact, properties such as superaromaticity[6,7] have been initially attributed to this molecule, associated with
hypothetically representative annulenoid structures such as 1b, comprising two concentric [4n+2] π-electron
circuits.
Figure 1
Clar (1a) and Kekule annulenoid (1b)
structures of kekulene.
Clar (1a) and Kekule annulenoid (1b)
structures of kekulene.While many theoretical
studies on the electronic structure of cycloarenes
have been reported, the experimental study of their properties has
been limited due to the extremely challenging synthesis of this kind
of planar, cata-condensed aromatic macrocyclic systems.[2] In fact, the synthesis and characterization of
kekulene by Staab and Diederich in 1978[1,8] is considered
to be a landmark achievement in the field of aromatic chemistry. Only
two additional nearly planar, unsubstituted cycloarenes, cyclo[d,e,d,e,e,d,e,d,e,e]decakisbenzene[9] and septulene,[10] have been synthesized
so far, while substituted analogues of kekulene and of the higher
homologue, nonplanar octulene, have been recently accessed taking
advantage of their higher solubility.[11] However, Staab and Diederich’s synthesis of the parent kekulene
(Scheme ) remains
unsurpassed, and apparently unrepeated, since the only available experimental
studies on 1 are those reported by this group 40 years
ago.[1,8,12]
Scheme 1
Synthetic
Approach to Kekulene by Staab and Diederich[1,8a]
Our expertise and continuing interest in the
chemistry of polycyclic
aromatic compounds and nanographenes led us to turn our attention
to this captivating molecule. Thus, here we present our contribution
to the study of kekulene through three different yet related achievements:
the improved synthesis of 1 by means of the aryne-mediated
construction of a key synthetic intermediate, the single-molecule
imaging of this fascinating cycloarene by ultra-high-resolution atomic
force microscopy (AFM), and a computational study including the accurate
simulation of the experimentally observed AFM images.As shown
in Scheme , probably
the main drawback of the otherwise superb synthesis of 1 is the preparation of 5,6,8,9-tetrahydrobenzo[m]tetraphene (2).[13] The construction
of the key synthetic intermediate 2, far from being straightforward,
was reported to occur in four steps, involving relatively harsh reaction
conditions and in a poor overall 2.8% yield (Scheme a).[1] Our wide
experience in the application of bistriflate 5 and other
bisaryne precursors to the synthesis of diverse PAHs of interest[14,15] led us to envision an alternative approach to 2 through
a double Diels–Alder reaction involving two molecules of styrene
(3) and the 1,4-benzodiyne synthon 4, which
would be generated by fluoride-induced elimination from bistriflate 5,[16] which is currently commercially
available (Scheme b).
Scheme 2
(a) Staab and Diederich’s Synthesis of 2(1), and (b)
This Work’s Aryne-Based Retrosynthetic Approach to 2
(a) Staab and Diederich’s Synthesis of 2(1), and (b)
This Work’s Aryne-Based Retrosynthetic Approach to 2
Conditions: (i) conc. HNO3, Δ; (ii) PhCHO, piperidine;
(iii) H2, 90
atm, 10% Pd/C, Δ; (iv) Cu, conc. H2SO4, isoamyl nitrite.The participation of styrenes
as unconventional dienes in Diels–Alder
cycloadditions with arynes to yield dihydrophenanthrenes has been
previously reported, although these transformations are commonly complicated
by secondary reactions such as aryne-mediated dehydrogenation to give
phenanthrenes,[17] or by the concerted ene
reaction of the initial Diels–Alder adduct with a second aryne
equivalent to afford arylated products.[18] In our case, such a Diels–Alder/ene cascade would be particularly
problematic, since the ene-incorporated aryl moiety would contain ortho-disposed trimethylsilyl and triflate functionalities,
which are able to generate new aryne species and give rise, probably,
to oligomerization processes and complex reaction mixtures. Despite
these possible difficulties, we targeted the synthesis of 2 by reaction of styrene with 1,4-bisbenzyne precursor 5 under aryne-forming conditions (Scheme , Table ).
Scheme 3
Reaction of Bistriflate 5 with CsF in
the Presence of
Styrene
Table 1
Optimization of the
Reaction Conditionsa
entry
solvent
molar ratio 5:3:CsF
scale (mmol 5)
yield 2 + 6 (%)b
1
dioxane
1:5:10
0.2
17
2c
dioxane
1:5:10
0.2
11
3d
dioxane
1:5:10
0.2
–
4e
ACN
1:5:10
0.2
13
5
ACN
1:5:10
0.2
20
6
ACN
1:2:10
0.2
12
7f
ACN
1:25:10
0.2
23
8
ACN
1:5:6
0.2
20
9
ACN
1:5:6
1.4
22
10
ACN
1:5:6
6
26
11
ACN
1:5:6
19
28
Typical reaction
conditions: reflux
under Ar, 16 h, [5] = 0.05 M.
Yield of isolated product (∼2:3
mixture of 2 and 6).
18-crown-6 (120 mol%) was added.
TBAF was used as the source of fluoride.
Reaction conducted at room
temperature.
[5] = 0.01 M.
Typical reaction
conditions: reflux
under Ar, 16 h, [5] = 0.05 M.Yield of isolated product (∼2:3
mixture of 2 and 6).18-crown-6 (120 mol%) was added.TBAF was used as the source of fluoride.Reaction conducted at room
temperature.[5] = 0.01 M.Initial assays
were performed in refluxing dioxane using CsF as
the fluoride source, conditions that had been previously reported
for the unusual selective preparation of non-arylated 9,10-dihydrophenanthrene
by reaction of styrene with benzyne.[19] Encouragingly,
treatment of 5 with CsF in refluxing dioxane, in the
presence of excess 3, resulted in the formation of the
expected products 2 and 6, although in modest
yield (entry 1). Addition of 18-crown-6 (entry 2) or the use of TBAF
as fluoride source (entry 3) led to poorer results.The use
of acetonitrile (ACN) as solvent led to slightly better
yields (entry 5), and under these conditions, the molar ratio of 5:3:CsF was optimized (entries 5–8). Finally,
we proved that better yields were consistently obtained when the reaction
was performed on a higher scale (entries 8–11). The best results
were obtained by reaction of 5 (19–20 mmol) with
styrene (3) and CsF (in 1:5:6 molar ratio) in refluxing
acetonitrile, yielding a 2:3 mixture of tetrahydrobenzotetraphenes 2 and 6 in a reasonable 28% yield (entry 11).
The separation of both isomers was not easy, but it could be achieved
by semi-preparative supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC)[20] and also by sequential recrystallizations from
boiling methanol.These results can be considered highly remarkable,
since compound 2, a key intermediate in the synthesis
of kekulene (1), is obtained in just one step from commercially
available
materials under mild reaction conditions and with a 4-fold increased
yield with respect to that of the previously reported synthesis.Remarkably, the only isolable compounds detected in the crude reaction
mixtures were 2, 6, and excess styrene (3).[20] Products derived either from
dehydrogenation of 2/6 or from Diels–Alder/ene
cascade processes were not observed.[21] However,
the formation of insoluble oligomers or polymers derived from aryne-based
side reactions cannot be ruled out. The mechanism proposed for the
formation of 2 (and 6) involves two probably
sequential Diels–Alder/H-migration processes. The detection
of the functionalized dihydrophenanthrene 8 in some experiments
strongly suggests that the first Diels–Alder reaction of styrene
with monoaryne 7 and the subsequent H-migration occur
prior to the generation of the second arynic insaturation
in 9 (Scheme ). Once compound 2 was conveniently prepared,
we proceeded to complete the synthesis of kekulene (1). After attempting some new synthetic alternatives based on metal-catalyzed
couplings and/or olefin metathesis/isomerization reactions, we decided
to rely on the firmly established route described by Diederich and
Staab,[1,8] which in our hands was perfectly reproducible,
even under significantly lower scale conditions.
Scheme 4
Mechanistic Proposal
for the Formation of 2/6
With kekulene (1) in hand, we identified
the opportunity
to visualize its molecular structure by ultra-high-resolution AFM,[22] a state-of-the-art technique for the single-molecule
study of planar, conjugated systems. As recently demonstrated, this
technique, in combination with scanning tunneling microscopy (STM),
has become a powerful tool for the elucidation and study of individual
molecules.[23] In order to increase the sublimation
rate with respect to the fragmentation rate, the material was sublimated
by rapid heating[24a] from a Si wafer[24b] onto a Cu(111) substrate, holding the sample
at T = 10 K during deposition. The large size and
thus high sublimation temperature of kekulene were expected to result
in fragmentation, and, in fact, the preparation resulted mostly in
small and often mobile molecules on the surface. However, we found
a few molecules of the expected hexagonal shape and size of kekulene.
Constant-height AFM images of the molecule adsorbed on Cu(111) with
a CO-functionalized tip[22,25−28] were recorded at different heights (Figure ), with decreasing tip-to-sample distance
in Figure a–c.
Corresponding Laplace-filtered images are shown in Figure d–f, respectively. From
the AFM images, the molecular structure of kekulene (1) was resolved. In addition, details of the contrast can be related
to bond order. Resolving the bond-order-related contrast is challenging
at the periphery of molecules because of the nonplanar background
from van der Waals and electrostatic forces.[27,29] However, bonds that experience similar background forces are comparable,
allowing qualitative resolution of bond-order differences. Increased
bond order results in brighter appearance at moderate tip heights
and shortened appearance of bonds at small tip heights.[27] In the case of kekulene (1), the
peripheral C(H)–C(H) bonds appear as the overall brightest
bonds at moderate tip height, i.e., in Figure a,b, and as the shortest bonds at small tip
height, i.e., in Figure c. Both observations indicate that these are the bonds of the highest
bond order within the kekulene structure, which is in agreement with
previous experimental evidence obtained by X-ray diffraction (XRD)
studies of single crystals of 1.[8b]
Figure 2
Experimental
AFM images of kekulene (1) on Cu(111).
(a–c) Constant-height AFM images with a CO-functionalized tip,
amplitude A = 1 Å, sample voltage V = 0 V. We approached the tip by z = 1.6 Å
in (a), 1.9 Å in (b), and 2.2 Å in (c) with respect to the
STM set point of V = 0.1 V, I =
1 pA on the bare Cu(111) surface. (d–f) Corresponding Laplace-filtered
images.
Experimental
AFM images of kekulene (1) on Cu(111).
(a–c) Constant-height AFM images with a CO-functionalized tip,
amplitude A = 1 Å, sample voltage V = 0 V. We approached the tip by z = 1.6 Å
in (a), 1.9 Å in (b), and 2.2 Å in (c) with respect to the
STM set point of V = 0.1 V, I =
1 pA on the bare Cu(111) surface. (d–f) Corresponding Laplace-filtered
images.To gain further insight into the
interpretation of the AFM images
in connection with the molecular structure of 1, we computed
the kekulene molecule both in the gas phase and on the Cu(111) surface
and performed simulations of AFM images.[20] Calculations in the gas phase at the B3LYP-def2-TZVP level[30] reveal that the molecule possesses D3 symmetry since the hydrogen atoms
of the inner cavity or pore present a slight distortion out of the
molecular plane due to steric hindrance. Remarkably, the calculated
C–C bond distances reproduce the experimental solid-state XRD
values within 0.01 Å (Figure ). This bonding pattern, which is also reproduced
by on-surface calculations, matches perfectly the predictions of the
π-sextet rule[31] and supports the
Clar model 1a, with the highest possible number of disjoint
aromatic π-sextets (six), as the most representative structure
of kekulene. Thus, despite its 48 π electrons (6n π electrons), kekulene is far from being “fully benzenoid”,
as the π electrons are not highly delocalized. In fact, 1 possesses an unusually high calculated HOMO–LUMO
gap of 3.55 eV (B3LYP-def2-TZVP level), similar to that calculated
for the much smaller anthracene molecule (3.56 eV). Finally, simulations
of the AFM images were performed with a Molecular Mechanics (MM) model
as implemented in the Probe Particle Model (PPM) software.[20,28,32] We computed images with an experimental
amplitude of 1.0 Å and with different binding constants, k, ranging from 0.15 to 0.60 N/m, and uncharged, monopole
and quadrupole tips. The best match to the experimental images was
achieved by a d-like quadrupole
tip[33] with Qd = −0.25 and a bending constant
of k = 0.35 N/m (see Figure ).[34]
Figure 4
(a) Molecular structure of kekulene (1) computed at
the B3LYP-def2-TZVP level in vacuum. (b) Experimental structure from
XRD, C2/c space group symmetry.
The colors grade with distance from 1.33 Å (red) to 1.40 Å
(white) and to 1.47 Å (blue). Bond lengths are in Å.
Figure 3
PPM-simulated
AFM images with an amplitude of A = 1 Å computed
with a PBE QM/MM electrostatic potential interacting
with a classical d-like quadrupole
tip (Qd = −0.25 e–/A2) with a bending stiffness of 0.35 N/m
at z = 3.4 Å in (a), 3.3 Å in (b), and
3 Å in (c) with respect to the molecular plane. All distances
are in Å.
PPM-simulated
AFM images with an amplitude of A = 1 Å computed
with a PBE QM/MM electrostatic potential interacting
with a classical d-like quadrupole
tip (Qd = −0.25 e–/A2) with a bending stiffness of 0.35 N/m
at z = 3.4 Å in (a), 3.3 Å in (b), and
3 Å in (c) with respect to the molecular plane. All distances
are in Å.(a) Molecular structure of kekulene (1) computed at
the B3LYP-def2-TZVP level in vacuum. (b) Experimental structure from
XRD, C2/c space group symmetry.
The colors grade with distance from 1.33 Å (red) to 1.40 Å
(white) and to 1.47 Å (blue). Bond lengths are in Å.In conclusion, this work provides a significant
contribution to
the synthesis of kekulene (1) based on the improved preparation
of the key intermediate 5,6,8,9-tetrahydrobenzo[m]tetraphene (2) by means of aryne chemistry. The modified
protocol has been applied to the actual synthesis of 1, which, to the best of our knowledge, had not been synthesized nor
experimentally studied since the seminal work by Staab and Diederich
in the early 1980s. With this material in hand, the structure of individual
molecules of kekulene (1) was nicely resolved by ultra-high-resolution
AFM. The computational study of kekulene (1) in vacuum
and on the Cu(111) surface and the successful simulation of the experimental
single-molecule AFM images provided further evidence of a bonding
pattern for kekulene which matches with the molecular structure predicted
by Clar’s π-sextet rule.
Authors: Leo Gross; Bruno Schuler; Niko Pavliček; Shadi Fatayer; Zsolt Majzik; Nikolaj Moll; Diego Peña; Gerhard Meyer Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2018-02-27 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Qitang Fan; Simon Werner; Jalmar Tschakert; Daniel Ebeling; André Schirmeisen; Gerhard Hilt; Wolfgang Hieringer; J Michael Gottfried Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2018-06-05 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Shigeki Kawai; Ville Haapasilta; Benjamin D Lindner; Kazukuni Tahara; Peter Spijker; Jeroen A Buitendijk; Rémy Pawlak; Tobias Meier; Yoshito Tobe; Adam S Foster; Ernst Meyer Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2016-09-13 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Marco Di Giovannantonio; Xuelin Yao; Kristjan Eimre; José I Urgel; Pascal Ruffieux; Carlo A Pignedoli; Klaus Müllen; Roman Fasel; Akimitsu Narita Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2020-07-02 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Anja Haags; Alexander Reichmann; Qitang Fan; Larissa Egger; Hans Kirschner; Tim Naumann; Simon Werner; Tobias Vollgraff; Jörg Sundermeyer; Lukas Eschmann; Xiaosheng Yang; Dominik Brandstetter; François C Bocquet; Georg Koller; Alexander Gottwald; Mathias Richter; Michael G Ramsey; Michael Rohlfing; Peter Puschnig; J Michael Gottfried; Serguei Soubatch; F Stefan Tautz Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2020-11-13 Impact factor: 18.027