| Literature DB >> 22563356 |
Teresa Weise1, Marco Kai, Anja Gummesson, Armin Troeger, Stephan von Reuß, Silvia Piepenborn, Francine Kosterka, Martin Sklorz, Ralf Zimmermann, Wittko Francke, Birgit Piechulla.
Abstract
Xanthomonas campestris is a phytopathogenic bacterium and causes many diseases of agricultural relevance. Volatiles were shown to be important in inter- and intraorganismic attraction and defense reactions. Recently it became apparent that also bacteria emit a plethora of volatiles, which influence other organisms such as invertebrates, plants and fungi. As a first step to study volatile-based bacterial-plant interactions, the emission profile of Xanthomonas c. pv. vesicatoria 85-10 was determined by using GC/MS and PTR-MS techniques. More than 50 compounds were emitted by this species, the majority comprising ketones and methylketones. The structure of the dominant compound, 10-methylundecan-2-one, was assigned on the basis of its analytical data, obtained by GC/MS and verified by comparison of these data with those of a synthetic reference sample. Application of commercially available decan-2-one, undecan-2-one, dodecan-2-one, and the newly synthesized 10-methylundecan-2-one in bi-partite Petri dish bioassays revealed growth promotions in low quantities (0.01 to 10 μmol), whereas decan-2-one at 100 μmol caused growth inhibitions of the fungus Rhizoctonia solani. Volatile emission profiles of the bacteria were different for growth on media (nutrient broth) with or without glucose.Entities:
Keywords: 10-methylundecan-2-one; Aspergillus nidulans; Fusarium solani; Rhizoctonia solani; Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria; growth inhibition and promotion; methylketones; volatile organic compound (VOC)
Year: 2012 PMID: 22563356 PMCID: PMC3343284 DOI: 10.3762/bjoc.8.65
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Beilstein J Org Chem ISSN: 1860-5397 Impact factor: 2.883
Figure 1Cocultivation of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria 85-10 with three fungi on different media. (A) Control experiment: Cultivation of Rhizoctonia solani on NB (day 4). (B) Cocultivation of X. c. pv. vesicatoria 85-10 on NB with Rhizoctonia solani (day 4). (C) Control experiment: Cultivation of Rhizoctonia solani on NBG (day 4). (D) Cocultivation of X. c. pv. vesicatoria 85-10 on NBG with Rhizoctonia solani (day 4). (E) Quantification of the inhibition of fungal mycelium growth during cocultivation with X. c. pv. vesicatoria 85-10, either grown on NB (black column) or NBG (grey column). Fungi: Aspergillus nidulans, Fusarium solani and Rhizoctonia solani. (4 dpi: four days after inoculation; NBG: nutrient broth (NB) II agar plus 1.1% glucose; *: growth significantly different compared to the control, p < 0.01 according to t-test).
Figure 2GC/MS-chromatogram (total ion current) of the headspace of X. c. pv. vesicatoria 85-10 grown in 10 L liquid nutrient broth without glucose. Compound labels are the same throughout this paper.
Figure 3Structures of compounds emitted by Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria 85-10. Compound labels are the same throughout this paper.
GC/MS analysis of Super-Q trapped volatiles emitted by Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria 85-10 grown in 10 L nutrient broth without glucose. Compound labels are the same throughout this paper.
| compound | retention index I | rel. area [%] | compound | |
| 8.23 | 778 | 0.7 | hexan-2-one | |
| 8.96 | 795 | 1.6 | 2-methylpropyl acetate | |
| 9.10 | 798 | 2.5 | ||
| 10.50 | 830 | tr | 5-methylhexan-2-one | |
| 11.28 | 848 | 5.4 | 2-methylbutyl acetate | |
| 11.40 | 851 | 2.4 | 3-methylbutyl acetate | |
| 11.67 | 857 | 0.2 | heptan-2-one | |
| 12.36 | 873 | 0.4 | 2,5-dimethylpyrazine | |
| 12.53 | 877 | 1.4 | 2-methylpropyl propionate | |
| 12.92 | 886 | 2.0 | ||
| 14.36 | 919 | 0.5 | 6-methylheptan-2-one | |
| 14.78 | 929 | tr | 5-methylheptan-2-one | |
| 15.14 | 938 | 3.9 | 2-methylbutyl propionate | |
| 15.26 | 940 | 0.7 | 3-methylbutyl propionate | |
| 15.88 | 955 | tr | octan-2-one | |
| 16.22 | 963 | 0.9 | 2,3,5-trimethylpyrazine | |
| 16.97 | 981 | 1.3 | hexyl acetate | |
| 17.37 | 990 | 2.5 | benzylalcohol | |
| 18.51 | 1018 | 4.0 | 3-methylbutyl 3-methylbutyrate | |
| 18.71 | 1022 | 3.7 | acetophenone | |
| 18.71 | 1022 | tr | 7-methyloctan-2-one | |
| 20.29 | 1061 | 5.6 | nonan-2-one | |
| 20.85 | 1074 | 8.4 | 2-phenylethanol | |
| 23.13 | 1131 | 52.8 | 8-methylnonan-2-one | |
| 23.37 | 1137 | 11.6 | 7-methylnonan-2-one | |
| 23.69 | 1145 | 1.4 | 8-methylnonan-2-ol | |
| 23.99 | 1152 | tr | 7-methylnonan-2-ol | |
| 24.60 | 1168 | 2.9 | decan-2-one | |
| 26.82 | 1224 | 5.5 | 2-phenylethyl acetate | |
| 27.31 | 1237 | 4.9 | 9-methyldecan-2-one | |
| 28.73 | 1274 | 19.7 | undecan-2-one | |
| 29.23 | 1287 | 1.4 | undecan-2-ol | |
| 29.56 | 1296 | 3.7 | 3,6-dimethyl-2-(3-methylbutyl)pyrazine | |
| 31.32 | 1344 | 100.0 | 10-methylundecan-2-one | |
| 31.58 | 1351 | 28.3 | 9-methylundecan-2-one | |
| 31.76 | 1356 | 4.9 | 10-methylundecan-2-ol | |
| 32.02 | 1363 | 4.0 | 9-methyundecan-2-ol | |
| 32.66 | 1380 | 1.4 | dodecan-2-one | |
| 34.68 | 1437 | 25.0 | geranylacetone | |
| 35.08 | 1448 | 1.7 | 11-methyldodecan-2-one | |
| 36.37 | 1485 | 17.5 | tridecan-2-one | |
| 36.76 | 1496 | tr | tridecan-2-ol | |
| 38.64 | 1552 | 15.7 | 12-methyltridecan-2-one | |
| 38.89 | 1559 | 8.8 | 11-methyltridecan-2-one | |
| 39.03 | 1563 | 3.0 | 12-methyltridecan-2-ol | |
| 39.27 | 1570 | 0.7 | 11-methyltridecan-2-ol | |
| 39.87 | 1589 | 1.4 | tetradecan-2-ol | |
| 42.02 | 1655 | 0.6 | 13-methyltetradecan-2-one | |
| 42.45 | 1668 | 17.7 | pentadecen-2-one | |
| 43.19 | 1691 | 2.1 | pentadecan-2-one | |
| 45.24 | 1757 | 0.5 | 14-methylpentadecan-2-one | |
| 45.48 | 1765 | 0.4 | 13-methylpentadecan-2-one | |
| 49.69 | 1907 | 29.8 | terpenoid? | |
| 17.76 | 1000 | 5.1 | 2-ethylhexanol | |
| 23.01 | 1128 | 8.8 | 2-ethylhexyl acetate | |
| 30.97 | 1334 | 17.8 | hydrocarbon | |
| 31.19 | 1340 | 20.5 | hydrocarbon | |
| 36.79 | 1497 | 6.7 | 2,4-bis- | |
Scheme 1Synthesis of 10-methylundecan-2-one (34) and 9-methylundecan-2-one (35).
Scheme 2Suggested biosynthesis of methylketones found in Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria 85-10.
Figure 4PTR–MS mass spectra of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria 85-10 volatiles after three days of incubation. (A) PTR–MS profile scan of headspace volatiles of X. c. pv. vesicatoria 85-10 growing in a Petri dish with NB. (B) PTR–MS profile scan of headspace volatiles of X. c. pv. vesicatoria 85-10 growing in a Petri dish with NBG. Spectra are normalized to the primary ion signal (H3O+) and are blank corrected (i.e., spectra recorded from the respective media without bacteria are subtracted). Signals that are significantly influenced by the growth media (5% confidence level) are labeled by *. Only significant signals (mean subtracted by standard deviation) higher than 10−6 are shown and a log-scale on the ordinate axis is used. Note that missing signals therefore do not necessarily indicate zero concentration but may also be due to the variance of the sample or a blank signal higher than the mean value.
Figure 5GC/MS analysis of volatiles emitted by Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria 85-10 grown on different media. (A) GC/MS-profile of headspace volatiles of X. c. pv. vesicatoria 85-10 grown on NB at day 3. (B) GC/MS-profile of headspace volatiles of X. c. pv. vesicatoria 85-10 grown on NBG at day 3. (C) GC/MS-profile of headspace volatiles of X. c. pv. vesicatoria 85-10 grown on NB at day 6. (D) GC/MS-profile of headspace volatiles of X. c. pv. vesicatoria 85-10 grown on NBG at day 6. (E) Registration of volatiles reaching a threshold level >1 × 105 when X. c. pv. vesicatoria 85-10 grew on NB (left circle) and NBG (right circle) (day 3: left panel, day 6: right panel). (F) Relative contribution (%) of the six major volatiles emitted by Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria 85-10 at day 3 and 6 grown on NB and NBG.
GC/MS analysis of SPME trapped volatiles emitted from Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria 85-10 grown in a Petri dish on NB or NBG.a
| compound | identification | NB | NBG | ||
| day 3 | day 6 | day 3 | day 6 | ||
| — | — | — | — | + | |
| — | + | + | — | + | |
| 8-methylnonan-2-one | +++ | +++ | + | +++ | |
| 7-methylnonan-2-one | ++ | ++ | — | + | |
| 8-methylnonan-2-ol | + | + | — | + | |
| 7-methylnonan-2-ol | + | — | — | — | |
| — | + | + | — | + | |
| decan-2-one | ++ | ++ | — | + | |
| 9-methyldecan-2-one | +++ | +++ | + | ++ | |
| — | + | + | — | — | |
| undecan-2-one | +++ | +++ | ++ | +++ | |
| — | + | + | + | + | |
| — | + | + | — | + | |
| 10-methylundecan-2-one | ++++ | ++++ | + | ++++ | |
| 9-methylundecan-2-one | ++++ | ++++ | ++ | +++ | |
| 10-methylundecan-2-ol | ++ | +++ | — | — | |
| 9-methylundecan-2-ol | ++ | + | — | + | |
| — | + | + | — | — | |
| dodecan-2-one | ++ | ++ | — | + | |
| geranylacetone | ++ | + | + | + | |
| 11-methyldodecan-2-one | ++ | ++ | — | + | |
| — | ++ | + | — | ++ | |
| — | + | — | — | — | |
| — | — | — | + | — | |
| tridecan-2-one | ++ | ++ | + | + | |
| — | + | + | — | + | |
| 12-methyltridecan-2-one | ++ | ++ | — | ++ | |
| 11-methyltridecan-2-one | ++ | ++ | — | ++ | |
| — | + | + | — | + | |
| — | + | + | — | + | |
| — | + | + | — | + | |
| — | + | + | — | + | |
| — | + | + | — | + | |
ax–x: compounds not identified; + = 0–105 counts; ++ = 105–106 counts; +++ = 106–107 counts; ++++ = 107–108 counts.
Figure 6Testing synthetic volatiles on the growth of Rhizoctonia solani. Synthetic commercially available and chemically synthesized ketones were dissolved in pentane and applied on a filter-paper disc in aliquots of 50 μL. The filter paper was placed in the opposite compartment to the R. solani in a bi-partite Petri dish. Defined dilutions or mixtures were applied every 24 h. At day 4 the diameter of the mycelium was measured and compared to control plates containing pentane. Positive values represent growth promotion and negative values growth inhibition of R. solani compared to the control. Data are from two experiments each replicated three times; the standard deviation is presented. (A) Decan-2-one (28) (black), undecan-2-one (31) (light grey), dodecan-2-one (38) (white), and 10-methylundecan-2-one (34) (dark grey) were individually applied in 50 μL aliquots each day (day 0 to day 4). (B) A mixture of 28, 31, 38 and 34 (6.7%:5.5%:0.6%:87.2%) was applied in 50 μL aliquots every day (day 0 to day 4).