BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There are great variations in how different technologists create the different imaging planes that can make a precise comparison of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging difficult. We aimed to identify a reference line for the coronal images on a computed tomography topography parallel to the posterior borderline of the brainstem (PB), matching standard coronal magnetic resonance imaging planes. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed computed tomography topography images of 80 consecutive patients to determine a computed tomography plane to match the PB on magnetic resonance imaging. These included the tuberculum sella (TS)-anterior arch of the C1 vertebra (C1), TS-tip of dens axis (D), dorsum sellae (DS)-C1 and DS-D. We compared these methods of prescribing the coronal computed tomography plane to coronal magnetic resonance imaging planes by measuring the angles between TS-C1 and PB, TS-M and PB, DS-C1 and PB, DS-D and PB on midsagittal brain magnetic resonance images. Bland-Altman plots were created to assess intra-observer reliability. RESULTS: The angles between the PB line and each topogram-determined line are as follows: TS-C1, 10.40° ± 4.86°; TS-D, 22.46° ± 5.23°; DS-C1, 3.01° ± 3.16°; and DS-D, 11.53° ± 4.10°. The mean angles between the DS-C1 and the PB lines were significantly smaller than the mean angle between any other line (DS-D, TS-C1, or TS-D, all P < 0.001). Intra-observer agreement regarding the angular position of the reformatted coronal images on the lateral scout image was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient >0.900, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The DS-C1 is almost parallel to the PB and easily identifiable on the lateral scout topography of brain computed tomography. Utilising the DS-C1 line as the baseline for brain computed tomography could allow better corroboration with coronal magnetic resonance imaging angulation.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There are great variations in how different technologists create the different imaging planes that can make a precise comparison of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging difficult. We aimed to identify a reference line for the coronal images on a computed tomography topography parallel to the posterior borderline of the brainstem (PB), matching standard coronal magnetic resonance imaging planes. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed computed tomography topography images of 80 consecutive patients to determine a computed tomography plane to match the PB on magnetic resonance imaging. These included the tuberculum sella (TS)-anterior arch of the C1 vertebra (C1), TS-tip of dens axis (D), dorsum sellae (DS)-C1 and DS-D. We compared these methods of prescribing the coronal computed tomography plane to coronal magnetic resonance imaging planes by measuring the angles between TS-C1 and PB, TS-M and PB, DS-C1 and PB, DS-D and PB on midsagittal brain magnetic resonance images. Bland-Altman plots were created to assess intra-observer reliability. RESULTS: The angles between the PB line and each topogram-determined line are as follows: TS-C1, 10.40° ± 4.86°; TS-D, 22.46° ± 5.23°; DS-C1, 3.01° ± 3.16°; and DS-D, 11.53° ± 4.10°. The mean angles between the DS-C1 and the PB lines were significantly smaller than the mean angle between any other line (DS-D, TS-C1, or TS-D, all P < 0.001). Intra-observer agreement regarding the angular position of the reformatted coronal images on the lateral scout image was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient >0.900, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The DS-C1 is almost parallel to the PB and easily identifiable on the lateral scout topography of brain computed tomography. Utilising the DS-C1 line as the baseline for brain computed tomography could allow better corroboration with coronal magnetic resonance imaging angulation.
Entities:
Keywords:
Tuberculum sella (TS); computed tomography (CT); reference line; technologist; tip of dens (D)
Authors: Cédric N Brun; Angi M Christensen; Milan Kravarski; Guillaume Gorincour; Wolf Schweitzer; Michael J Thali; Dominic Gascho; Gary M Hatch; Thomas D Ruder Journal: Forensic Sci Int Date: 2017-09-02 Impact factor: 2.395
Authors: André J W van der Kouwe; Thomas Benner; Bruce Fischl; Franz Schmitt; David H Salat; Martin Harder; A Gregory Sorensen; Anders M Dale Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2005-08-01 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Kenneth L Weiss; Hai Pan; Judd Storrs; William Strub; Jane L Weiss; Li Jia; O Petter Eldevik Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 3.825