Birju R Rao1, Neal W Dickert1,2, Alanna A Morris1, Candace D Speight1, Graham H Smith1, Supriya Shore3, Miranda A Moore4. 1. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine (B.R.R., N.W.D., A.A.M., C.D.S., G.H.S.), Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA. 2. Department of Epidemiology, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA (N.W.D.). 3. Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor (S.S.). 4. Department of Family and Preventive Medicine (M.A.M.), Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Discussions of medication costs between patients and clinicians are infrequent and often suboptimal. In the context of recently introduced drugs that are effective but expensive, patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction provide an ideal population to understand the perspectives of patients with chronic illness on medication cost and cost discussions. METHODS: To explore patients' perspectives on discussing out-of-pocket medication costs with clinicians, 49 adults, aged 44 to 70 years, with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction were recruited from outpatient heart failure clinics. Descriptive qualitative analysis was performed on open-ended text data. RESULTS: Participants who had prior medication-related cost discussions described their experience as generally positive, but about half of the participants had never had a cost discussion with their clinician. Most participants were open to cost discussions with clinicians and preferred that the clinician initiate discussions regarding medication cost. Importantly, these preferences held constant across reported levels of financial burden. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest a substantial willingness on the part of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction to incorporate cost discussions into their care and identify important aspects of these discussions for clinicians to consider when engaging in conversations where cost is relevant. Improving understanding about how to integrate patient preferences regarding cost discussions into clinical encounters is an important priority for advancing patient-centered care.
BACKGROUND: Discussions of medication costs between patients and clinicians are infrequent and often suboptimal. In the context of recently introduced drugs that are effective but expensive, patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction provide an ideal population to understand the perspectives of patients with chronic illness on medication cost and cost discussions. METHODS: To explore patients' perspectives on discussing out-of-pocket medication costs with clinicians, 49 adults, aged 44 to 70 years, with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction were recruited from outpatientheart failure clinics. Descriptive qualitative analysis was performed on open-ended text data. RESULTS:Participants who had prior medication-related cost discussions described their experience as generally positive, but about half of the participants had never had a cost discussion with their clinician. Most participants were open to cost discussions with clinicians and preferred that the clinician initiate discussions regarding medication cost. Importantly, these preferences held constant across reported levels of financial burden. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest a substantial willingness on the part of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction to incorporate cost discussions into their care and identify important aspects of these discussions for clinicians to consider when engaging in conversations where cost is relevant. Improving understanding about how to integrate patient preferences regarding cost discussions into clinical encounters is an important priority for advancing patient-centered care.
Entities:
Keywords:
decision-making; heart failure; outpatients; patient preferences; patient-centered care
Authors: Larry A Allen; Gregg C Fonarow; Li Liang; Phillip J Schulte; Frederick A Masoudi; John S Rumsfeld; P Michael Ho; Zubin J Eapen; Adrian F Hernandez; Paul A Heidenreich; Deepak L Bhatt; Eric D Peterson; Harlan M Krumholz Journal: Circulation Date: 2015-08-27 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Mark S Kremers; Stephen C Hammill; Charles I Berul; Christina Koutras; Jeptha S Curtis; Yongfei Wang; Jim Beachy; Laura Blum Meisnere; Del M Conyers; Matthew R Reynolds; Paul A Heidenreich; Sana M Al-Khatib; Ileana L Pina; Kathleen Blake; Mary Norine Walsh; Bruce L Wilkoff; Alaa Shalaby; Frederick A Masoudi; John Rumsfeld Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2013-02-09 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Lorraine S Wallace; Edwin S Rogers; Steven E Roskos; David B Holiday; Barry D Weiss Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Graham H Smith; Supriya Shore; Larry A Allen; David W Markham; Andrea R Mitchell; Miranda Moore; Alanna A Morris; Candace D Speight; Neal W Dickert Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2019-01-08 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Birju R Rao; Candace D Speight; Larry A Allen; Scott D Halpern; Yi-An Ko; Daniel D Matlock; Miranda A Moore; Alanna A Morris; Laura D Scherer; Mary C Thomson; Peter Ubel; Neal W Dickert Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2022-06-20 Impact factor: 6.106
Authors: Karalyn A Kiessling; Bradley E Iott; Jessica A Pater; Tammy R Toscos; Shauna R Wagner; Laura M Gottlieb; Tiffany C Veinot Journal: JAMIA Open Date: 2022-02-24