A Manca1, T Hortobágyi2, T J Carroll3, R M Enoka4, J P Farthing5, S C Gandevia6, D J Kidgell7, J L Taylor8, F Deriu9. 1. Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, Viale San Pietro 43/b, 07100, Sassari, Italy. 2. Center for Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. 3. Centre for Sensorimotor Performance, School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. 4. Department of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, USA. 5. University of Saskatchewan College of Kinesiology, Saskatoon, SK, Canada. 6. Neuroscience Research Australia (NeuRA), The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. 7. Department of Physiotherapy, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Science, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. 8. School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edit Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia. 9. Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, Viale San Pietro 43/b, 07100, Sassari, Italy. deriuf@uniss.it.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cross-education refers to increased motor output (i.e., force generation, skill) of the opposite, untrained limb following a period of unilateral exercise training. Despite extensive research, several aspects of the transfer phenomenon remain controversial. METHODS: A modified two-round Delphi online survey was conducted among international experts to reach consensus on terminology, methodology, mechanisms of action, and translational potential of cross-education, and to provide a framework for future research. RESULTS: Through purposive sampling of the literature, we identified 56 noted experts in the field, of whom 32 completed the survey, and reached consensus (75% threshold) on 17 out of 27 items. CONCLUSION: Our consensus-based recommendations for future studies are that (1) the term 'cross-education' should be adopted to refer to the transfer phenomenon, also specifying if transfer of strength or skill is meant; (2) functional magnetic resonance imaging, short-interval intracortical inhibition and interhemispheric inhibition appear to be promising tools to study the mechanisms of transfer; (3) strategies which maximize cross-education, such as high-intensity training, eccentric contractions, and mirror illusion, seem worth being included in the intervention plan; (4) study protocols should be designed to include at least 13-18 sessions or 4-6 weeks to produce functionally meaningful transfer of strength, and (5) cross-education could be considered as an adjuvant treatment particularly for unilateral orthopedic conditions and sports injuries. Additionally, a clear gap in views emerged between the research field and the purely clinical field. The present consensus statement clarifies relevant aspects of cross-education including neurophysiological, neuroanatomical, and methodological characteristics of the transfer phenomenon, and provides guidance on how to improve the quality and usability of future cross-education studies.
BACKGROUND: Cross-education refers to increased motor output (i.e., force generation, skill) of the opposite, untrained limb following a period of unilateral exercise training. Despite extensive research, several aspects of the transfer phenomenon remain controversial. METHODS: A modified two-round Delphi online survey was conducted among international experts to reach consensus on terminology, methodology, mechanisms of action, and translational potential of cross-education, and to provide a framework for future research. RESULTS: Through purposive sampling of the literature, we identified 56 noted experts in the field, of whom 32 completed the survey, and reached consensus (75% threshold) on 17 out of 27 items. CONCLUSION: Our consensus-based recommendations for future studies are that (1) the term 'cross-education' should be adopted to refer to the transfer phenomenon, also specifying if transfer of strength or skill is meant; (2) functional magnetic resonance imaging, short-interval intracortical inhibition and interhemispheric inhibition appear to be promising tools to study the mechanisms of transfer; (3) strategies which maximize cross-education, such as high-intensity training, eccentric contractions, and mirror illusion, seem worth being included in the intervention plan; (4) study protocols should be designed to include at least 13-18 sessions or 4-6 weeks to produce functionally meaningful transfer of strength, and (5) cross-education could be considered as an adjuvant treatment particularly for unilateral orthopedic conditions and sports injuries. Additionally, a clear gap in views emerged between the research field and the purely clinical field. The present consensus statement clarifies relevant aspects of cross-education including neurophysiological, neuroanatomical, and methodological characteristics of the transfer phenomenon, and provides guidance on how to improve the quality and usability of future cross-education studies.
Authors: Tjerk Zult; Alli Gokeler; Jos J A M van Raay; Reinoud W Brouwer; Inge Zijdewind; Jonathan P Farthing; Tibor Hortobágyi Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2018-09-04 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Tjerk Zult; Alli Gokeler; Jos J A M van Raay; Reinoud W Brouwer; Inge Zijdewind; Jonathan P Farthing; Tibor Hortobágyi Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2018-05-23 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Leonardo Boccuni; Lucio Marinelli; Carlo Trompetto; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; José María Tormos Muñoz Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2022-07-19 Impact factor: 4.086
Authors: Konstantin Warneke; Michael Keiner; Martin Hillebrecht; Stephan Schiemann Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-09-15 Impact factor: 4.614