| Literature DB >> 33175273 |
Sara Lebrazi1, Karsten Niehaus2, Hanna Bednarz2, Mouhcine Fadil3, Marwa Chraibi4, Kawtar Fikri-Benbrahim4.
Abstract
Entities:
Keywords: Acacia cyanophylla; Indole-3-acetic acid production; Optimization; PGPR; Phosphate solubilization
Year: 2020 PMID: 33175273 PMCID: PMC7658270 DOI: 10.1186/s43141-020-00090-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Genet Eng Biotechnol ISSN: 1687-157X
Geographic origin, geodesic coordinates, and climate type of the sampling sites
| Isolates | Geographic origin | Latitude N | Climate typea | Average temperature (°C)a | Average rainfall (mm)a |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fez | 34° 03′ 00′′ N 4° 58′ 59′′ W et 579 m | CSa (Mediterranean climate) | 18 | 536 | |
| Oujda | 34° 41′ 12′′ N 1° 54′ 41′′ W 450 m | BSk (Cold semi-arid climate) | 16.7 | 338 | |
| Tanger | 35° 46′ 02 ′′ N 5° 47′ 59′′ W 20 m | CSa (Mediterranean climate) | 17.9 | 762 | |
| Casablanca | 33° 35′ 17′′ N 7° 36′ 40′′ W 27 m | CSa (Mediterranean climate) | 17.7 | 412 |
aClimate type of each region according to Köppen climate classification system
Solubilization of tricalcium phosphate by the tested rhizobacterial strains
| Isolates | PVK medium | NBRIP medium | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solubilization efficiency (SE%) | Final pH | P2O5 liberated (μg ml-1) | Solubilization efficiency (SE%) | Final pH | P2O5 liberated (μg ml-1) | |
| 66 ± 1.41 | 5.95 ± 0.04 | 298 ± 9.89 | 66 ± 2.82 | 5.69 ± 0.02 | 488 ± 11.13 | |
| 96 ± 2.82 | 5.8 ± 0.03 | 410 ± 8.48 | 91 ± 2.12 | 5.2 ± 0.04 | 576 ± 8.48 | |
| 200 ± 4.94 | 5.28 ± 0.07 | 519 ± 9.19 | 190 ± 3.53 | 4.65 ± 0.07 | 782 ± 9.19 | |
| 183 ± 4.94 | 5.4 ± 0.02 | 480 ± 12.72 | 183 ± 2.12 | 4.85 ± 0.04 | 684 ± 5.65 | |
Correlation coefficient between final pH and P2O5 liberated (r = − 0.95 in PVK; r = − 0.98 in NBRIP); between solubilization efficiency and P2O5 liberated (r = 0.95) in both media
Effect of different carbon sources on the tricalcium phosphate solubilization by the tested rhizobacterial strains
| Carbon source (1%) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Final pH | P2O5 liberated (μg ml-1) | Final pH | P2O5 liberated (μg ml-1) | Final pH | P2O5 liberatd (μg ml-1) | Final pH | P2O5 liberated (μg ml-1) | |
| 5.69 ± 0.16 | 488 ± 8.48 | 5.22 ± 0.02 | 576 ± 5.65 | 4.65 ± 0.04 | 782 ± 9.19 | 4.85 ± 0.04 | 684 ± 6.36 | |
| 6.23 ± 0.03 | 240 ± 5.65 | 6.22 ± 0.05 | 256 ± 6.36 | 5.78 ± 0.04 | 320 ± 10.6 | 6.65 ± 0.08 | 365 ± 12.02 | |
| 6.60 ± 0.08 | 140 ± 10.6 | 6.76 ± 0.04 | 123 ± 9.19 | 6.18 ± 0.04 | 250 ± 7.07 | 6.22 ± 0.02 | 232 ± 5.65 | |
| 6.88 ± 0.22 | 92 ± 4.24 | 6.72 ± 0.66 | 124 ± 6.36 | 6.48 ± 0.09 | 174 ± 8.48 | 6.28 ± 0.04 | 256 ± 4.24 | |
| 6.55 ± 0.14 | 160 ± 4.24 | 6.86 ± 0.04 | 94 ± 5.65 | 6.91 ± 0.08 | 74 ± 9.89 | 6.88 ± 0.05 | 120 ± 10.60 | |
Effect of different nitrogen sources on the tricalcium phosphate solubilization by the tested rhizobacterial strains
| Nitrogen source (0.1%) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Final pH | P2O5 liberated (μg ml-1) | Final pH | P2O5 liberated (μg ml-1) | Final pH | P2O5 liberated (μg ml-1) | Final pH | P2O5 liberated (μg ml-1) | |
| 5.69 ± 0.02 | 488 ± 5.65 | 5.22 ± 0.05 | 576 ± 6.36 | 4.65 ± 0.04 | 782 ± 4.24 | 4.85 ± 0.04 | 684 ± 5.65 | |
| 5.82 ± 0.04 | 310 ± 2.82 | 6.21 ± 0.02 | 250 ± 6.36 | 5.72 ± 0.02 | 455 ± 9.19 | 5.75 ± 0.02 | 420 ± 9.19 | |
| 5.85 ± 0.04 | 302 ± 7.07 | 6.18 ± 0.04 | 253 ± 3.53 | 5.82 ± 0.04 | 320 ± 12.02 | 6.22 ± 0.04 | 235 ± 4.94 | |
| 5.74 ± 0.05 | 420 ± 11.31 | 4.95 ± 0.04 | 580 ± 10.6 | 4.72 ± 0.02 | 755 ± 5.65 | 4.92 ± 0.04 | 588 ± 11.31 | |
| 6.52 ± 0.04 | 185 ± 4.94 | 6.78 ± 0.05 | 92 ± 8.48 | 6.90 ± 0.07 | 68 ± 2.12 | 6.89 ± 0.21 | 96 ± 6.36 | |
| 6.75 ± 0.05 | 95 ± 7.07 | 6.88 ± 0.08 | 74 ± 7.07 | 6.95 ± 0.05 | 44 ± 4.94 | 6.86 ± 0.02 | 78 ± 4.94 | |
Fig. 1Effect of L-tryptophane concentrations on Rhizobium sp. growth and IAA production
Fig. 2Effect of incubation period on Rhizobium sp. growth and IAA production
Fig. 3Effect of different pH values on Rhizobium sp. growth and IAA production
Fig. 4Effect of NaCl concentrations on Rhizobium sp. growth and IAA production
Fig. 5Effect of inoculation with rhizobacterial strains on Acacia sp. growth
Sequence analysis of 16S rDNA for rhizobacterial strains associated with root nodule of Acacia cyanophylla
| Isolate | Accession (no) | Homology to the Identity reference strains | Identity (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| KJ648176.1 | 99 | ||
| MT584789.1 | 99 | ||
| AB921256.1 | 99 | ||
| MG637030.1 | 99 |