| Literature DB >> 33172458 |
Adesanya Olamide Adewale1, Okeniran Olatayo Segun2, Ibe Michael Usman2, Ann Lemuel Monima2, Eric Simidi Kegoye2, Keneth Iceland Kasozi3, Halima Nalugo4, Fred Ssempijja5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Understanding of suprascapular notch (SSN) anatomy and relationship with scapular dimensions are vital in diagnosis, prevention, and assessment of suprascapular nerve entrapment syndrome. The study aimed to assess morphometry of suprascapular notch and scapular dimensions in Ugandan dry scapulae with specific reference to scapulae with completely ossified superior transverse scapular ligaments.Entities:
Keywords: Anatomical variation; Completely ossified superior transverse scapular ligament; Scapular dimensions; Suprascapular nerve entrapment syndrome; Suprascapular notch; Ugandan population
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33172458 PMCID: PMC7656716 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-020-03769-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord ISSN: 1471-2474 Impact factor: 2.362
Fig. 3Photograph showing the osteometric measurements of a left scapula. Anterior view: a Major longitudinal axis of the scapular body; b Major transversal axis of the scapular body. Lateral view: c Major longitudinal axis of the glenoid fossa; d The major transversal axis of the glenoid fossa
Fig. 1Photographs of the scapulae representing the suprascapular notch types of the study
Fig. 2Percentage distribution of the suprascapular notch types
Comparison of the percentages of the different types of suprascapular notch presented in the literature
| Author | Type I | Type II | Type III | Type IV | Type V | Type VI | Population (N) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8% | 31% | 48% | 3% | 6% | 4% | American (211) | |
| 8.3% | 42% | 42% | 7% | 0.7% | 0% | Greek (423) | |
| 22% | 21% | 29% | 6% | 19% | 3% | Kenyan (138) | |
| 7% | Polish (86) | ||||||
| 21.4% | 19.8% | 22.8% | 31.1% | 10.2% | 3.6% | Italian (500) | |
| 24.2% | 1.9% | 56.2% | 4.7 | 4.7% | 0% | Polish (308) | |
| 20% | 10% | 52% | 4% | 4% | 10% | Indian (415) | |
| 16.3% | 12.2% | 51% | 12.2% | 4.1% | 8.2% | Ugandan (50) |
N Number of the sample
Descriptive analysis of the morphometric dimensions of scapulae of suprascapular notch types
| SSN Type | Mean (cm) | Median (cm) | Standard | Range (cm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 15.14 | 15.50 | 1.004 | 13.50–16.00 |
| B | 10.39 | 11.00 | 1.233 | 8.300–11.30 |
| C | 3.613 | 3.650 | 0.3758 | 3.000–4.000 |
| D | 2.425 | 2.550 | 0.2659 | 2.000–2.600 |
| A | 11.90 | 11.90 | 0.2098 | 11.60–12.20 |
| B | 8.817 | 8.900 | 1.233 | 8.300–9.000 |
| C | 3.433 | 3.400 | 0.1366 | 3.300–3.600 |
| D | 2.283 | 2.250 | 0.09832 | 2.200–2.400 |
| A | 14.37 | 14.50 | 0.9320 | 13.20–15.40 |
| B | 9.970 | 10.30 | 0.6996 | 9.000–10.60 |
| C | 3.448 | 3.500 | 0.2213 | 3.100–3.700 |
| D | 2.735 | 2.600 | 0.5449 | 2.200–3.500 |
| A | 15.55 | 15.90 | 0.6442 | 14.50–16.00 |
| B | 10.78 | 11.00 | 0.7885 | 9.500–11.50 |
| C | 3.817 | 3.900 | 0.2137 | 3.500–4.000 |
| D | 2.950 | 2.800 | 0.5282 | 2.400–3.600 |
| A | 15.50 | 15.50 | 0.7071 | 15.00–16.00 |
| B | 10.45 | 10.45 | 0.4950 | 10.10–10.80 |
| C | 3.650 | 3.650 | 0.2121 | 3.500–3.800 |
| D | 2.650 | 2.650 | 0.2121 | 2.500–2.800 |
| A | 13.45 | 13.20 | 2.402 | 11.40–16.00 |
| B | 10.10 | 9.850 | 1.667 | 8.700–12.00 |
| C | 3.325 | 3.300 | 0.1258 | 3.200–3.500 |
| D | 2.275 | 2.250 | 0.09574 | 2.200–2.400 |
A = the major longitudinal axis of the scapular body; B = the major transversal axis of the scapular body; C = the major longitudinal axis of the glenoid fossa; D = the major transversal axis of the glenoid fossa. SSN Ssuprascapular notch
Fig. 4Bar graphs showing the morphometric dimensions of the scapula. a The major longitudinal axis of the scapular body; b The major transversal axis of the scapular body; c The major longitudinal axis of the glenoid fossa; d The major transversal axis of the glenoid fossa. Each value is expressed as mean ± S.D. S. D = Standard deviation. a, b, and c represent relationships at p < 0.05
Correlation coefficient for suprascapular notch and scapular morphometric measurements
| A | B | C | D | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ||||
| 0.920547 | 1 | |||
| 0.576491 | 0.674716 | 1 | ||
| 0.430148 | 0.513304 | 0.690425 | 1 |
A = the major longitudinal axis of the scapular body; B = the major transversal axis of the scapular body; C = the major longitudinal axis of the glenoid fossa; D = the major transversal axis of the glenoid fossa
Correlation coefficient of each SSN type of different morphometric dimensions
| A | B | C | D | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 1 | |||
| B | 0.988912 | 1 | ||
| C | 0.850258 | 0.841722 | 1 | |
| D | 0.980342 | 0.98981 | 0.768303 | 1 |
| A | 1 | |||
| B | 0.597196 | 1 | ||
| C | 0.279145 | 0.143823 | 1 | |
| D | −0.29093 | 0.537122 | 0.049629 | 1 |
| A | 1 | |||
| B | 0.972381 | 1 | ||
| C | 0.692801 | 0.828927 | 1 | |
| VD | 0.401379 | 0.599059 | 0.927954 | 1 |
| A | 1 | |||
| B | 0.970608 | 1 | ||
| C | 0.980641 | 0.98719 | 1 | |
| D | 0.767034 | 0.881222 | 0.85935 | 1 |
| A | 1 | |||
| B | no value | 1 | ||
| C | no value | no value | 1 | |
| D | no value | no value | no value | 1 |
| A | 1 | |||
| B | 0.997069 | 1 | ||
| C | −0.22608 | −0.22243 | 1 | |
| D | −0.89137 | −0.877 | −0.20751 | 1 |
no value = #DIV/0! error value because the standard deviation of the values equals zero in Type V suprascapular notch. A = the major longitudinal axis of the scapular body; B = the major transversal axis of the scapular body; C = the major longitudinal axis of the glenoid fossa; D = the major transversal axis of the glenoid fossa. SSN Suprascapular notch
Correlation coefficient of each morphometric dimension for scapulae of different suprascapular notch types
| Type 1 | Type 2 | Type 3 | Type 4 | Type 5 | Type 6 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type 1 | 1 | |||||
| Type 2 | −0.20484 | 1 | ||||
| Type 3 | −0.08035 | −0.25059 | 1 | |||
| Type 4 | −0.18342 | 0.192408 | 0.294996 | 1 | ||
| Type 5 | no value | no value | no value | no value | 1 | |
| Type 6 | −0.76664 | −0.33322 | 0.984199 | −0.05088 | no value | 1 |
| Type 1 | 1 | |||||
| Type 2 | 0.051943 | 1 | ||||
| Type 3 | −0.03034 | −0.4133 | 1 | |||
| Type 4 | −0.09387 | 0.758566 | 0.035569 | 1 | ||
| Type 5 | no value | no value | no value | no value | 1 | |
| Type 6 | −0.78853 | −0.61113 | 0.994792 | −0.21097 | no value | 1 |
| Type 1 | 1 | |||||
| Type 2 | −0.41302 | 1 | ||||
| Type 3 | 0.455726 | 0.368522 | 1 | |||
| Type 4 | −0.04801 | 0.593675 | −0.15245 | 1 | ||
| Type 5 | no value | no value | no value | no value | 1 | |
| Type 6 | 0.319764 | 0.187317 | −0.2163 | 0.723339 | no value | 1 |
| Type 1 | 1 | |||||
| Type 2 | −0.116 | 1 | ||||
| Type 3 | 0.252832 | −0.5579 | 1 | |||
| Type 4 | 0.129556 | 0.94353 | −0.45142 | 1 | ||
| Type 5 | no value | no value | no value | no value | 1 | |
| Type 6 | 0.636364 | −0.09091 | −0.72408 | 0.080013 | no value | 1 |
no value = #DIV/0! error value because the standard deviation of the values equals zero in Type V suprascapular notch. A = the major longitudinal axis of the scapular body; B = the major transversal axis of the scapular body; C = the major longitudinal axis of the glenoid fossa; D = the major transversal axis of the glenoid fossa