| Literature DB >> 34335868 |
George Tsikouris1, Ioannis Antonopoulos1, Dionysia Vasdeki1, Dimosthenis Chrysikos1, Athanasios Koukakis1, George Tsakotos1, Panagiotis Georgakopoulos1, Theodore Troupis1.
Abstract
Background The suprascapular notch (SN) represents the point along the route of the suprascapular nerve (SSN) with the greatest potential risk for injury and compression. Thus, factors reducing the area of the notch have been postulated for suprascapular neuropathy development. Methods Thirty-one fresh-frozen shoulders were dissected. The contents of the SN were described according to four types as classified by Polguj et al and the middle-transverse diameter of the notch was measured. Also, the presence of an ossified superior transverse scapular ligament (STSL) was identified. Results The ligament was partially ossified in 8 specimens (25.8%), fully ossified in 6 (19.35%), and not ossified in the remaining 17 (54.85%). The mean middle-transverse diameter of the SN was 9.06 mm (standard deviation [SD] = 3.45). The corresponding for type-I notches was 8.64 mm (SD = 3.34), 8.86 mm (SD = 3.12) was for type-II, and 14.5 mm (SD = 1.02) was for type III. Middle-transverse diameter was shorter when an ossified ligament was present (mean = 5.10 mm, SD = 0.88 mm), comparing with a partially ossified ligament (mean =7.67 mm, SD = 2.24 mm) and a nonossified one (mean = 11.12 mm, SD = 2.92 mm). No statistically significant evidence was found that the middle-transverse diameter depends on the number of the elements, passing below the STSL. Conclusion Our results suggest that SSN compression could be more likely to occur when both suprascapular vessels pass through the notch. Compression of the nerve may also occur when an ossified transverse scapular ligament is present, resulting to significant reduction of the notch's area. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ).Entities:
Keywords: cadavers; fresh frozen; morphometry; neuropathy; shoulder surgery; suprascapular nerve; suprascapular notch
Year: 2021 PMID: 34335868 PMCID: PMC8315989 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1731749
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Brachial Plex Peripher Nerve Inj ISSN: 1749-7221
Fig. 1Illustration of the scapula's upper part, showing the distance measured as the SN's middle-transverse diameter (red double arrow). SN, suprascapular notch; STSL, superior transverse scapular ligament.
Fig. 2Type-I content of the SN according to the classification used (normal anatomy). SN, suprascapular notch; SSN, suprascapular nerve; SSV, suprascapular vein; STSL, superior transverse scapular ligament.
Fig. 3Type-II content of the SN according to the classification used (only the nerve through the notch). SN, suprascapular notch; SSN, suprascapular nerve; SSV, suprascapular vein; STSL, superior transverse scapular ligament.
Fig. 4Type-III content of the SN according to the classification used (nerve and both vessels through the notch). SSA, suprascapular artery; SN, suprascapular notch; SSN, suprascapular nerve; SSV, suprascapular vein; STSL, superior transverse scapular ligament.
Middle-transverse diameters categorized by SN's content type (classification by Polguj et al)
| Scapulae |
| Mean (mm) | SD (mm) | Min (mm) | Max (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type I | 22 (70.97) | 8.64 | 3.36 | 4.02 | 14.97 |
| Type II | 7 (22.58) | 8.86 | 3.12 | 5.82 | 13.94 |
| Type III | 2 (6.45) | 14.05 | 1.02 | 13.78 | 15.22 |
| Total | 31 (100) | 9.06 | 3.45 | 4.02 | 15.22 |
Abbreviations: Max, maximum; Min, minimum; SN, suprascapular notch; SD, standard deviation.
Fig. 5Variance of SN middle-transverse diameter depending on SN content type according to Polguj's classification.
Results of pairwise comparison of notch transverse diameters regarding STSL ossification status
| STSL type | Contrast | SE | Turkey |
| 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full ossification vs. nonossification | −5.78 | 1.16 | −4.96 | 0.0001 | −8.67 | −2.89 |
| Partially ossification vs. nonossification | −3.21 | 1.05 | −3.05 | 0.014 | −5.82 | −0.6 |
| Partial vs. full ossification | 2.57 | 1.31 | 1.95 | 0.143 | −0.7 | 5.83 |
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; SE, standard error; STSL, superior transverse scapular ligament.