| Literature DB >> 35865849 |
Thom Kaledzera1,2, Brian Matundu1, Gbenga Anthony Adefolaju3, Juziel Manda1, Anthony Mwakikunga1.
Abstract
Introduction: the anatomy of the suprascapular notch and its relationship to scapular dimensions are critical in the management of suprascapular neuropathies. Individuals show considerable differences in the dimensions of the suprascapular notch across populations. The purpose of this study was to determine the morphology and morphometric dimensions of the suprascapular notch in adult Malawian cadavers and to suggest clinical implications associated with complete ossification of the suprascapular ligament.Entities:
Keywords: Morphology; morphometry; scapula; suprascapular neuropathy; suprascapular notch
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35865849 PMCID: PMC9269040 DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2022.41.324.33205
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pan Afr Med J
Figure 1photographs showing the various morphological classification of the suprascapular notch: A) absent; B) type I; C) type II; D) type III; E) type IV; F) type V; G) type VI
Figure 2morphometric measurements of the suprascapular notch to assess: A) the superior transverse distance; B) mid transverse distance; C) maximum depth
Figure 3anthropometric measurements of the scapula; measurements of the maximum length and maximum width of the scapula
morphological classification of suprascapular notch with frequencies and percentages
| Classification of the notch | Total | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Absent | Type 1 | Type 2 | Type 3 | Type 4 | Type 5 | Type 6 | ||
| Frequency | 6 | 46 | 21 | 37 | 5 | 9 | 1 | 125 |
| Percentage | 4.8 | 36.8 | 16.8 | 29.6 | 4.0 | 7.2 | 0.8 | 100 |
Figure 4unusual morphology of the suprascapular notch; not fitting in either type of the rengachary classification system
a summary of descriptive analyses and comparison of means of the suprascapular notch superior transverse distance, mid transverse distance, maximum depth, maximum length and maximum width between suprascapular notch morphological classes
| Variable | Superior transverse distance (cm) | Mid transverse distance (cm) | Maximum depth (cm) | Maximum length (cm) | Maximum width (cm) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| II | III | IV | II | III | IV | II | III | IV | II | III | IV | II | III | IV | |
| Mean | 1.313 | 1.433 | 0.650 | 1.013 | 1.172 | 0.400 | 0.375 | 0.772 | 0.350 | 14.550 | 14.328 | 15.350 | 10.313 | 10.183 | 10.000 |
| Standard deviation | 0.4728 | 0.0707 | 0.7680 | 0.3409 | 0.1414 | 0.2605 | 0.2445 | 0.0707 | 0.7946 | 1.1726 | 1.2021 | 0.5592 | 0.8913 | 0.0000 | |
| Standard error | 0.2689 | 0.1114 | 0.0500 | 0.2715 | 0.0804 | 0.1000 | 0.0921 | 0.0576 | 0.0500 | 0.2809 | 0.2764 | 0.8500 | 0.1977 | 0.2101 | 0.0000 |
| P-value | 0.980 | 0.840 | 0.001* | 0.444 | 0.864 | ||||||||||
| Remark | NS | NS | S | NS | NS | ||||||||||
n= 125; S= Significant difference; NS= No significant difference