| Literature DB >> 33168856 |
E Maziotis1,2, K Sfakianoudis3, P Giannelou1,3, S Grigoriadis1, A Rapani1, P Tsioulou1, K Nikolettos4, A Pantou3, A Tiptiri-Kourpeti4, M Koutsilieris1, B Asimakopoulos2, N Nikolettos2,4, K Pantos3, Mara Simopoulou5,6.
Abstract
A number of oocyte characteristics have been associated with fertilization, implantation and live-birth rates, albeit without reaching a consensus. This study aims to delineate possible associations between oocyte characteristics, oocyte behavior during intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), fertilization potential, and laboratory outcomes. Four-hundred and seventy-seven patients, yielding 3452 oocytes, were enrolled in this prospective observational study from 2015 to 2018. Οoplasm granularity was associated with poor embryo quality and higher probabilities of post-ICSI oocytes and embryos discarded in any developmental stage and never selected for embryo transfer or cryopreservation (p < 0.001). Both sudden or difficult ooplasm aspiration, and high or lack of resistance during ICSI were associated with either a poor Zygote-Score or fertilization failure (p < 0.001). Sudden or difficult ooplasm aspiration and high resistance during ICSI penetration were positively associated with resulting to a post-ICSI oocyte or embryo that would be selected for discard. Evaluation of oocyte characteristics and oocyte behavior during ICSI may provide early information regarding laboratory and cycle outcomes. Particularly, ooplasm granularity, and fragmentation of polar body, along with sudden or difficult ooplasm aspiration and high or lack of resistance during ICSI penetration may hinder the outcome of an ICSI cycle. The associations presented herein may contribute towards development of a grading system or a prediction model. Taking into account information on oocytes and ICSI behavior may effectively assist in enhancing IVF outcome rates.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33168856 PMCID: PMC7653966 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-75164-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Patient characteristics and embryological data.
| Total cohort | |
|---|---|
| Female age | 36.45 ± 1.45 |
| FSH (mIU/mL) | 7.29 ± 1.02 |
| LH (mIU/mL) | 4.55 ± 0.83 |
| E2 (pg/mL) | 2110.99 ± 277.15 |
| AMH (ng/mL) | 3.67 ± 0.80 |
| Progesterone (ng/mL) | 12.66 ± 3.28 |
| Oocytes retrieved | 3452 |
| MII | 3055 (88.50%)a |
| MI | 129 (3.74%)a |
| GV | 246 (7.13%)a |
| Abnormal | 22 (0.64%)a |
| 2PN | 2678 (87.66%)b |
| 1PN | 83 (2.72%)b |
| 3PN | 86 (2.28%)b |
| Unfertilized | 181 (5.92%)b |
| Degenerated oocytes post-ICSI | 87 (2.85%) |
| Uncleaved | 199 (7.43%)c |
| Arrested | 35 (1.31%)c |
| Day 3 Grade 1 | 355 (13.26%)c |
| Day 3 Grade 2 | 735 (27.45%)c |
| Day 3 Grade 3 | 454 (16.95%)c |
| Day 3 Grade 4 | 351 (13.11%)c |
| Day 3 Grade 5 | 549 (20.50%)c |
aDivided by the total number of oocytes.
bDivided by the total number of MII oocytes.
cDivided by the total number of 2PN zygotes.
Grading of embryos transferred.
| Day 3 quality | Number of embryos transferred (n = 954) |
|---|---|
| Grade 1 | 129 (13.52%) |
| Grade 2 | 572 (59.96%) |
| Grade 3 | 177 (18.55%) |
| Grade 4 | 76 (7.97%) |
| Grade 5 | 0 (0%) |
Figure 1Workflow chart regarding patient and oocyte characteristics.
Figure 2All-inclusive associations between oocyte characteristics, behavior during ICSI, fertilization, Z-Score, embryo grading and post-ICSI oocytes and embryos selected to be discarded.
Odds ratio (and 95% CI) of associations between oocyte characteristics and Z-Score.
| Unfertilized | Z3 | Z4 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dark ooplasm | 11.213 (3.02–41.62) | 9.57 (2.96–30.89) | 15.72 (4.28–57.68) |
| Granular ooplasm | NS | 9.27 (4.92–17.48) | 4.99 (2.40–10.35) |
| Vacuolated ooplasm | NS | NS | 22.69 (5.61–91.70) |
| Lack of ooplasm translucency | 9.77 (4.33–22.04) | NS | NS |
| Thick ZP | 13.13 (4.94–38.38) | NS | NS |
Odds ratio (and 95% CI) of associations between oocyte characteristics and oocyte behavior during ICSI.
| High resistance | No resistance | Sudden ooplasm aspiration | Difficult ooplasm aspiration | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Large oocyte size | NS | 10.40 (3.27–33.10) | NS | NS |
| Dark ooplasm | NS | NS | 14.75 (7.72–29.89) | 16.03 (7.45–34.48) |
| Granular ooplasm | NS | NS | 4.21 (2.68–6.59) | 8.57 (5.50–13.34) |
| Vacuolated ooplasm | NS | 7.59 (3.12–18.43) | 16.34 (7.52–35.48) | 12.24 (5.11–29.19) |
| Lack of ooplasm translucency | 3.13 (1.77–5.33) | NS | NS | NS |
| Granular PVS | 10.53 (6.27–26.60) | NS | NS | 3.40 (2.07–5.57) |
| Large PVS | NS | NS | 29.85 (7.57–117.637) | 16.07 (3.39–76.05) |
| Thick ZP | 13.39 (6.81–29.02) | NS | 3.62 (1.85–7.07) | NS |
| Thin ZP | NS | 111.13 (10.84–1139.12) | 12.48 (3.53–44.12) | NS |
| Uneven ZP | NS | 331.25 (30.89–3551.65) | NS | NS |
| Dark ZP | 83.48 (30.68–227.09) | 23.51 (7.73–71.48) | NS | NS |
| Granular ZP | 10.27 (4.81–21.91) | 12.10 (3.63–40.31) | NS | NS |
| Large PB | NS | NS | NS | 53.18 (5.86–481.97) |
| Granular PB | NS | 33.33(9.36–118.71) | NS | NS |
NS not significant.
Figure 3Associations between polar body, perivitelline space characteristics, oocyte size, behaviour during ICSI, fertilization, Z-Score, embryo grading and post-ICSI oocytes and embryos selected to be discarded.
Figure 4Associations between Zona Pellucida characteristics, behaviour during ICSI, fertilization, Z-Score, embryo grading and post-ICSI oocytes and embryos selected to be discarded.
Figure 5Associations between ooplasm characteristics behaviour during ICSI, fertilization, Z-Score, embryo grading and post-ICSI oocytes and embryos selected to be discarded.