| Literature DB >> 33167555 |
Mariusz G Fleszar1, Paulina Fortuna1, Marek Zawadzki2,3, Bogna Kosyk4, Małgorzata Krzystek-Korpacka1.
Abstract
Quantification with satisfactory specificity and sensitivity of free 3-Nitro-l-tyrosine (3-NT), 3-Chloro-l-tyrosine (3-CT), and 3-Bromo-l-tyrosine (3-BT) in biological samples as potential inflammation, oxidative stress, and cancer biomarkers is analytically challenging. We aimed at developing a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)-based method for their simultaneous analysis without an extract purification step by solid-phase extraction. Validation of the developed method yielded the following limits of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) for 3-NT, 3-BT, and 3-CT: 0.030, 0.026, 0.030 ng/mL (LODs) and 0.100, 0.096, 0.098 ng/mL (LOQs). Coefficients of variation for all metabolites and tested concentrations were <10% and accuracy was within 95-105%. Method applicability was tested on colorectal cancer patients during the perioperative period. All metabolites were significantly higher in cancer patients than healthy controls. The 3-NT was significantly lower in advanced cancer and 3-BT showed a similar tendency. Dynamics of 3-BT in the early postoperative period were affected by type of surgery and presence of surgical site infections. In conclusion, a sensitive and specific LC-MS/MS method for simultaneous quantification of free 3-NT, 3-BT, and 3-CT in human plasma has been developed.Entities:
Keywords: biomarkers; inflammation; liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry; metabolomics; minimal invasive surgery; nitrosative stress; oxidative stress
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33167555 PMCID: PMC7663926 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25215158
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Results of method validation.
| Compound | Sensitivity | Linearity | Precision and Accuracy | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Within-Run ( | Between-Run ( | ||||||||||
| LOD (ng/mL) | LQQ (ng/mL) | R2 | Slope tcal > tcri | Expected Conc. (ng/mL) | Measured Conc. (ng/mL) | Precision (CV%) | Accuracy (%) | Measured conc. (ng/mL) | Precision (CV%) | Accuracy (%) | |
| 3-NT | 0.030 | 0.100 | 0.997 | 168.18 > 1.94 | 0.275 | 0.261 ± 0.006 | 9.04 | 94.9 | 0.264 ± 0.005 | 7.26 | 96.0 |
| 3-CT | 0.026 | 0.096 | 0.996 | 175.39 > 1.94 | 0.275 | 0.279 ± 0.002 | 2.49 | 101.5 | 0.279 ± 0.002 | 2.51 | 101.5 |
| 3-BT | 0.030 | 0.098 | 0.996 | 170.82 > 1.94 | 0.268 | 0.239 ± 0.001 | 1.52 | 97.5 | 0.270 ± 0.002 | 2.10 | 98.3 |
3-NT, 3-Nitro-l-tyrosine; 3-CT, 3-Chloro-l-tyrosine; 3-BT, 3-Bromo-l-tyrosine; LOD, limit of detection; LOQ, limit of quantification; CV, coefficient of variation; R2, regression coefficient; conc., concentration.
Mean recovery rates.
| Compound | Plasma | Response of Working Standard Solution Diluted in Water | Added Concentration (ng/mL) | Spiked Plasma | Recovery (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-NT | 0.53 ± 0.08 | 0.097 | 0.30 | 0.87 ± 0.10 | 109.43 |
| 3-CT | 1.09 ± 0.21 | 0.185 | 0.40 | 1.51 ± 0.31 | 106.03 |
| 3-BT | 0.43 ± 0.08 | 0.362 | 0.36 | 0.79 ± 0.04 | 100.22 |
3-NT, 3-Nitro-l-tyrosine; 3-CT, 3-Chloro-l-tyrosine; 3-BT, 3-Bromo-l-tyrosine; SD, standard deviation.
Figure 1Calibration curve for the LC-MS/MS analysis of (a) 3-Nitro-l-tyrosine (3-NT); (b) 3-Chloro-l-tyrosine (3-CT); (c) 3-Bromo-l-tyrosine (3-BT).
Figure 2Ion chromatograms of 3-CT, 3-CT-13C6 (3-Chloro-l-tyrosine (RING-13C6)), 3-NT, 3-NT-13C6 (3-Nitro-l-tyrosine (RING-13C6)), 3-BT, and 3-BT-13C6 (3-Bromo-l-tyrosine (RING-13C6)).
Plasma concentrations of modified tyrosine in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and healthy controls.
| Parameter | Controls | CRC Patients | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 43 | 75 | - |
| Age, median (95% | 65 (63–68) | 66 (65–70) | 0.120 1 |
| Sex (F/M), | 22/21 | 30/45 | 0.254 2 |
| 3-NT (ng/mL), mean (95%CI) | 0.45 (0.32–0.58) | 3.47 (1.51–5.42) | 0.003 3 |
| 3-CT (ng/mL), mean (95%CI) | 0.52 (0.13–0.90) | 1.20 (0.65–1.76) | 0.044 3 |
| 3-BT (ng/mL), mean (95%CI) | 0.63 (0.46–0.81) | 3.12 (1.42–4.82) | 0.005 3 |
N, number of cases; CI, confidence interval; F/M, female-to-male ratio; 3-NT, 3-Nitro-l-tyrosine; 3-CT, 3-Chloro-l-tyrosine; 3-BT, 3-Bromo-l-tyrosine; 1 Mann–Whitney U test; 2 Fisher exact test; 3 t-test for independent samples with Welch correction.
Figure 3Individual metabolite concentrations in study population: (a) 3-Nitro-l-tyrosine (3-NT); (b) 3-Chloro-l-tyrosine (3-CT); (c) 3-Bromo-l-tyrosine (3-BT). Red triangles with whiskers represent mean with 95% confidence interval. CRC, colorectal cancer.
Figure 4Plasma concentrations of oxidatively modified tyrosine in colorectal cancer patients during early postoperative period: (a) 3-Nitro-l-tyrosine (3-NT); (b) 3-Chloro-l-tyrosine (3-CT); (c) 3-Bromo-l-tyrosine (3-BT).
Figure 5Impact of surgery-related factors on a time course of 3-Nitro-l-tyrosine (3-NT): (a) type of surgery; (b) surgical site infections (SSI); (c) the Clavien–Dindo (CD) classification of surgical complications.
Figure 6Impact of surgery-related factors on a time course of 3-Chloro-l-tyrosine (3-CT): (a) type of surgery; (b) surgical site infections (SSI); (c) the Clavien–Dindo (CD) classification of surgical complications.
Figure 7Impact of surgery-related factors on a time course of 3-Bromo-l-tyrosine (3-BT): (a) type of surgery; (b) surgical site infections (SSI); (c) the Clavien–Dindo (CD) classification of surgical complications. *, significantly different from concentrations at other time points.
Characteristics of study population.
| Parameter | Analysis at Baseline | Follow-Up Analysis |
|---|---|---|
|
| 75 | 58 |
| Sex (F/M), | 30/45 | 21/37 |
| Age (yrs.), mean (95% | 65.3 (62.4–68.3) | 66.9 (63.8–69.9) |
| BMI, median (95% | 26.0 (25–27.6) | 25.8 (24.8–27.7) |
| ASAPS, 1/2/3 ( | 17/47/11 | 11/38/9 |
| CCS, median (95% | 5 (4–5) | 5 (4–5) |
| TNM, 0/I/II/III/IV ( | 5/6/28/29/5 | 4/4/24/21/5 |
| T, Tis/1/2/3/4 ( | 5/1/9/47/13 | 4/1/6/35/12 |
| N, 0/1/2 ( | 39/20/16 | 32/13/13 |
| M, 0/1 ( | 70/5 | 53/5 |
| G, 1/2/3/4/x ( | 9/49/10/1/6 | 8/37/9/1/3 |
| Anatomical site, RC/LC/R ( | 21/21/33 | 19/25/14 |
| Surgery type, open/robotic ( | - | 33/25 |
| Procedure, APR/LH/LAR/RH/SR ( | - | 2/4/23/14/15 |
| Surgery length (min.), mean (95% | - | 174 (156–193) |
| Surgical site infections, yes/no ( | - | 45/13 |
| Complications, CD < 3/CD ≥ 3 ( | - | 54/4 |
| LoHS (days), median (range) | - | 6 (3–20) |
N, number of observations; F, females; M, males; yrs. years; CI, confidence interval; BMI, body mass index; ASAPS, the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System; CCS, the Charlson Comorbidity Score; TNM, tumor-node-metastasis staging system; G, histopathological grade; RC, right colon; LC, left colon; R, rectum; APR, abdominal perineal resection; LH, left hemicolectomy; LAR, low anterior resection; RH, right hemicolectomy; SR, sigmoid resection; EBL, estimated blood loss; LN, lymph nodes; CDC, the Clavien–Dindo classification of postoperative complications; LoHS, length of hospital stay.