Marek Zawadzki1, Malgorzata Krzystek-Korpacka2, Andrzej Gamian3,4, Wojciech Witkiewicz5. 1. Department of Surgical Oncology, Regional Specialist Hospital, Research and Development Centre at Regional Specialist Hospital, ul. Kamienskiego 73a, 51-124, Wroclaw, Poland. zawadzkimd@gmail.com. 2. Department of Medical Biochemistry, Wroclaw Medical University, ul. Chalubinskiego 10, 50-368, Wroclaw, Poland. malgorzata.krzystek-korpacka@umed.wroc.pl. 3. Department of Medical Biochemistry, Wroclaw Medical University, ul. Chalubinskiego 10, 50-368, Wroclaw, Poland. 4. Laboratory of Medical Microbiology, Ludwik Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, Polish Academy of Sciences, Wroclaw, Poland. 5. Department of Surgical Oncology, Regional Specialist Hospital, Research and Development Centre at Regional Specialist Hospital, ul. Kamienskiego 73a, 51-124, Wroclaw, Poland.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Robotic colorectal surgery continues to rise in popularity, but there remains little evidence on the stress response following the procedure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the inflammatory response to robotic colorectal surgery and compare it with the response generated by open colorectal surgery. METHODS: This was a prospective nonrandomized comparative study involving 61 patients with colorectal cancer. The evaluation of inflammatory response to either robotic or open colorectal surgery was expressed as changes in interleukin-1β, interleukin-1 receptor antagonist, interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-α, C-reactive protein, and procalcitonin during the first three postoperative days. RESULTS: Of the 61 patients, 33 underwent robotic colorectal surgery while 28 had open colorectal surgery. Groups were comparable with respect to age, sex, BMI, cancer stage, and type of resection. The relative increase of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist at 8 h postoperative, compared to baseline, was higher in the open group (P = 0.006). The decrease of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist on postoperative days 1 and 3, compared to the maximum at 8 h, was more pronounced in the open group than in the robotic group (P = 0.008, P = 0.006, respectively), and the relative increase of interleukin-6 at 8 h after incision was higher in the open group (P = 0.007). The relative increase of procalcitonin on postoperative days 1 and 3 was higher in the open group than the robotic group (P < 0.001, P = 0.004, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that when compared with open colorectal surgery, robotic colorectal surgery results in a less pronounced inflammatory response and more pronounced anti-inflammatory action.
PURPOSE:Robotic colorectal surgery continues to rise in popularity, but there remains little evidence on the stress response following the procedure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the inflammatory response to robotic colorectal surgery and compare it with the response generated by open colorectal surgery. METHODS: This was a prospective nonrandomized comparative study involving 61 patients with colorectal cancer. The evaluation of inflammatory response to either robotic or open colorectal surgery was expressed as changes in interleukin-1β, interleukin-1 receptor antagonist, interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-α, C-reactive protein, and procalcitonin during the first three postoperative days. RESULTS: Of the 61 patients, 33 underwent robotic colorectal surgery while 28 had open colorectal surgery. Groups were comparable with respect to age, sex, BMI, cancer stage, and type of resection. The relative increase of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist at 8 h postoperative, compared to baseline, was higher in the open group (P = 0.006). The decrease of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist on postoperative days 1 and 3, compared to the maximum at 8 h, was more pronounced in the open group than in the robotic group (P = 0.008, P = 0.006, respectively), and the relative increase of interleukin-6 at 8 h after incision was higher in the open group (P = 0.007). The relative increase of procalcitonin on postoperative days 1 and 3 was higher in the open group than the robotic group (P < 0.001, P = 0.004, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that when compared with open colorectal surgery, robotic colorectal surgery results in a less pronounced inflammatory response and more pronounced anti-inflammatory action.
Authors: Pierre J Guillou; Philip Quirke; Helen Thorpe; Joanne Walker; David G Jayne; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown Journal: Lancet Date: 2005 May 14-20 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: J G Stage; S Schulze; P Møller; H Overgaard; M Andersen; V B Rebsdorf-Pedersen; H J Nielsen Journal: Br J Surg Date: 1997-03 Impact factor: 6.939
Authors: J Shibata; S Ishihara; N Tada; K Kawai; N H Tsuno; H Yamaguchi; E Sunami; J Kitayama; T Watanabe Journal: Tech Coloproctol Date: 2015-03-12 Impact factor: 3.781
Authors: Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-05-13 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Mariusz G Fleszar; Paulina Fortuna; Marek Zawadzki; Paweł Hodurek; Iwona Bednarz-Misa; Wojciech Witkiewicz; Małgorzata Krzystek-Korpacka Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2021-02-04 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Pedja Cuk; Randi Maria Simonsen; Mirjana Komljen; Michael Festersen Nielsen; Per Helligsø; Andreas Kristian Pedersen; Christian Backer Mogensen; Mark Bremholm Ellebæk Journal: World J Surg Oncol Date: 2021-05-22 Impact factor: 2.754
Authors: Corina Behrenbruch; Carolyn Shembrey; Sophie Paquet-Fifield; Christina Mølck; Hyun-Jung Cho; Michael Michael; Benjamin N J Thomson; Alexander G Heriot; Frédéric Hollande Journal: Clin Exp Metastasis Date: 2018-01-15 Impact factor: 4.510