Literature DB >> 33164999

Dynamics of Blood Flows in Aortic Stenosis: Mild, Moderate, and Severe.

Choon-Sik Jhun1, Raymond Newswanger1, Joshua P Cysyk1, Sailahari Ponnaluri2, Bryan Good2, Keefe B Manning2, Gerson Rosenberg1,2.   

Abstract

Supraphysiologic high shear stresses created in calcific aortic stenosis (AS) are known to cause hemostatic abnormalities, however, the relationship between the complex blood flows over the severity of AS and hemostatic abnormalities still remains unclear. This study systematically characterized the blood flow in mild, moderate, and severe AS. A series of large eddy simulations (LES) validated by particle image velocimetry were performed on physiologically representative AS models with a peak physiologic flow condition of 18 liter per minute. Time-accurate velocity fields, transvalvular pressure gradient, and laminar viscous-and turbulent (or Reynolds) shear stresses (RSSmax) were evaluated for each degree of severity. The peak velocities of mild, moderate, and severe AS were on the order of 2.0, 4.0, and 8.0 m/s, respectively. Jet velocity in severe AS was highly skewed with extremely high velocity (as high as 8 m/s) and mainly traveled through the posterior aortic wall up to the aortic arch while still carrying a relatively high velocity, that is, >4 m/s. The mean laminar viscous wall shear stresses (WSS) for mild, moderate, and severe AS were on the order of 40, 100, and 180 Pa, respectively. The RSSmax were on the order of 260, 490, and 2,500 Pa for mild, moderate, and severe AS, respectively. This study may provide a link between altered flows in AS and hemostatic abnormalities such as acquired von Willebrand syndrome and hemolysis, thus, help diagnosing and timing of the treatment.
Copyright © ASAIO 2020.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33164999      PMCID: PMC8093327          DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001296

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ASAIO J        ISSN: 1058-2916            Impact factor:   3.826


  55 in total

1.  Acquired type 2A von Willebrand syndrome caused by aortic valve disease corrects during valve surgery.

Authors:  C Solomon; U Budde; S Schneppenheim; E Czaja; C Hagl; H Schoechl; M von Depka; N Rahe-Meyer
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  Acquired von Willebrand syndrome in children with patent ductus arteriosus.

Authors:  R Rauch; U Budde; A Koch; M Girisch; M Hofbeck
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Evaluation of Intravascular Hemolysis With Erythrocyte Creatine in Patients With Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Tetsuro Sugiura; Toshika Okumiya; Toru Kubo; Hiroaki Takeuchi; Yoshihisa Matsumura
Journal:  Int Heart J       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  The fluid mechanics of aortic stenosis--I. Theory and steady flow experiments.

Authors:  C Clark
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  FDA Benchmark Medical Device Flow Models for CFD Validation.

Authors:  Richard A Malinauskas; Prasanna Hariharan; Steven W Day; Luke H Herbertson; Martin Buesen; Ulrich Steinseifer; Kenneth I Aycock; Bryan C Good; Steven Deutsch; Keefe B Manning; Brent A Craven
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2017 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 2.872

6.  Shear stress-associated acquired von Willebrand syndrome in patients with mitral regurgitation.

Authors:  J L Blackshear; E M Wysokinska; R E Safford; C S Thomas; B P Shapiro; S Ung; M E Stark; P Parikh; G S Johns; D Chen
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 5.824

Review 7.  Aortic stenosis: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and medical management of nonsurgical patients.

Authors:  Theresa Cary; Judith Pearce
Journal:  Crit Care Nurse       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.708

8.  Diameters of the thoracic aorta throughout life as measured with helical computed tomography.

Authors:  Alfred Hager; Harald Kaemmerer; Ulrike Rapp-Bernhardt; Sebastian Blücher; Karl Rapp; Thomas M Bernhardt; Michael Galanski; John Hess
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Assessment of turbulent viscous stress using ICOSA 4D Flow MRI for prediction of hemodynamic blood damage.

Authors:  Hojin Ha; Jonas Lantz; Henrik Haraldsson; Belen Casas; Magnus Ziegler; Matts Karlsson; David Saloner; Petter Dyverfeldt; Tino Ebbers
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Role of fluid shear stress in regulating VWF structure, function and related blood disorders.

Authors:  Shobhit Gogia; Sriram Neelamegham
Journal:  Biorheology       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.875

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.