OBJECTIVE: The use of helical computed tomography is well established in the evaluation of the thoracic aorta. Nevertheless, normal diameters and their changes during adult life according to this method are not available. We planned to set up normal diameters for the thoracic aorta of adults obtained by helical computed tomography. METHODS: Seventy adults, 17 to 89 years old, without any signs of cardiovascular disease were investigated with helical computed tomography. Aortic diameters were measured at seven predefined thoracic levels. RESULTS: Aortic diameters (mean +/- SD) were 2.98 +/- 0.46 cm at the aortic valve sinus, 3.09 +/- 0.41 cm at the ascending aorta, 2.94 +/- 0.42 cm proximal to the innominate artery, 2.77 +/- 0.37 cm at the proximal transverse arch, 2.61 +/- 0.41 cm at the distal transverse arch, 2.47 +/- 0.40 cm at the isthmus, and 2.43 +/- 0.35 cm at the diaphragm. Men had slightly longer diameters than did women. All diameters increased with age. There was no influence of weight, height, or body surface area. After normalization to the diameter at diaphragmatic level, no statistically significantly influential factor could be detected. CONCLUSIONS: This study delineates normal intrathoracic aortic diameters for helical computed tomography, including relationships with sex and age. Pathologic dimensions of the aorta should preferably be provided as percentiles or z scores.
OBJECTIVE: The use of helical computed tomography is well established in the evaluation of the thoracic aorta. Nevertheless, normal diameters and their changes during adult life according to this method are not available. We planned to set up normal diameters for the thoracic aorta of adults obtained by helical computed tomography. METHODS: Seventy adults, 17 to 89 years old, without any signs of cardiovascular disease were investigated with helical computed tomography. Aortic diameters were measured at seven predefined thoracic levels. RESULTS: Aortic diameters (mean +/- SD) were 2.98 +/- 0.46 cm at the aortic valve sinus, 3.09 +/- 0.41 cm at the ascending aorta, 2.94 +/- 0.42 cm proximal to the innominate artery, 2.77 +/- 0.37 cm at the proximal transverse arch, 2.61 +/- 0.41 cm at the distal transverse arch, 2.47 +/- 0.40 cm at the isthmus, and 2.43 +/- 0.35 cm at the diaphragm. Men had slightly longer diameters than did women. All diameters increased with age. There was no influence of weight, height, or body surface area. After normalization to the diameter at diaphragmatic level, no statistically significantly influential factor could be detected. CONCLUSIONS: This study delineates normal intrathoracic aortic diameters for helical computed tomography, including relationships with sex and age. Pathologic dimensions of the aorta should preferably be provided as percentiles or z scores.
Authors: Alex Frydrychowicz; Alexander Berger; Alejandro Munoz Del Rio; Maximilian F Russe; Jelena Bock; Andreas Harloff; Michael Markl Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2011-12-30 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Tri-Linh C Lu; Christoph H Huber; Elena Rizzo; Jashmid Dehmeshki; Ludwig K von Segesser; Salah D Qanadli Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2008-09-23 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: N d'ostrevy; F D Ardellier; L Cassagnes; L Ouchchane; K Azarnoush; L Camilleri; L Sakka Journal: Surg Radiol Anat Date: 2016-12-05 Impact factor: 1.246
Authors: Stefan Wolf; Alexander Riess; Julia F Landscheidt; Christianto B Lumenta; Patrick Friederich; Ludwig Schürer Journal: Crit Care Date: 2009-12-14 Impact factor: 9.097