Literature DB >> 15252152

Conservative homologous recombination preferentially repairs DNA double-strand breaks in the S phase of the cell cycle in human cells.

Nasrollah Saleh-Gohari1, Thomas Helleday.   

Abstract

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are repaired by either homologous recombination (HR) or non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) in mammalian cells. Repair with NHEJ or HR using single-strand annealing (SSA) often results in deletions and is generally referred to as non-conservative recombination. Error-free, conservative HR involves strand invasion and requires a homologous DNA template, and therefore it is generally believed that this type of repair occurs preferentially in the late S, G2 and M phases of the cell cycle, when the sister chromatid is available. There are several observations supporting this hypothesis, although it has not been tested directly. Here, we synchronize human SW480SN.3 cells in the G1/G0 (with serum starvation), S (with thymidine block) and M (with nocodazole) phases of the cell cycle and investigate the efficiency of conservative HR repair of an I-SceI-induced DSB. The frequency of HR repair of DSBs was 39 times higher in S-phase cells than in M-phase cells and 24-fold higher than in G1/G0 cells. This low level of conservative HR occurs even though a homologous template is present within the recombination substrate. We propose that this can be explained by an absence of recombination proteins outside the S phase or alternatively that there maybe factors that suppress HR in G1/G0 and M. Furthermore, we found that HR repair of DSBs involves short tract gene conversion in all the phases of the cell cycle. This indicates that the same pathway for conservative HR is employed in the repair of DSBs regardless of phase of the cell cycle and that only the frequency is affected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15252152      PMCID: PMC484186          DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkh703

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  25 in total

Review 1.  Chromosomal stability and the DNA double-stranded break connection.

Authors:  D C van Gent; J H Hoeijmakers; R Kanaar
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Sister chromatid gene conversion is a prominent double-strand break repair pathway in mammalian cells.

Authors:  R D Johnson; M Jasin
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2000-07-03       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 3.  Double-strand-break-induced homologous recombination in mammalian cells.

Authors:  R D Johnson; M Jasin
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.407

4.  Rad52 and Ku bind to different DNA structures produced early in double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Dejan Ristic; Mauro Modesti; Roland Kanaar; Claire Wyman
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-09-15       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Pathways of DNA double-strand break repair during the mammalian cell cycle.

Authors:  Kai Rothkamm; Ines Krüger; Larry H Thompson; Markus Löbrich
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  DNA-dependent protein kinase suppresses double-strand break-induced and spontaneous homologous recombination.

Authors:  Chris Allen; Akihiro Kurimasa; Mark A Brenneman; David J Chen; Jac A Nickoloff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-03-19       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Different roles for nonhomologous end joining and homologous recombination following replication arrest in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Cecilia Lundin; Klaus Erixon; Catherine Arnaudeau; Niklas Schultz; Dag Jenssen; Mark Meuth; Thomas Helleday
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP-1) has a controlling role in homologous recombination.

Authors:  Niklas Schultz; Elena Lopez; Nasrollah Saleh-Gohari; Thomas Helleday
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-09-01       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Defects in homologous recombination repair in mismatch-repair-deficient tumour cell lines.

Authors:  Atul Mohindra; Laura E Hays; Eric N Phillips; Bradley D Preston; Thomas Helleday; Mark Meuth
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2002-09-01       Impact factor: 6.150

10.  Rad51 accumulation at sites of DNA damage and in postreplicative chromatin.

Authors:  S Tashiro; J Walter; A Shinohara; N Kamada; T Cremer
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2000-07-24       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  107 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of gene targeting in higher eukaryotes.

Authors:  Akinori Tokunaga; Hirofumi Anai; Katsuhiro Hanada
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 9.261

2.  BRCA1 and BRCA2 protect against oxidative DNA damage converted into double-strand breaks during DNA replication.

Authors:  Ram Fridlich; Devi Annamalai; Rohini Roy; Giana Bernheim; Simon N Powell
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2015-03-17

3.  Differential usage of alternative pathways of double-strand break repair in Drosophila.

Authors:  Christine R Preston; Carlos C Flores; William R Engels
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-11-19       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Mutations in the extra sex combs and Enhancer of Polycomb genes increase homologous recombination in somatic cells of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Angela M Holmes; Kelly A Weedmark; Gregory B Gloor
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Genome editing: a robust technology for human stem cells.

Authors:  Arun Pandian Chandrasekaran; Minjung Song; Suresh Ramakrishna
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 9.261

6.  Simultaneous reprogramming and gene editing of human fibroblasts.

Authors:  Sara E Howden; James A Thomson; Melissa H Little
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 13.491

7.  Homing endonucleases catalyze double-stranded DNA breaks and somatic transgene excision in Aedes aegypti.

Authors:  B E Traver; M A E Anderson; Z N Adelman
Journal:  Insect Mol Biol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.585

8.  The novel Chk1 inhibitor MK-8776 sensitizes human leukemia cells to HDAC inhibitors by targeting the intra-S checkpoint and DNA replication and repair.

Authors:  Yun Dai; Shuang Chen; Maciej Kmieciak; Liang Zhou; Hui Lin; Xin-Yan Pei; Steven Grant
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 6.261

9.  Interplay of DNA damage and cell cycle signaling at the level of human replication protein A.

Authors:  Gloria E O Borgstahl; Kerry Brader; Adam Mosel; Shengqin Liu; Elisabeth Kremmer; Kaitlin A Goettsch; Carol Kolar; Heinz-Peter Nasheuer; Greg G Oakley
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2014-06-13

10.  The ERCC1/XPF endonuclease is required for completion of homologous recombination at DNA replication forks stalled by inter-strand cross-links.

Authors:  Ali Z Al-Minawi; Yin-Fai Lee; Daniel Håkansson; Fredrik Johansson; Cecilia Lundin; Nasrollah Saleh-Gohari; Niklas Schultz; Dag Jenssen; Helen E Bryant; Mark Meuth; John M Hinz; Thomas Helleday
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.