| Literature DB >> 33158822 |
Bo Sheng1, Yizuo Song1, Yi Liu1, Chenchen Jiang2, Xueqiong Zhu3.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Uterine fibroids are the most common pelvic benign tumour with no satisfactory long-term medical treatment. Recent studies have demonstrated that vitamin D significantly inhibited the growth of fibroids in vitro, vivo and a small-sample clinical trial. Therefore, the aim of this randomised clinical trial (RCT) is to evaluate whether supplementation with vitamin D could reduce the risk and inhibit the growth of uterine fibroids in reproductive stage women. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The open-label, RCT comprises two parts, including parts I and II. In part I, 2230 vitamin D deficiency or vitamin D insufficiency patients without uterine fibroids will be randomly assigned to two groups: intervention group (according to the level of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3, receive 1600 or 800 IU/day of vitamin D3 for 2 years) and control group (followed up at the same time points). By using gynaecological ultrasound examinations, the incidence of uterine fibroids will be employed to measure the outcome in different groups. In part II, 360 uterine fibroids patients with vitamin D deficiency or vitamin D insufficiency will be randomly assigned to intervention group or control group. According to the level of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3, 180 patients will receive 1600 or 800 IU/day of vitamin D3 for 2 years. Control group will receive regular follow-up. The outcome measure will be conducted using gynaecological ultrasound examinations to detect the growth of uterine fibroids in each group. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the institutional review board of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (No. LCKY2018-35). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT03586947 and NCT03584529. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.Entities:
Keywords: clinical trials; gynaecological oncology; protocols & guidelines
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33158822 PMCID: PMC7651728 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038709
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ Open ISSN: 2044-6055 Impact factor: 2.692
The doses of vitamin D supplementation in different clinical trials published since 2010
| Group | Country | Population | Age (years) | Oral vitamin D | Reference |
| Holick | USA | General population | >19 | Risk of vitamin D deficiency: 1500–2000 IU/day; vitamin D deficiency: 50 000 IU/wk for 8 weeks, followed by maintenance therapy of 1500–2000 IU/day | |
| de Boer | USA | Participants with type 2 diabetes | Men aged ≥50 and women aged ≥55 | Vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol 2000 IU/day) and matching inert placebo | |
| Burt | Canada | Healthy adults without osteoporosis | 55–70 | Vitamin D3 at 400 IU/day (n=109), or 4000 IU/day (n=100), or 10 000 IU/day (n=102) for 3 years | |
| Urashima | Japan | Patients with digestive tract cancers ovarall | 30–90 | Vitamin D 2000 IU/day and matching placebo | |
| Scragg | New Zealand | General population | 50–84 | Vitamin D at initial bolus dose of 200 000 IU, followed by maintenance dose of 100 000 IU/month | |
| Aglipay | Canada | Children | 1–5 | Vitamin D at doses of 2000 IU/day (n=349) and 400 IU/day (n=354) | |
| Zittermann | Germany | Heart failure patients | 18–79 | Patient with serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 level <75 nmol/L were randomised to receive 4000 IU/day vitamin D or matching placebo for 3 years | |
| Lappe | USA | Postmenopausal women | ≥55 | Treatment group: 2000 IU/day vitamin D3 and 1500 mg/day calcium; The placebo group: identical placebos | |
| Arora | USA | Low vitamin D status (25-hydroxyvitamin D levels ≤25 ng/mL) patients with SBP of 120–159 mm Hg | 18–50 | High-dose group: 4000 IU/day for 6 months; low-dose group: 400 IU/day for 6 months | |
| Rusińska | Poland | Healthy adults | 19–65 | 800–2000 IU/day |
SBP, systolic blood pressure.
Figure 1Flow chart showing the steps of part Ⅰ in participant recruitment, treatment and analysis. UFs, uterine fibroids.
Flow chart of the study showing timing collection of different variables
| Follow-up (times) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| Time points (months) | 0 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 12 | 15 | 18 | 21 | 24 |
| Informed consent | x | ||||||||
| Medical history | x | ||||||||
| Physical examination | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x |
| Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x |
| Urine pregnancy test | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x |
| Gynecologic ultrasound | x | x | x | x | x | ||||
| Hepatic and renal function | x | x | x | x | x | ||||
| Electrolyte | x | x | x | x | x | ||||
| Blood routine examination | x | x | x | x | x | ||||
| Liver and urinary | x | x | x | ||||||
| Side effect assessment | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | |
| Changes in menstruation | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | |
| Adverse event assessment | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | |
| Vitamin D receptor genotype | x |
Figure 2Flow chart showing the steps of part Ⅱ in participant recruitment, treatment and analysis.
Flow chart of the study showing timing collection of different variables
| Follow-up | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| Months | 0 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 12 | 15 | 18 | 21 | 24 |
| Informed consent | x | ||||||||
| Medical history | x | ||||||||
| Physical examination | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x |
| Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x |
| Urine pregnancy test | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x |
| Gynecologic ultrasound | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x |
| Hepatic and renal function | x | x | x | x | x | ||||
| Electrolyte | x | x | x | x | x | ||||
| Blood routine examination | x | x | x | x | x | ||||
| Liver and urinary | x | x | x | ||||||
| Side effect assessment | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | |
| Changes in menstruation | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | |
| Adverse event assessment | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | |
| Vitamin D receptor genotype | x |