| Literature DB >> 33158239 |
Naoko Takeyama1, Michiko Moriyama1, Kana Kazawa1, Malinda Steenkamp1,2, Md Moshiur Rahman1.
Abstract
We investigated whether an Information and Communication Technology (ICT) application (app) motivated to increase adherence to lifestyle changes, and to improve indicators of metabolic disturbances among Japanese civil servants. A non-randomized, open-label, parallel-group study was conducted with 102 participants aged 20-65 years undergoing a health check during 2016-2017, having overweight and/or elevated glucose concentration. Among them, 63 participants chose Specific Health Guidance (SHG) and ongoing support incorporating the use of an app (ICT group) and 39 individuals chose only SHG (control group). Fifty from the ICT group and 38 from the control group completed the study. After completing the 6-month program, the control group showed a significant decrease in body mass index (p = 0.008), male waist circumference (p < 0.001), systolic blood pressure (BP) (p = 0.005), diastolic BP (p < 0.001), and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (p < 0.001), and increase in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (p = 0.008). However, the ICT group showed a significant decrease in male waist circumference (p < 0.001), diastolic BP (p = 0.003), and HbA1c (p < 0.001), and increase in HDL cholesterol (p = 0.032). The magnitude of change for most indicators tended to be highest for ICT participants (used the app ≥5 times/month). Both groups reported raised awareness on BP and weight. The app use program did not have a major impact after the observation period. Proper action requires frequent use of the app to enhance best results.Entities:
Keywords: ICT application; adherence; health guidance; lifestyle changes; metabolic disturbances; motivation; workers’ health
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33158239 PMCID: PMC7662815 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17218147
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Enrolment of study participants. Note: ICT: information and communication technology; IHG: Intensive Health Guidance; MHG: Motivational Health Guidance.
Figure 2Health guidance program in this study. Note: * IHG program only; HDL: high-density lipoprotein; LDL: low-density lipoprotein; HbA1c: glycated hemoglobin.
Figure 3Health guidance process. Note: ICT: information and communication technology.
Comparing the ICT and control groups at baseline and at 6 months.
| Indicators of Metabolic Disturbances | Baseline Assessment | Assessment at Completion of Intervention 6 Months | Change Between Control and ICT Groups | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control Group | ICT Group | Control Group | ICT Group | Control Group | ICT Group | |||||
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | |||||
| Body mass index (BMI), kg/m2 | 25.3 ± 3.9 | 25.1 ± 4.3 | 0.787 a | 24.8 ± 3.9 | 0.008 c | 24.7 ± 4.1 | 0.088 c | −0.38 ± 0.87 | −0.39 ± 1.00 | 0.787 a |
| Male waist circumference, cm (n = 75) | 89.9 ± 9.4 | 89.1 ± 11.0 | 0.720 b | 86.7 ± 9.2 | <0.001 d | 86.2 ± 10.5 | <0.001 d | −3.2 ± 3.6 | −2.9 ± 3.8 | 0.683 b |
| Female waist circumference, cm (n = 13) | 85.5 ± 11.7 | 75.8 ± 6.6 | 0.239 b | 83.7 ± 11.6 | 0.076 d | 76.7 ± 11.0 | 0.496 d | −1.8 ± 2.3 | −1.5 ± 4.6 | 0.880 b |
| Systolic blood pressure, mmHg | 127.9 ± 19.2 | 124.3 ± 14.3 | 0.325 b | 125.6 ± 13.1 | 0.005 d | 121.7 ± 11.3 | 0.122 d | −2.24 ± 14.46 | −2.60 ± 12.62 | 0.896 b |
| Diastolic blood pressure, mmHg | 82.6 ± 13.1 | 77.9 ± 10.8 | 0.062 b | 77.8 ± 10.7 | <0.001 d | 74.1 ± 9.0 | 0.003 d | -4.74 ± 9.69 | −3.83 ± 9.26 | 0.645 b |
| Triglyceride (TG), mg/dL | 138.0 ± 93.3 | 148.3 ± 199.9 | 0.234 a | 119.2 ± 58.7 | 0.059 c | 128.6 ± 104.3 | 0.237c | −18.87 ± 56.45 | −19.67 ± 168.12 | 0.234 a |
| High-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, mg/dL | 58.9 ± 13.3 | 61.5 ± 17.0 | 0.438 a | 63.6 ± 16.9 | 0.008 c | 63.9 ± 16.0 | 0.032 d | 4.68 ± 9.954 | 2.4 3 ± 8.40 | 0.438 a |
| Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, mg/dL | 128.7 ± 29.8 | 124.1 ± 29.1 | 0.637 a | 134.0 ± 30.6 | 0.097 c | 124.1 ± 27.0 | 0.987 d | 5.32 ± 21.82 | −0.05 ± 24.92 | 0.637 a |
| Glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), % | 6.0 ± 0.9 | 5.7 ± 0.3 | 0.085 a | 5.8 ± 1.3 | 0.001 c | 5.4 ± 0.3 | <0.001 c | −0.18 ± 0.64 | −0.22 ± 0.21 | 0.085 a |
1 Comparing the information and communication technology (ICT) group and control group at baseline; 2 comparing the control group at baseline and at 6 months; 3 comparing the ICT group at baseline and at 6 months; 4 comparing change data between ICT group and control group at 6 months; a Mann–Whitney U test; b Student-t test; c Wilcoxon ranked test; d paired-t test.
Use of ICT app by ICT group.
| Use of ICT Application to Monitor: | <1 Time/Month | 1–4 Times/Month | ≥5 Times/Month | Mean/Month | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blood pressure (n = 38) | n (%) | 8 (21.1%) | 7 (18.4%) | 23 (60.5%) | 7.1 |
| Body weight (n = 47) | n (%) | 12 (25.5%) | 11 (23.4%) | 24 (51.1%) | 9.3 |
| Number of steps (n = 47) | n (%) | 0 | 10 (21.3%) | 37 (78.7%) | 15.1 |
Information and communication technology (ICT) participants who did not use the app to monitor the relevant indicators were excluded from the table.
Comparison of change for ICT participants by frequency of app use.
| Measurement | Use of ICT Application to Register * | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blood Pressure | Body Weight | Number of Steps | ||||||||
| Control n = 38 | <5 times n = 15 | ≥5 times n = 23 | Control n = 38 | <5 times n = 23 | ≥5 times n = 24 | Control n = 38 | <5 times n = 10 | ≥5 times n = 37 | ||
| Body mass index (BMI), kg/m2 | Mean | −0.4 | −0.1 | −0.8 | −0.4 | −0.2 | −0.7 | −0.4 | −0.1 | −0.6 |
| SD | ±0.9 | ±0.8 | ±1.1 | ±0.9 | ±0.9 | ±1.1 | ±0.9 | ±0.7 | ±1.1 | |
| 0.007 | 0.053 | 0.093 | ||||||||
| Systolic blood pressure, mmHg | Mean | −2.2 | −0.1 | -6.8 | −2.2 | −0.9 | −5 | −2.2 | 2.4 | −5.7 |
| SD | ±14.5 | ±12.9 | ±11.3 | ±14.5 | ±12.3 | ±12.9 | ±14.5 | ±12.6 | ±11.8 | |
| 0.152 | 0.397 | 0.126 | ||||||||
| Diastolic blood pressure, mmHg | Mean | −4.7 | −3.6 | −4.2 | −4.7 | −4.4 | −3 | −4.7 | −3.7 | −3.9 |
| SD | ±9.7 | ±9.3 | ±9.5 | ±9.7 | ±9.6 | ±8.9 | ±9.7 | ±7.8 | ±10.2 | |
| 0.79 | 0.597 | 0.745 | ||||||||
| Waist circumference, cm | Mean | −2.9 | −1.5 | −4.7 | −2.9 | −1.6 | −4.3 | −2.9 | −1.7 | −3.3 |
| SD | ±3.5 | ±3.4 | ±4.2 | ±3.5 | ±3.3 | ±4.4 | ±3.5 | ±2.7 | ±4.5 | |
| 0.001 | 0.010 | 0.161 | ||||||||
| Triglycerides, mg/dL | Mean | −0.4 | −0.1 | −0.8 | −0.4 | −0.2 | −0.7 | −0.4 | −0.1 | −0.6 |
| SD | ±0.9 | ±0.8 | ±1.1 | ±0.9 | ±0.9 | ±1.1 | ±0.9 | ±0.7 | ±1.1 | |
| 0.007 | 0.053 | 0.093 | ||||||||
| HDL cholesterol, mg/dL | Mean | −2.2 | −0.1 | −6.8 | −2.2 | −0.9 | −5 | −2.2 | 2.4 | −5.7 |
| SD | ±14.5 | ±12.9 | ±11.3 | ±14.5 | ±12.3 | ±12.9 | ±14.5 | ±12.6 | ±11.8 | |
| 0.152 | 0.397 | 0.126 | ||||||||
| LDL cholesterol, mg/dL | Mean | −4.7 | −3.6 | −4.2 | −4.7 | −4.4 | −3 | −4.7 | −3.7 | −3.9 |
| SD | ±9.7 | ±9.3 | ±9.5 | ±9.7 | ±9.6 | ±8.9 | ±9.7 | ±7.8 | ±10.2 | |
| 0.79 | 0.597 | 0.745 | ||||||||
| HbA1c, % | Mean | −2.9 | −1.5 | −4.7 | −2.9 | −1.6 | −4.3 | −2.9 | −1.7 | −3.3 |
| SD | ±3.5 | ±3.4 | ±4.2 | ±3.5 | ±3.3 | ±4.4 | ±3.5 | ±2.7 | ±4.5 | |
| 0.001 | 0.010 | 0.161 | ||||||||
* Person who never used excluded; ICT: information and communication technology; HDL: high-density lipoprotein; LDL: low-density lipoprotein; HbA1c: glycated hemoglobin.
Comparing the indicators for the ICT and control groups for whom the program was judged to be effective or where they maintained results.
| Indicator | ICT Group | Control Group | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Body mass index | 31 (62.0%) | 24 (63.2%) | 0.912 |
| Waist circumference | 25 (50.0%) | 19 (50.0%) | 1.000 |
| Systolic blood pressure | 38 (76.0%) | 14 (36.8%) | 0.191 |
| Diastolic blood pressure | 44 (88.0%) | 29 (76.3%) | 0.149 |
| Triglycerides | 37 (74.0%) | 28 (73.7%) | 0.973 |
| HDL cholesterol | 47 (94.0%) | 37 (97.4%) | 0.452 |
| LDL cholesterol | 25 (50.0%) | 14 (36.8%) | 0.218 |
| HbA1c | 39 (78.0%) | 25 (65.8%) | 0.203 |
* Chi-square test; ICT: information and communication technology; HDL: high-density lipoprotein; LDL: low-density lipoprotein; HbA1c: glycated hemoglobin.
Comparing insight into health behavior between the ICT and control groups.
| Improvement of Lifestyle (n, %) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Strongly agree | Agree | Neither | Disagree | Strongly disagree | 0.966 | |
| ICT group | 4 (9.8%) | 24 (58.5%) | 8 (19.5%) | 3 (7.3%) | 2 (4.9%) | |
| Control group | 3 (11.1%) | 15 (56.6%) | 6 (22.2%) | 3 (11.1%) | 0 | |
|
| ||||||
| Strongly agree | Agree | Neither | Disagree | Strongly disagree | 0.226 | |
| ICT group | 5 (12.2%) | 27 (65.9%) | 4 (9.8%) | 1 (2.4%) | 4 (9.8%) | |
| Control group | 3 (11.1%) | 13 (48.1%) | 5 (18.5%) | 5 (18.5%) | 1 (3.7%) | |
|
| ||||||
| Strongly agree | Agree | Neither | Disagree | Strongly disagree | 0.197 | |
| ICT group | 21 (51.2%) | 15 (36.6%) | 3 (7.3%) | 1 (2.4%) | 1 (2.4%) | |
| Control group | 8 (29.6%) | 17 (63.0%) | 1 (3.7%) | 0 | 1 (3.7%) | |
|
| ||||||
| Strongly agree | Agree | Neither | Disagree | Strongly disagree | 0.980 | |
| ICT group | 7 (17.1%) | 10 (24.4) | 6 (14.6) | 10 (24.4) | 8 (19.5) | |
| Control group | 3 (11.1%) | 8 (29.6) | 6 (22.2) | 5 (18.5) | 5 (18.5) | |
|
| ||||||
| Strongly agree | Agree | Neither | Disagree | Strongly disagree | 0.188 | |
| ICT group | 25 (61.0%) | 14 (34.1%) | 0 | 1 (2.4%) | 1 (2.4%) | |
| Control group | 12 (44.4%) | 13 (48.1%) | 0 | 1 (3.7%) | 1 (3.7%) | |
|
| ||||||
| Very well | Well | Neither | Not well | Badly/Not at all | 0.078 | |
| ICT group | 4 (9.8%) | 12 (29.3%) | 12 (29.3%) | 3 (7.3%) | 10 (24.3%) | |
| Control group | 10 (37.0%) | 5 (18.5%) | 4 (14.8%) | 4 (14.8%) | 4 (14.8%) | |
|
| ||||||
| Very effective | Effective | Neither | Somewhat ineffective | Not effective at all | 0.399 | |
| ICT group | 1 (2.4%) | 21 (51.2%) | 8 (19.5%) | 2 (4.9%) | 9 (22.0%) | |
| Control group | 2 (7.4%) | 11 (40.7%) | 2 (7.4%) | 2 (7.4%) | 10 (37.0%) | |
* Mann–Whitney U test; ICT: information and communication technology; Diet: based on individual dietary habit, the participant was advised on energy balance (reduce excessive energy intake), nutritional balance, balance fat intake, reduce salt intake, eat 3 times a day, do not eat too late, eat plenty of vegetables and vegetables first, reduce snacks and sugar containing soft drink consumption, and reduce alcohol consumption; Exercise: aerobic exercise of 30–60 min per day, 3 days per week is recommended. However, based on individual lifestyle and medical risk assessment, individually tailored exercise was recommended as to increase the daily activities and walking an extra 10 min.