OBJECTIVE: To review eHealth intervention studies for adults and children that targeted behavior change for physical activity, healthy eating, or both behaviors. DATA SOURCES: Systematic literature searches were performed using five databases: MEDLINE, PsychInfo, CINAHL, ERIC, and the Cochrane Library to retrieve articles. STUDY INCLUSION AND EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Articles published in scientific journals were included if they evaluated an intervention for physical activity and/or dietary behaviors, or focused on weight loss, used randomized or quasi-experimental designs, measured outcomes at baseline and a follow-up period, and included an intervention where participants interacted with some type of electronic technology either as the main intervention or an adjunct component. All studies were published between 2000 and 2005. RESULTS: Eighty-six publications were initially identified, of which 49 met the inclusion criteria (13 physical activity publications, 16 dietary behaviors publications, and 20 weight loss or both physical activity and diet publications), and represented 47 different studies. Studies were described on multiple dimensions, including sample characteristics, design, intervention, measures, and results. eHealth interventions were superior to comparison groups for 21 of 41 (51%) studies (3 physical activity, 7 diet, 11 weight loss/physical activity and diet). Twenty-four studies had indeterminate results, and in four studies the comparison conditions outperformed eHealth interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Published studies of eHealth interventions for physical activity and dietary behavior change are in their infancy. Results indicated mixed findings related to the effectiveness of eHealth interventions. Interventions that feature interactive technologies need to be refined and more rigorously evaluated to fully determine their potential as tools to facilitate health behavior change.
OBJECTIVE: To review eHealth intervention studies for adults and children that targeted behavior change for physical activity, healthy eating, or both behaviors. DATA SOURCES: Systematic literature searches were performed using five databases: MEDLINE, PsychInfo, CINAHL, ERIC, and the Cochrane Library to retrieve articles. STUDY INCLUSION AND EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Articles published in scientific journals were included if they evaluated an intervention for physical activity and/or dietary behaviors, or focused on weight loss, used randomized or quasi-experimental designs, measured outcomes at baseline and a follow-up period, and included an intervention where participants interacted with some type of electronic technology either as the main intervention or an adjunct component. All studies were published between 2000 and 2005. RESULTS: Eighty-six publications were initially identified, of which 49 met the inclusion criteria (13 physical activity publications, 16 dietary behaviors publications, and 20 weight loss or both physical activity and diet publications), and represented 47 different studies. Studies were described on multiple dimensions, including sample characteristics, design, intervention, measures, and results. eHealth interventions were superior to comparison groups for 21 of 41 (51%) studies (3 physical activity, 7 diet, 11 weight loss/physical activity and diet). Twenty-four studies had indeterminate results, and in four studies the comparison conditions outperformed eHealth interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Published studies of eHealth interventions for physical activity and dietary behavior change are in their infancy. Results indicated mixed findings related to the effectiveness of eHealth interventions. Interventions that feature interactive technologies need to be refined and more rigorously evaluated to fully determine their potential as tools to facilitate health behavior change.
Authors: Marilyn Frenn; Shelly Malin; Roger L Brown; Yvonne Greer; Jaime Fox; Jennifer Greer; Sarah Smyczek Journal: Appl Nurs Res Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 2.257
Authors: James O Prochaska; Wayne F Velicer; Colleen Redding; Joseph S Rossi; Michael Goldstein; Judith DePue; Geoffrey W Greene; Susan R Rossi; Xiaowu Sun; Joseph L Fava; Robert Laforge; William Rakowski; Brett A Plummer Journal: Prev Med Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Marieke Verheijden; J Carel Bakx; Reinier Akkermans; Henk van den Hoogen; N Marshall Godwin; Walter Rosser; Wija van Staveren; Chris van Weel Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2004-12-16 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Julie B Wang; Lisa A Cadmus-Bertram; Loki Natarajan; Martha M White; Hala Madanat; Jeanne F Nichols; Guadalupe X Ayala; John P Pierce Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2015-06-02 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: Abby C King; Ines Campero; Jylana L Sheats; Cynthia M Castro Sweet; Dulce Garcia; Aldo Chazaro; German Blanco; Michelle Hauser; Fernando Fierros; David K Ahn; Jose Diaz; Monica Done; Juan Fernandez; Timothy Bickmore Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2017-07-22 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: K Patrick; S J Marshall; E P Davila; J K Kolodziejczyk; J H Fowler; K J Calfas; J S Huang; C L Rock; W G Griswold; A Gupta; G Merchant; G J Norman; F Raab; M C Donohue; B J Fogg; T N Robinson Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2013-11-09 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Abby C King; Sandra J Winter; Jylana L Sheats; Lisa G Rosas; Matthew P Buman; Deborah Salvo; Nicole M Rodriguez; Rebecca A Seguin; Mika Moran; Randi Garber; Bonnie Broderick; Susan G Zieff; Olga Lucia Sarmiento; Silvia A Gonzalez; Ann Banchoff; Juan Rivera Dommarco Journal: Transl J Am Coll Sports Med Date: 2016-05-15
Authors: Abby C King; David K Ahn; Brian M Oliveira; Audie A Atienza; Cynthia M Castro; Christopher D Gardner Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 5.043