Literature DB >> 33156407

Analysis of failed therapy evaluations in radioembolization of primary and secondary liver cancers.

Michael Köhler1, Moritz Wildgruber1,2, Max Masthoff3, Philipp Schindler1, Fabian Harders1, Walter Heindel1, Christian Wilms4, Hartmut H Schmidt4, Andreas Pascher5, Lars Stegger6, Kambiz Rahbar6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To analyze patients' characteristics and reasons for not performing planned transarterial radioembolization (TARE) in liver cancer after 99mTc-labeled macroaggregated albumin (99mTc-MAA) evaluation.
METHODS: In this retrospective single-center cohort, all patients undergoing 99mTc-MAA evaluation prior to planned TARE for primary or secondary liver cancer between 2009 and 2018 were analyzed. Patients were assigned to either "TARE" or "no TARE" group. Patients' characteristics, arising reasons for not performing the planned TARE treatment as well as predictive factors for occurrence of these causes were analyzed.
RESULTS: 436 patients [male = 248, female = 188, median age 62 (23-88) years] with 99mTc-MAA evaluation prior to planned TARE of primary or secondary liver cancer were included in this study. 148 patients (33.9%) did not receive planned TARE. Patients with a hepatic tumor burden > 50%, no liver cirrhosis, no previous therapies and a higher bilirubin were significantly more frequent in "no TARE" compared to "TARE" group. Main reasons for not performing TARE were extrahepatic tracer accumulation (n = 70, 40.5%), non-target accumulation of 99mTc-MAA (n = 27, 15.6%) or a hepatopulmonary shunt fraction of more than 20% (n = 23, 13.3%). Independent preprocedural parameters for not performing planned TARE were elevated bilirubin (p = 0.021) and creatinine (p = 0.018) and lower MELD score (p = 0.031).
CONCLUSION: A substantial number of patients are precluded from TARE following 99mTc-MAA evaluation, which is, therefore, implicitly needed to determine contraindications to TARE and should not be refrained from in pretreatment process. However, a preceding careful patient selection is needed especially in patients with high hepatic tumor burden and alteration in lab parameters.

Entities:  

Keywords:  99mTc-macroaggregated albumin; Liver cancer; Pretreatment evaluation; Radioembolization

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33156407     DOI: 10.1007/s00432-020-03443-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0171-5216            Impact factor:   4.553


  25 in total

1.  The significance of 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT liver perfusion imaging in treatment planning for 90Y-microsphere selective internal radiation treatment.

Authors:  Hojjat Ahmadzadehfar; Amir Sabet; Kim Biermann; Marianne Muckle; Holger Brockmann; Christiane Kuhl; Kai Wilhelm; Hans-Jürgen Biersack; Samer Ezziddin
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Predictive Value of 99mTc-MAA SPECT for 90Y-Labeled Resin Microsphere Distribution in Radioembolization of Primary and Secondary Hepatic Tumors.

Authors:  Harun Ilhan; Anna Goritschan; Philipp Paprottka; Tobias F Jakobs; Wolfgang P Fendler; Andrei Todica; Peter Bartenstein; Marcus Hacker; Alexander R Haug
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Biodistribution of 99mTc-MAA on SPECT/CT performed for 90Y radioembolization therapy planning: a pictorial review.

Authors:  J J Bailey; Y Dewaraja; D Hubers; R N Srinivasa; K A Frey
Journal:  Clin Transl Imaging       Date:  2017-09-11

4.  Indicators of Lung Shunt Fraction Determined by Technetium-99 m Macroaggregated Albumin in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Joseph Ralph Kallini; Ahmed Gabr; Ryan Hickey; Laura Kulik; Kush Desai; Yihe Yang; Vanessa L Gates; Ahsun Riaz; Riad Salem; Robert J Lewandowski
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  SIRveNIB: Selective Internal Radiation Therapy Versus Sorafenib in Asia-Pacific Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Pierce K H Chow; Mihir Gandhi; Say-Beng Tan; Maung Win Khin; Ariunaa Khasbazar; Janus Ong; Su Pin Choo; Peng Chung Cheow; Chanisa Chotipanich; Kieron Lim; Laurentius A Lesmana; Tjakra W Manuaba; Boon Koon Yoong; Aloysius Raj; Chiong Soon Law; Ian H Y Cua; Rolley R Lobo; Catherine S C Teh; Yun Hwan Kim; Yun Won Jong; Ho-Seong Han; Si-Hyun Bae; Hyun-Ki Yoon; Rheun-Chuan Lee; Chien-Fu Hung; Cheng-Yuan Peng; Po-Chin Liang; Adam Bartlett; Kenneth Y Y Kok; Choon-Hua Thng; Albert Su-Chong Low; Anthony S W Goh; Kiang Hiong Tay; Richard H G Lo; Brian K P Goh; David C E Ng; Ganesh Lekurwale; Wei Ming Liew; Val Gebski; Kenneth S W Mak; Khee Chee Soo
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Transarterial hepatic yttrium-90 radioembolization in patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: factors associated with prolonged survival.

Authors:  Ralf-T Hoffmann; Philipp M Paprottka; Agnes Schön; Fabian Bamberg; Alexander Haug; Eva-Maria Dürr; Barbara Rauch; Christoph T Trumm; Tobias F Jakobs; Thomas K Helmberger; Maximilian F Reiser; Frank T Kolligs
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 2.740

7.  Effect of Primary Tumor Side on Survival Outcomes in Untreated Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer When Selective Internal Radiation Therapy Is Added to Chemotherapy: Combined Analysis of Two Randomized Controlled Studies.

Authors:  Peter Gibbs; Volker Heinemann; Navesh K Sharma; Julien Taieb; Jens Ricke; Marc Peeters; Michael Findlay; Bridget Robinson; Christopher Jackson; Andrew Strickland; Val Gebski; Mark Van Buskirk; Huaqing Zhao; Guy van Hazel
Journal:  Clin Colorectal Cancer       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 4.481

8.  Radioembolisation with Yttrium-90 microspheres: an effective treatment modality for unresectable liver metastases.

Authors:  Lourens Bester; Baerbel Meteling; Nicholas Pocock; Akshat Saxena; Terence C Chua; David L Morris
Journal:  J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 1.735

9.  Radioembolisation for liver metastases: results from a prospective 151 patient multi-institutional phase II study.

Authors:  Al B Benson; Jean-Francois Geschwind; Mary F Mulcahy; William Rilling; Gary Siskin; Greg Wiseman; James Cunningham; Bonny Houghton; Mason Ross; Khairuddin Memon; James Andrews; Chad J Fleming; Joseph Herman; Halla Nimeiri; Robert J Lewandowski; Riad Salem
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2013-06-15       Impact factor: 9.162

10.  Utility of 'dual phase' cone beam computed tomography during radioembolisation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: what is really changing in flow dynamics before and after 90Y delivery?

Authors:  Aysegul Gormez; Fatma Gonca Eldem; Bilge Volkan Salanci; Murat Fani Bozkurt; Omer Ugur; Bora Peynircioglu
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2020-01-14
View more
  1 in total

1.  Use of X-Ray Fluorescence Microscopy for Studies on Research Models of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Tatjana Paunesku; Andrew C Gordon; Sarah White; Kathleen Harris; Olga Antipova; Evan Maxey; Stefan Vogt; Anthony Smith; Luiza Daddario; Daniele Procissi; Andrew Larson; Gayle E Woloschak
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-08-20
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.