Michael Köhler1, Moritz Wildgruber1,2, Max Masthoff3, Philipp Schindler1, Fabian Harders1, Walter Heindel1, Christian Wilms4, Hartmut H Schmidt4, Andreas Pascher5, Lars Stegger6, Kambiz Rahbar6. 1. Institute of Clinical Radiology, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Munster, Germany. 2. Klinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie, Klinikum Der Universität München, Munich, Germany. 3. Institute of Clinical Radiology, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Munster, Germany. max.masthoff@ukmuenster.de. 4. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany. 5. Department for General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany. 6. Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To analyze patients' characteristics and reasons for not performing planned transarterial radioembolization (TARE) in liver cancer after 99mTc-labeled macroaggregated albumin (99mTc-MAA) evaluation. METHODS: In this retrospective single-center cohort, all patients undergoing 99mTc-MAA evaluation prior to planned TARE for primary or secondary liver cancer between 2009 and 2018 were analyzed. Patients were assigned to either "TARE" or "no TARE" group. Patients' characteristics, arising reasons for not performing the planned TARE treatment as well as predictive factors for occurrence of these causes were analyzed. RESULTS: 436 patients [male = 248, female = 188, median age 62 (23-88) years] with 99mTc-MAA evaluation prior to planned TARE of primary or secondary liver cancer were included in this study. 148 patients (33.9%) did not receive planned TARE. Patients with a hepatic tumor burden > 50%, no liver cirrhosis, no previous therapies and a higher bilirubin were significantly more frequent in "no TARE" compared to "TARE" group. Main reasons for not performing TARE were extrahepatic tracer accumulation (n = 70, 40.5%), non-target accumulation of 99mTc-MAA (n = 27, 15.6%) or a hepatopulmonary shunt fraction of more than 20% (n = 23, 13.3%). Independent preprocedural parameters for not performing planned TARE were elevated bilirubin (p = 0.021) and creatinine (p = 0.018) and lower MELD score (p = 0.031). CONCLUSION: A substantial number of patients are precluded from TARE following 99mTc-MAA evaluation, which is, therefore, implicitly needed to determine contraindications to TARE and should not be refrained from in pretreatment process. However, a preceding careful patient selection is needed especially in patients with high hepatic tumor burden and alteration in lab parameters.
PURPOSE: To analyze patients' characteristics and reasons for not performing planned transarterial radioembolization (TARE) in liver cancer after 99mTc-labeled macroaggregated albumin (99mTc-MAA) evaluation. METHODS: In this retrospective single-center cohort, all patients undergoing 99mTc-MAA evaluation prior to planned TARE for primary or secondary liver cancer between 2009 and 2018 were analyzed. Patients were assigned to either "TARE" or "no TARE" group. Patients' characteristics, arising reasons for not performing the planned TARE treatment as well as predictive factors for occurrence of these causes were analyzed. RESULTS: 436 patients [male = 248, female = 188, median age 62 (23-88) years] with 99mTc-MAA evaluation prior to planned TARE of primary or secondary liver cancer were included in this study. 148 patients (33.9%) did not receive planned TARE. Patients with a hepatic tumor burden > 50%, no liver cirrhosis, no previous therapies and a higher bilirubin were significantly more frequent in "no TARE" compared to "TARE" group. Main reasons for not performing TARE were extrahepatic tracer accumulation (n = 70, 40.5%), non-target accumulation of 99mTc-MAA (n = 27, 15.6%) or a hepatopulmonary shunt fraction of more than 20% (n = 23, 13.3%). Independent preprocedural parameters for not performing planned TARE were elevated bilirubin (p = 0.021) and creatinine (p = 0.018) and lower MELD score (p = 0.031). CONCLUSION: A substantial number of patients are precluded from TARE following 99mTc-MAA evaluation, which is, therefore, implicitly needed to determine contraindications to TARE and should not be refrained from in pretreatment process. However, a preceding careful patient selection is needed especially in patients with high hepatic tumor burden and alteration in lab parameters.
Authors: Harun Ilhan; Anna Goritschan; Philipp Paprottka; Tobias F Jakobs; Wolfgang P Fendler; Andrei Todica; Peter Bartenstein; Marcus Hacker; Alexander R Haug Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2015-08-27 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Joseph Ralph Kallini; Ahmed Gabr; Ryan Hickey; Laura Kulik; Kush Desai; Yihe Yang; Vanessa L Gates; Ahsun Riaz; Riad Salem; Robert J Lewandowski Journal: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Date: 2017-03-09 Impact factor: 2.740
Authors: Pierce K H Chow; Mihir Gandhi; Say-Beng Tan; Maung Win Khin; Ariunaa Khasbazar; Janus Ong; Su Pin Choo; Peng Chung Cheow; Chanisa Chotipanich; Kieron Lim; Laurentius A Lesmana; Tjakra W Manuaba; Boon Koon Yoong; Aloysius Raj; Chiong Soon Law; Ian H Y Cua; Rolley R Lobo; Catherine S C Teh; Yun Hwan Kim; Yun Won Jong; Ho-Seong Han; Si-Hyun Bae; Hyun-Ki Yoon; Rheun-Chuan Lee; Chien-Fu Hung; Cheng-Yuan Peng; Po-Chin Liang; Adam Bartlett; Kenneth Y Y Kok; Choon-Hua Thng; Albert Su-Chong Low; Anthony S W Goh; Kiang Hiong Tay; Richard H G Lo; Brian K P Goh; David C E Ng; Ganesh Lekurwale; Wei Ming Liew; Val Gebski; Kenneth S W Mak; Khee Chee Soo Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2018-03-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Ralf-T Hoffmann; Philipp M Paprottka; Agnes Schön; Fabian Bamberg; Alexander Haug; Eva-Maria Dürr; Barbara Rauch; Christoph T Trumm; Tobias F Jakobs; Thomas K Helmberger; Maximilian F Reiser; Frank T Kolligs Journal: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Date: 2011-03-24 Impact factor: 2.740
Authors: Peter Gibbs; Volker Heinemann; Navesh K Sharma; Julien Taieb; Jens Ricke; Marc Peeters; Michael Findlay; Bridget Robinson; Christopher Jackson; Andrew Strickland; Val Gebski; Mark Van Buskirk; Huaqing Zhao; Guy van Hazel Journal: Clin Colorectal Cancer Date: 2018-06-12 Impact factor: 4.481
Authors: Al B Benson; Jean-Francois Geschwind; Mary F Mulcahy; William Rilling; Gary Siskin; Greg Wiseman; James Cunningham; Bonny Houghton; Mason Ross; Khairuddin Memon; James Andrews; Chad J Fleming; Joseph Herman; Halla Nimeiri; Robert J Lewandowski; Riad Salem Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2013-06-15 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Tatjana Paunesku; Andrew C Gordon; Sarah White; Kathleen Harris; Olga Antipova; Evan Maxey; Stefan Vogt; Anthony Smith; Luiza Daddario; Daniele Procissi; Andrew Larson; Gayle E Woloschak Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2021-08-20