| Literature DB >> 29498924 |
Pierce K H Chow1, Mihir Gandhi1, Say-Beng Tan1, Maung Win Khin1, Ariunaa Khasbazar1, Janus Ong1, Su Pin Choo1, Peng Chung Cheow1, Chanisa Chotipanich1, Kieron Lim1, Laurentius A Lesmana1, Tjakra W Manuaba1, Boon Koon Yoong1, Aloysius Raj1, Chiong Soon Law1, Ian H Y Cua1, Rolley R Lobo1, Catherine S C Teh1, Yun Hwan Kim1, Yun Won Jong1, Ho-Seong Han1, Si-Hyun Bae1, Hyun-Ki Yoon1, Rheun-Chuan Lee1, Chien-Fu Hung1, Cheng-Yuan Peng1, Po-Chin Liang1, Adam Bartlett1, Kenneth Y Y Kok1, Choon-Hua Thng1, Albert Su-Chong Low1, Anthony S W Goh1, Kiang Hiong Tay1, Richard H G Lo1, Brian K P Goh1, David C E Ng1, Ganesh Lekurwale1, Wei Ming Liew1, Val Gebski1, Kenneth S W Mak1, Khee Chee Soo1.
Abstract
Purpose Selective internal radiation therapy or radioembolization (RE) shows efficacy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) limited to the liver. This study compared the safety and efficacy of RE and sorafenib in patients with locally advanced HCC. Patients and Methods SIRveNIB (selective internal radiation therapy v sorafenib), an open-label, investigator-initiated, phase III trial, compared yttrium-90 (90Y) resin microspheres RE with sorafenib 800 mg/d in patients with locally advanced HCC in a two-tailed study designed for superiority/detriment. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 and stratified by center and presence of portal vein thrombosis. Primary end point was overall survival (OS). Efficacy analyses were performed in the intention-to-treat population and safety analyses in the treated population. Results A total of 360 patients were randomly assigned (RE, 182; sorafenib, 178) from 11 countries in the Asia-Pacific region. In the RE and sorafenib groups, 28.6% and 9.0%, respectively, failed to receive assigned therapy without significant cross-over to either group. Median OS was 8.8 and 10.0 months with RE and sorafenib, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.9 to 1.4; P = .36). A total of 1,468 treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were reported (RE, 437; sorafenib, 1,031). Significantly fewer patients in the RE than sorafenib group had grade ≥ 3 AEs (36 of 130 [27.7%]) v 82 of 162 [50.6%]; P < .001). The most common grade ≥ 3 AEs were ascites (five of 130 [3.8%] v four of 162 [2.5%] patients), abdominal pain (three [2.3%] v two [1.2%] patients), anemia (zero v four [2.5%] patients), and radiation hepatitis (two [1.5%] v zero [0%] patients). Fewer patients in the RE group (27 of 130 [20.8%]) than in the sorafenib group (57 of 162 [35.2%]) had serious AEs. Conclusion In patients with locally advanced HCC, OS did not differ significantly between RE and sorafenib. The improved toxicity profile of RE may inform treatment choice in selected patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29498924 DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.76.0892
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Oncol ISSN: 0732-183X Impact factor: 44.544