Literature DB >> 33155035

An efficient and robust approach to Mendelian randomization with measured pleiotropic effects in a high-dimensional setting.

Andrew J Grant1, Stephen Burgess2.   

Abstract

Valid estimation of a causal effect using instrumental variables requires that all of the instruments are independent of the outcome conditional on the risk factor of interest and any confounders. In Mendelian randomization studies with large numbers of genetic variants used as instruments, it is unlikely that this condition will be met. Any given genetic variant could be associated with a large number of traits, all of which represent potential pathways to the outcome which bypass the risk factor of interest. Such pleiotropy can be accounted for using standard multivariable Mendelian randomization with all possible pleiotropic traits included as covariates. However, the estimator obtained in this way will be inefficient if some of the covariates do not truly sit on pleiotropic pathways to the outcome. We present a method that uses regularization to identify which out of a set of potential covariates need to be accounted for in a Mendelian randomization analysis in order to produce an efficient and robust estimator of a causal effect. The method can be used in the case where individual-level data are not available and the analysis must rely on summary-level data only. It can be used where there are any number of potential pleiotropic covariates up to the number of genetic variants less one. We show the results of simulation studies that demonstrate the performance of the proposed regularization method in realistic settings. We also illustrate the method in an applied example which looks at the causal effect of urate plasma concentration on coronary heart disease.
© The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Causal inference; Instrumental variables; Lasso; Mendelian randomization; Multivariable; Pleiotropy; Summarized data

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 33155035      PMCID: PMC9007434          DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxaa045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biostatistics        ISSN: 1465-4644            Impact factor:   5.899


  32 in total

1.  Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent.

Authors:  Jerome Friedman; Trevor Hastie; Rob Tibshirani
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.440

2.  Multivariable Mendelian randomization: the use of pleiotropic genetic variants to estimate causal effects.

Authors:  Stephen Burgess; Simon G Thompson
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Network Mendelian randomization: using genetic variants as instrumental variables to investigate mediation in causal pathways.

Authors:  Stephen Burgess; Rhian M Daniel; Adam S Butterworth; Simon G Thompson
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 7.196

4.  Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression.

Authors:  Jack Bowden; George Davey Smith; Stephen Burgess
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 7.196

5.  Two-sample Mendelian randomization: avoiding the downsides of a powerful, widely applicable but potentially fallible technique.

Authors:  Fernando Pires Hartwig; Neil Martin Davies; Gibran Hemani; George Davey Smith
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 7.196

6.  Robust inference in summary data Mendelian randomization via the zero modal pleiotropy assumption.

Authors:  Fernando Pires Hartwig; George Davey Smith; Jack Bowden
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 7.196

7.  Constrained instruments and their application to Mendelian randomization with pleiotropy.

Authors:  Lai Jiang; Karim Oualkacha; Vanessa Didelez; Antonio Ciampi; Pedro Rosa-Neto; Andrea L Benedet; Sulantha Mathotaarachchi; John Brent Richards; Celia M T Greenwood
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2019-01-12       Impact factor: 2.135

8.  An examination of multivariable Mendelian randomization in the single-sample and two-sample summary data settings.

Authors:  Eleanor Sanderson; George Davey Smith; Frank Windmeijer; Jack Bowden
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 7.196

9.  Consistent Estimation in Mendelian Randomization with Some Invalid Instruments Using a Weighted Median Estimator.

Authors:  Jack Bowden; George Davey Smith; Philip C Haycock; Stephen Burgess
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 2.135

10.  Urate, Blood Pressure, and Cardiovascular Disease: Evidence From Mendelian Randomization and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Dipender Gill; Alan C Cameron; Evropi Theodoratou; Jesse Dawson; Ioanna Tzoulaki; Stephen Burgess; Xue Li; Daniel J Doherty; Ville Karhunen; Azmil H Abdul-Rahim; Martin Taylor-Rowan; Verena Zuber; Philip S Tsao; Derek Klarin; Evangelos Evangelou; Paul Elliott; Scott M Damrauer; Terence J Quinn; Abbas Dehghan
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 9.897

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Statistical methods for Mendelian randomization in genome-wide association studies: A review.

Authors:  Frederick J Boehm; Xiang Zhou
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2022-05-14       Impact factor: 6.155

2.  Pleiotropy robust methods for multivariable Mendelian randomization.

Authors:  Andrew J Grant; Stephen Burgess
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 2.373

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.