Literature DB >> 33356394

Urate, Blood Pressure, and Cardiovascular Disease: Evidence From Mendelian Randomization and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials.

Dipender Gill1,2,3,4,5, Alan C Cameron6, Evropi Theodoratou7,8, Jesse Dawson6, Ioanna Tzoulaki1,9, Stephen Burgess10,11, Xue Li7,12, Daniel J Doherty6, Ville Karhunen1, Azmil H Abdul-Rahim13, Martin Taylor-Rowan6, Verena Zuber1,10, Philip S Tsao14, Derek Klarin15,16,17,18, Evangelos Evangelou1, Paul Elliott1,9,19, Scott M Damrauer, Terence J Quinn6, Abbas Dehghan1,9.   

Abstract

Serum urate has been implicated in hypertension and cardiovascular disease, but it is not known whether it is exerting a causal effect. To investigate this, we performed Mendelian randomization analysis using data from UK Biobank, Million Veterans Program and genome-wide association study consortia, and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. The main Mendelian randomization analyses showed that every 1-SD increase in genetically predicted serum urate was associated with an increased risk of coronary heart disease (odds ratio, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.10-1.30]; P=4×10-5), peripheral artery disease (1.12 [95% CI, 1.03-1.21]; P=9×10-3), and stroke (1.11 [95% CI, 1.05-1.18]; P=2×10-4). In Mendelian randomization mediation analyses, elevated blood pressure was estimated to mediate approximately one-third of the effect of urate on cardiovascular disease risk. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials showed a favorable effect of urate-lowering treatment on systolic blood pressure (mean difference, -2.55 mm Hg [95% CI, -4.06 to -1.05]; P=1×10-3) and major adverse cardiovascular events in those with previous cardiovascular disease (odds ratio, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.22-0.73]; P=3×10-3) but no significant effect on major adverse cardiovascular events in all individuals (odds ratio, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.44-1.03]; P=0.07). In summary, these Mendelian randomization and clinical trial data support an effect of higher serum urate on increasing blood pressure, which may mediate a consequent effect on cardiovascular disease risk. High-quality trials are necessary to provide definitive evidence on the specific clinical contexts where urate lowering may be of cardiovascular benefit.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blood pressure; cardiovascular diseases; odds ratio; systematic review; uric acid

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33356394      PMCID: PMC7803439          DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.16547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   9.897


  31 in total

1.  Elevated uric acid increases blood pressure in the rat by a novel crystal-independent mechanism.

Authors:  M Mazzali; J Hughes; Y G Kim; J A Jefferson; D H Kang; K L Gordon; H Y Lan; S Kivlighn; R J Johnson
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 10.190

2.  Effect of Uric Acid Lowering on Renin-Angiotensin-System Activation and Ambulatory BP: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Ciaran J McMullan; Lea Borgi; Naomi Fisher; Gary Curhan; John Forman
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 8.237

3.  Effect of high-dose allopurinol on exercise in patients with chronic stable angina: a randomised, placebo controlled crossover trial.

Authors:  Awsan Noman; Donald S C Ang; Simon Ogston; Chim C Lang; Allan D Struthers
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 4.  Effect of uric acid-lowering therapy on blood pressure: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Li-Hui Qu; Hong Jiang; Jiang-Hua Chen
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2016-11-12       Impact factor: 4.709

5.  Re: "Multivariable Mendelian randomization: the use of pleiotropic genetic variants to estimate causal effects".

Authors:  Stephen Burgess; Frank Dudbridge; Simon G Thompson
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Using multiple genetic variants as instrumental variables for modifiable risk factors.

Authors:  Tom M Palmer; Debbie A Lawlor; Roger M Harbord; Nuala A Sheehan; Jon H Tobias; Nicholas J Timpson; George Davey Smith; Jonathan A C Sterne
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 3.021

7.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-07-21

8.  Interpreting findings from Mendelian randomization using the MR-Egger method.

Authors:  Stephen Burgess; Simon G Thompson
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 12.434

9.  Bias due to participant overlap in two-sample Mendelian randomization.

Authors:  Stephen Burgess; Neil M Davies; Simon G Thompson
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 2.135

10.  A comparison of robust Mendelian randomization methods using summary data.

Authors:  Eric A W Slob; Stephen Burgess
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 2.344

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Do thrifty genes exist? Revisiting uricase.

Authors:  Richard J Johnson; Laura G Sánchez-Lozada; Takahiko Nakagawa; Bernardo Rodriguez-Iturbe; Dean Tolan; Eric A Gaucher; Peter Andrews; Miguel A Lanaspa
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2022-10       Impact factor: 9.298

2.  Association Between Serum Uric Acid and Carotid Intima-Media Thickness in Different Fasting Blood Glucose Patterns: A Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Gao; Baofeng Xu; Yanyan Yang; Mei Zhang; Tian Yu; Qiujuan Zhang; Jianwei Sun; Rui Liu
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 6.055

3.  Establishment of a Nomogram Model for Predicting Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Events in Diabetic Nephropathy Patients Receiving Maintenance Hemodialysis.

Authors:  Xiaobing Liu; Caili Yan; Xiuxiu Niu; Jiechun Zeng
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 4.  Mini Review: Reappraisal of Uric Acid in Chronic Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Avi Goldberg; Fernando Garcia-Arroyo; Fumihiko Sasai; Bernardo Rodriguez-Iturbe; Laura Gabriela Sanchez-Lozada; Miguel A Lanaspa; Richard J Johnson
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 4.605

Review 5.  Excess comorbidities in gout: the causal paradigm and pleiotropic approaches to care.

Authors:  Hyon K Choi; Natalie McCormick; Chio Yokose
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 32.286

6.  Bayesian model comparison for rare-variant association studies.

Authors:  Guhan Ram Venkataraman; Christopher DeBoever; Yosuke Tanigawa; Matthew Aguirre; Alexander G Ioannidis; Hakhamanesh Mostafavi; Chris C A Spencer; Timothy Poterba; Carlos D Bustamante; Mark J Daly; Matti Pirinen; Manuel A Rivas
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 11.043

7.  An efficient and robust approach to Mendelian randomization with measured pleiotropic effects in a high-dimensional setting.

Authors:  Andrew J Grant; Stephen Burgess
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 5.899

8.  Independent association of plasma xanthine oxidoreductase activity with hypertension in nondiabetic subjects not using medication.

Authors:  Masato Furuhashi; Yukimura Higashiura; Masayuki Koyama; Marenao Tanaka; Takayo Murase; Takashi Nakamura; Seigo Akari; Akiko Sakai; Kazuma Mori; Hirofumi Ohnishi; Shigeyuki Saitoh; Kazuaki Shimamoto; Tetsuji Miura
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 3.872

Review 9.  Uric Acid-An Emergent Risk Marker for Thrombosis?

Authors:  Laura Țăpoi; Delia Lidia Șalaru; Radu Sascău; Cristian Stătescu
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 4.964

10.  Losartan and Eprosartan Induce a Similar Effect on the Acute Rise in Serum Uric Acid Concentration after an Oral Fructose Load in Patients with Metabolic Syndrome.

Authors:  Anna Masajtis-Zagajewska; Jacek Majer; Michał Nowicki
Journal:  J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 1.636

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.