| Literature DB >> 33154921 |
Abubakari I Sidiki1, Alexandr G Faybushevich2, Alexandr N Lishchuk3, Alexandr N Koltunov3, Ekaterina A Roshchina1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Physio ring (SR) is considered an improved version of the Classic rigid ring (RR). Today, SR is more widely used in mitral valve (MV) repair. We sought to compare the long-term outcomes of repair with RR and SR in degenerative mitral valve disease.Entities:
Keywords: Degenerative mitral valve disease; Mitral regurgitation; Mitral valve repair; Rigid ring; Semi-rigid ring
Year: 2020 PMID: 33154921 PMCID: PMC7640569 DOI: 10.37616/2212-5043.1027
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Saudi Heart Assoc ISSN: 1016-7315
Demographic data and mitral valve characteristics.
| Characteristics | Total | RR | SR |
|---|---|---|---|
| No. of patients (%) | 306 | 139 (45.4%) | 167 (54.6%) |
| Age, (mean y SD) | 71.2 ± 9.2 | 72.8 ± 9.5 | 69.6 ± 8.8 |
| Sex | |||
| Male | 233 | 109 (78.4%) | 124 (74.3%) |
| Female | 73 | 30 (21.6%) | 43 (25.7%) |
| Atrial fibrillation | 21 (6.9%) | 9 (6.5%) | 12 (7.2%) |
| MR | |||
| Grade 2 | 6 (2.0%) | 1 (0.7%) | 5 (3%) |
| Grade 3 | 147 (48.0%) | 82 (59%) | 65 (38.5%) |
| Grade 4 | 153 (50%) | 56 (40.3%) | 97 (57.4%) |
| NYHA Functional Class | |||
| I | 7 (2.3%) | 4 (2.9%) | 3 (1.8%) |
| II | 130 (42.5%) | 40 (28.8%) | 90 (53.9%) |
| III | 150 (49.0%) | 84 (60.4%) | 66 (39.5%) |
| IV | 19 (6.2%) | 11 (7.9%) | 8 (4.8%) |
| Diabetes mellitus | 16 (5.2%) | 7 (5.0%) | 9 (5.4%) |
| PA systolic pressure ≥40 mm Hg | 22 (7.2%) | 8 (5.8%) | 14 (8.3%) |
| Degenerative MVD (n,%) | |||
| Barlow | 92 (30.1%) | 38 (27.3%) | 54 (32.3%) |
| FED | 214 (69.9%) | 101 (72.7%) | 113 (67.7%) |
| Leaflet involvement (n,%) | |||
| Anterior | 29 (9.5%) | 7 (9.7%) | 22 (13.1%) |
| Posterior | 177 (57.8%) | 104 (74.8%) | 73 (43.7%) |
| Bi-leaflet | 100 (32.7%) | 28 (20.1%) | 72 (43.1%) |
| Leaflet condition (n,%) | |||
| Prolapse | 275 (89.9%) | 125 (89.9%) | 150 (89.8%) |
| Calcifications | 12 (3.9%) | 5 (3.6%) | 7 (4.2%) |
| Normal | 19 (6.2%) | 9 (6.5%) | 10 (6.0%) |
| Chordae (n, %) | |||
| Rupture | 184 (60.1%) | 84 (60.4%) | 100 (59.9%) |
| Elongations | 70 (22.9%) | 35 (25.2%) | 35 (21.0%) |
| Normal | 52 (17.0%) | 20 (14.4%) | 32 (19.2%) |
| Annulus (n,%) | |||
| Dilated, not calcified | 290 (94.8%) | 129 (92.8%) | 161 (96.4%) |
| Dilated, calcified | 11 (3.6%) | 7 (5.0%) | 4 (2.4%) |
| Not dilated | 5 (1.6%) | 3 (2.2%) | 2 (1.2%) |
RR, classic rigid ring; SR, physio semi-rigid ring; MR, mitral regurgitation; NYHA, New York Heart Association; PA, pulmonary artery; MVD, mitral valve disease; FED, fibroelastic deficiency.
Operative data.
| Characteristics | Total | RR | SR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minimally invasive | 36 | 15 | 21 | 0.122 |
| CPB (mean min±SD) | 80.0 ± 27.1 | 84,9 ± 21,0 | 97,5 ± 31,0 | 0.063 |
| Cross-clamp (mean min SD) | 54.3 ± 18.0 | 61.1 ± 19.8 | 57.5 ± 12.9 | 0.072 |
| Concomitant procedures | ||||
| TVR | 15 | 9 | 6 | – |
| Radiofrequency ablation | 21 | 9 | 12 | – |
| Valvuloplasty | ||||
| Segmental resection leaflet | 290 | 133 | 157 | – |
| Other leaflet interventions (patch, plicature) | 16 | 6 | 10 | – |
| Chordoplasty | ||||
| Chordal shortening | 70 | 35 | 35 | – |
| Chordal transfer | 13 | 7 | 6 | – |
| Chordal replacement with PTFE sutures | 57 | 27 | 30 | – |
| Without chordoplasty | 52 | 20 | 32 | – |
| Decalcification of the MA and leaflets | 11 | 7 | 4 | – |
| Mitral annulus reduction | ||||
| -By sliding leaflet technique | 215 | 93 | 122 | – |
| - By annulus plication | 10 | 0 | 10 | – |
| Ring size | ||||
| Smaller than 34 | 189 | 92 | 97 | – |
| 34 or larger | 117 | 45 | 72 | – |
Fig. 1A- Cumulative survival at 10 years (p = 0.177); B- 10-year freedom from reoperation (p = 0.167).
Postoperative outcomes.
| n, (%) | Total | RR | SR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 (1.3%) | 1 (0.3%) | 3 (1.0%) | 0.085 | |
| Mortality at 5yrs | 18 (5.9%) | 7 (2.3%) | 11 (3.6%) | 0.301 |
| Mortality at 10yrs | 47 (15.4%) | 21 (6.9%) | 26 (8.5%) | 0.177 |
| Recurrent MR ≥2+ at 5 yrs | 39 (12.7%) | 17 (5.6) | 22 (7.1%) | 0.071 |
| Recurrent MR ≥2+ at 10 yrs | 78 (25.5%) | 36 (11.8%) | 42 (13.7%) | 0.110 |
| Reoperation at 5 yrs | 12 (3.9%) | 7 (3.3%) | 5 (1.6%) | 0.281 |
| Reoperation at 10 yrs | 14 (4.6%) | 8 (2.6%) | 6 (2.0%) | 0.167 |
RR, classic rigid ring; SR, physio semi-rigid ring; CPB, cardiopulmonary bypass; TVR, tricuspid valve repair; PTFE, polytetrafluoroethylene.
Fig. 2A- 10-year freedom from recurrent MR ≥2+ (p = 0.110); B- Postoperative freedom from all major events such as death, reoperation or recurrent MR ≥2+ (p = 0.311).
Univariate and Multivariate Cox analysis.
| FOR REOPERATION AND MR ≥2+
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analysis | Hazard Ratio | CL 95% | |
| Barlow's disease | 2.12 | 1.15–3.03 | <0.001 |
| Preoperative MR = 4+ | 2.04 | 1.00–3.59 | 0.011 |
| Chordal shortening | 1.83 | 0.97–2.01 | 0.002 |
| Barlow's disease | 2.78 | 1.88–3.06 | 0.021 |
| Chordal shortening | 2.00 | 0.16–2.06 | 0.003 |
| Anterior or bileaflet involvement, | 1.62 | 0.97–1.98 | <0.001 |
| Leaflet and/or annular calcification. | 1.43 | 0.10–2.01 | 0.012 |
| NYHA functional class IV, | 1.59 | 1.06–2.12 | <0.010 |
| Old age (≥70 years) and Pulmonary artery systolic pressure (≥40 mm Hg) | 1.53 | 0.61–3.00 | 0.022 |
| Pulmonary artery systolic pressure (≥40 mm Hg) | 1.78 | 1.08–2.18 | 0.002 |
RR, classic rigid ring; SR, physio semi-rigid ring; MR, mitral regurgitation.
Left ventricular changes.
| RR
| SR
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preop | Postop | Last f/u | Preop | Postop | Last f/u | |
| LVEF (%) | 59.5 ± 7.8 | 53.5 ± 8.5 | 58.1 ± 10.0 | 61.2 ± 9.9 | 57.3 ± 5.8 | 60.1 ± 11.0 |
| LVESD (mm) | 47.3 ± 6.7 | 43.8 ± 8.8 | 38.5 ± 9.6 | 46.3 ± 9.9 | 42.0 ± 4.5 | 39.3 ± 6.1 |
| LVEDD (mm) | 59.7 ± 10.1 | 47.7 ± 7.6 | 47.0 ± 8.2 | 58.6 ± 9.7 | 49.9 ± 10.0 | 49.0 ± 6.6 |
| LAD (mm) | 53.1 ± 5.2 | 45.0 ± 2.6 | 44.5 ± 6.2 | 52.6 ± 9.2 | 44.6 ± 4.4 | 44.9 ± 7.2 |
MR, mitral regurgitation; NYHA, New York Heart Association, RR, classic rigid ring; SR, physio semi-rigid ring; Preop, Preoperative; Postop, postoperative (immediate); Last f/u, last follow-up; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; LVESD, left ventricular end-systolic dimension; LVEDD, left ventricular end-diastolic dimension; LAD, left atrial dimension.
All parameters were changed significantly (p < 0.001) between postoperative and last follow-up at serial examination by means of echocardiography. There were no significant differences between the 2 rings in each parameter (repeated-measures analysis of variance).