Literature DB >> 16401533

The Carpentier-Edwards Classic and Physio mitral annuloplasty rings: a randomized trial.

Ghada M M Shahin1, Geert J M G van der Heijden, Michiel L Bots, Maarten-Jan Cramer, Wybren Jaarsma, José C A Gadellaa, Aart Brutel de la Rivière, Henry A van Swieten.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinical and echocardiographic outcomes for the semi-flexible Carpentier-Edwards Physio and the rigid Classic mitral annuloplasty ring.
METHODS: Ninety-six patients were randomized for either a Classic (n = 53) or a Physio (n = 43) ring from October 1995 through July 1997. Mean follow-up was 5.1 years (range .1-6.6). We included standard patient characteristics at baseline and during follow-up. Analyses were adjusted for age and gender, and for factors that differed across groups at baseline. In 2002, echocardiography was performed in 74% of the survivors.
RESULTS: We found a 16% difference in mortality: 14% in the Physio group (n = 6) and 30% in the Classic group (n = 16) (adjusted P = .41). Life table analysis shows that the absolute risk of death after 30 months is lower in the Physio group. Intra-operative repair failure occurred in 3 patients (6%) of the Classic group, and in 4 (9%) of the Physio group, resulting in mitral valve replacement. Late failure occurred in 1 patient (2%) in the Classic group, and in 4 (9%) in the Physio group. At follow-up, left ventricular function did not differ across groups (ejection fraction 45% and 48% (adjusted P = .65)). The combined NYHA class III-IV had improved for the Classic group in 42% and for the Physio group in 34%.
CONCLUSION: Although the 16% difference in mortality did not reach statistical significance, it is considered clinically important. No differences in morbidity, valve function, and left ventricular function were found. Further research to explain the difference in mortality is required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16401533     DOI: 10.1532/HSF98.20051114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Surg Forum        ISSN: 1098-3511            Impact factor:   0.676


  5 in total

1.  Flexible or rigid ring in mitral annuloplasty-do the results differ?

Authors:  Varghese Thomas Panicker; Renjith Sreekantan; Sai Suraj Kotera
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-08-27

2.  The Carpentier-Edwards Classic and Physio Annuloplasty Rings in Repair of Degenerative Mitral Valve Disease: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Abubakari I Sidiki; Alexandr G Faybushevich; Alexandr N Lishchuk; Alexandr N Koltunov; Ekaterina A Roshchina
Journal:  J Saudi Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-05-20

3.  Three-dimensional echocardiographic analysis of mitral annular dynamics: implication for annuloplasty selection.

Authors:  Melissa M Levack; Arminder S Jassar; Eric K Shang; Mathieu Vergnat; Y Joseph Woo; Michael A Acker; Benjamin M Jackson; Joseph H Gorman; Robert C Gorman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Mid-term results of mitral valve repair using flexible bands versus complete rings in patients with degenerative mitral valve disease: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Alexandr V Bogachev-Prokophiev; Alexandr V Afanasyev; Sergei I Zheleznev; Vladimir M Nazarov; Ravil M Sharifulin; Alexandr M Karaskov
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 1.637

5.  Prevalence and Impact of Treatment Crossover in Cardiac Surgery Randomized Trials: A Meta-Epidemiologic Study.

Authors:  Mario Gaudino; Stephen E Fremes; Marc Ruel; Antonino Di Franco; Michele Di Mauro; Joanna Chikwe; Giacomo Frati; Leonard N Girardi; David P Taggart; Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 5.501

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.