Literature DB >> 33152098

Clinical and gated SPECT MPI parameters associated with super-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Claudio T Mesquita1, Amalia Peix2, Fernando de Amorim Fernandes3, Raffaele Giubbini4, Ganesan Karthikeyan5, Teresa Massardo6, Chetan Patel5, Luz M Pabon7, Amelia Jimenez-Heffernan8, Erick Alexanderson9, Sadaf Butt10, Alka Kumar11, Victor Marin12, Olga Morozova13, Diana Paez13, Ernest V Garcia14.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We sought to evaluate the behavior of cardiac mechanical synchrony as measured by phase SD (PSD) derived from gated MPI SPECT (gSPECT) in patients with super-response after CRT and to evaluate the clinical and imaging characteristics associated with super-response.
METHODS: 158 subjects were evaluated with gSPECT before and 6 months after CRT. Patients with an improvement of LVEF > 15% and NYHA class I/II or reduction in LV end-systolic volume > 30% and NYHA class I/II were labeled as super-responders (SR).
RESULTS: 34 patients were classified as super-responders (22%) and had lower PSD (32° ± 17°) at 6 months after CRT compared to responders (45° ± 24°) and non-responders 46° ± 28° (P = .02 for both comparisons). Regression analysis identified predictors independently associated with super-response to CRT: absence of previous history of CAD (odds ratio 18.7; P = .002), absence of diabetes mellitus (odds ratio 13; P = .03), and history of hypertension (odds ratio .2; P = .01).
CONCLUSION: LV dyssynchrony after CRT implantation, but not at baseline, was significantly better among super-responders compared to non-super-responders. The absence of diabetes, absence of CAD, and history of hypertension were independently associated with super-response after CRT.
© 2020. American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Heart failure; MPI; SPECT; cardiomyopathy; dyssynchrony; gated SPECT

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33152098     DOI: 10.1007/s12350-020-02414-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   3.872


  12 in total

1.  Electrocardiogram-gated single-photon emission computed tomography versus cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis; Thomas A Trikalinos; Peter G Danias
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-06-19       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Normalization of left ventricular ejection fraction after cardiac resynchronization therapy also normalizes survival.

Authors:  Mahesh Manne; John Rickard; Niraj Varma; Mina K Chung; Patrick Tchou
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 1.976

3.  Effect of Diabetes Mellitus on Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and to Prognosis in Heart Failure (from the Prospective Evaluation of Asian With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy for Heart Failure Study).

Authors:  Eugene S J Tan; Joevy Lim; Siew Pang Chan; Joshua Tze-Kiat Seow; Devinder Singh; Wee Tiong Yeo; Toon Wei Lim; Pipin Kojodjojo; Swee-Chong Seow
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Predictors of super-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy and associated improvement in clinical outcome: the MADIT-CRT (multicenter automatic defibrillator implantation trial with cardiac resynchronization therapy) study.

Authors:  Jonathan C Hsu; Scott D Solomon; Mikhail Bourgoun; Scott McNitt; Ilan Goldenberg; Helmut Klein; Arthur J Moss; Elyse Foster
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Clinical and gated SPECT MPI parameters associated with super-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Claudio T Mesquita; Amalia Peix; Fernando de Amorim Fernandes; Raffaele Giubbini; Ganesan Karthikeyan; Teresa Massardo; Chetan Patel; Luz M Pabon; Amelia Jimenez-Heffernan; Erick Alexanderson; Sadaf Butt; Alka Kumar; Victor Marin; Olga Morozova; Diana Paez; Ernest V Garcia
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 3.872

6.  Prognostic value of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony indices in long-standing type II diabetes mellitus with normal perfusion and left ventricular systolic functions on SPECT-MPI.

Authors:  Dharmender Malik; Bhagwant Rai Mittal; Ashwani Sood; Madan Parmar; Komalpreet Kaur; Ajay Bahl
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Diastolic dyssynchrony assessment by gated myocardial perfusion-SPECT in subjects who underwent cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Erick Alexanderson-Rosas; Nilda Espinola-Zavaleta; Ernest V Garcia; Amalia Peix; Teresa Massardo; Luz M Pabon; Neftali Eduardo Antonio-Villa; Isabel Carvajal-Juarez; Claudio T Mesquita; Amelia Jimenez-Heffernan; Chetan Patel; Ganesan Karthikeyan; Alka Kumar; Sadaf Butt; Mani Kalaivani; Victor Marin; Olga Morozova; Diana Paez
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Phase analysis of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT and cardiac resynchronization therapy: The good, the bad, and the ugly.

Authors:  Erito Marques de Souza Filho; Claudio Tinoco Mesquita
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Incidence and predictors of super-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Manoj Kumar Rohit; Darshan Krishnappa
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2019-09-09

10.  Predictors of super-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: the significance of heart failure medication, pre-implant left ventricular geometry and high percentage of biventricular pacing.

Authors:  Han Jin; Min Gu; Wei Hua; Xiao-Han Fan; Hong-Xia Niu; Li-Gang Ding; Jing Wang; Cong Xue; Shu Zhang
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.327

View more
  8 in total

1.  A method using deep learning to discover new predictors from left-ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony for CRT response.

Authors:  Zhuo He; Xinwei Zhang; Chen Zhao; Xing Ling; Saurabh Malhotra; Zhiyong Qian; Yao Wang; Xiaofeng Hou; Jiangang Zou; Weihua Zhou
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 3.872

2.  Clinical and gated SPECT MPI parameters associated with super-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Claudio T Mesquita; Amalia Peix; Fernando de Amorim Fernandes; Raffaele Giubbini; Ganesan Karthikeyan; Teresa Massardo; Chetan Patel; Luz M Pabon; Amelia Jimenez-Heffernan; Erick Alexanderson; Sadaf Butt; Alka Kumar; Victor Marin; Olga Morozova; Diana Paez; Ernest V Garcia
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 3.872

3.  Ventricular phase analysis moves on to the next phase: What technologists should keep in mind.

Authors:  Keiichiro Yoshinaga
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Incremental value of left ventricular shape parameters measured by gated SPECT MPI in predicting the super-response to CRT.

Authors:  Zhuo He; Fernando de Amorim Fernandes; Erivelton Alessandro do Nascimento; Ernest V Garcia; Claudio T Mesquita; Weihua Zhou
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 3.872

5.  Moving forward with motion reduction, detection and correction in cardiac PET.

Authors:  Ernest V Garcia; Jonathon A Nye
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2021-03-21       Impact factor: 3.872

6.  Mechanical Dyssynchrony with Gated Myocardial Perfusion SPECT: Reproducibility is the Key.

Authors:  Aaron Vigdor; Paco E Bravo
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 3.872

7.  Mechanical dyssynchrony and super-response to CRT.

Authors:  K A Jones; N E R Goodfield
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 3.872

8.  Atopic Dermatitis: Background, Objectives and Future Perspectives (Superresponders).

Authors:  Ricardo Ruiz-Villaverde; Javier Domínguez-Cruz; Francisco J Navarro-Triviño; Manuel Galán-Gutiérrez; Jose Carlos Armario-Hita; Jose Juan Pereyra-Rodriguez
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.