Literature DB >> 22698490

Predictors of super-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy and associated improvement in clinical outcome: the MADIT-CRT (multicenter automatic defibrillator implantation trial with cardiac resynchronization therapy) study.

Jonathan C Hsu1, Scott D Solomon, Mikhail Bourgoun, Scott McNitt, Ilan Goldenberg, Helmut Klein, Arthur J Moss, Elyse Foster.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The authors investigated predictors of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) super-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D) and whether super-response translated into improved event-free survival in patients with mildly symptomatic heart failure (HF).
BACKGROUND: Few data exist on predictors of super-response to CRT-D and associated morbidity and mortality in mildly symptomatic HF populations.
METHODS: Patients were assigned to CRT-D with paired echocardiograms at baseline and at 12 months (n = 752). Super-response was defined by the top quartile of LVEF change. Best-subset regression analysis identified predictors of LVEF super-response. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression were performed to investigate associations of response category with development of nonfatal HF event or all-cause death.
RESULTS: All 191 super-responders experienced an LVEF increase of ≥14.5% (mean LVEF increase 17.5 ± 2.7%). Six predictors were associated with LVEF super-response to CRT-D therapy: female sex (odds ratio [OR]: 1.96; p = 0.001), no prior myocardial infarction (OR: 1.80; p = 0.005), QRS duration ≥150 ms (OR: 1.79; p = 0.007), left bundle branch block (OR: 2.05; p = 0.006), body mass index <30 kg/m(2) (OR: 1.51; p = 0.035), and smaller baseline left atrial volume index (OR: 1.47; p < 0.001). Cumulative probability of HF or all-cause death at 2 years was 4% in super-responders, 11% in responders, and 26% in hypo-responders (log-rank p < 0.001 overall). In multivariate analysis, hyporesponse was associated with increased risk of HF or all-cause death, compared with super-response (hazard ratio: 5.25; 95% confidence interval: 2.01 to 13.74; p = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Six baseline factors predicted LVEF super-response in CRT-D-treated patients with mild HF. Super-response was associated with reduced risk of subsequent cardiac events. (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy [MADIT-CRT]; NCT00180271).
Copyright © 2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22698490     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.01.065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  66 in total

1.  Periprocedural management of cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  John Rickard; Niraj Varma
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2014-04

Review 2.  The year of 2012 in electrocardiology.

Authors:  Shlomo Stern
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.468

3.  Predictors and long-term outcome of super-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Abdul Ghani; Peter Paul H M Delnoy; Ahmet Adiyaman; Jan Paul Ottervanger; Anand R Ramdat Misier; Jaap Jan J Smit; Arif Elvan
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 2.882

4.  Assessment of coronary flow reserve predicts long-term outcome of responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Kunio Yufu; Hidekazu Kondo; Tetsuji Shinohara; Yumi Ishii; Seiichiro Yoshimura; Ichitaro Abe; Shotaro Saito; Akira Fukui; Norihiro Okada; Hidefumi Akioka; Yasushi Teshima; Mikiko Nakagawa; Naohiko Takahashi
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 5.  [Multipoint pacing-more CRT or a waste of battery power?]

Authors:  J Müller-Leisse; C Zormpas; T König; D Duncker; C Veltmann
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.443

6.  Outcome of super-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy defined by endpoint-derived parameters of left ventricular remodeling: a two-center retrospective study.

Authors:  David Hürlimann; Susann Schmidt; Burkhardt Seifert; Ardan M Saguner; Gerhard Hindricks; Thomas F Lüscher; Frank Ruschitzka; Jan Steffel
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 5.460

7.  Myocardial recovery after cardiac resynchronization therapy in left bundle branch block-associated idiopathic nonischemic cardiomyopathy: A NEOLITH II substudy.

Authors:  Norman C Wang; Aliza Hussain; Evan C Adelstein; Andrew D Althouse; Michael S Sharbaugh; Sandeep K Jain; Alaa A Shalaby; Andrew H Voigt; Samir Saba
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 8.  Recent advances in the optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Satish Chandraprakasam; Gina G Mentzer
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2015-02

Review 9.  Devices in the management of advanced, chronic heart failure.

Authors:  William T Abraham; Sakima A Smith
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 10.  The relationship between cardiac resynchronization therapy and diastolic function.

Authors:  Gregory F Egnaczyk; Eugene S Chung
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2014-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.