Literature DB >> 33151438

Acute and chronic effects of static stretching at 100% versus 120% intensity on flexibility.

Taizan Fukaya1,2, Shingo Matsuo3, Masahiro Iwata4,5, Eiji Yamanaka6, Wakako Tsuchida7, Yuji Asai4, Shigeyuki Suzuki8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The acute effects of static stretching have been frequently studied, but the chronic effects have not been studied concurrently. Thus, this study aimed to investigate both the acute and chronic effects of static stretching at different intensities on flexibility.
METHODS: Twenty-three healthy men were randomly assigned to perform 1 min of static stretching 3 days/week for 4 weeks at 100% intensity (n = 12) or 120% intensity (n = 11). The acute effects of stretching were assessed by measuring the range of motion (ROM), peak passive torque, and passive stiffness before and after every stretching session; the chronic effects of stretching were assessed by measuring these outcomes at baseline and after 2 and 4 weeks of stretching.
RESULTS: Compared with the 100% intensity group, the 120% intensity group had significantly greater acute increases in ROM after all 12 sessions, a significantly greater decrease in passive stiffness after 11 of 12 sessions, and a significantly greater increase in peak passive torque after six of 12 sessions. Regarding the chronic effects, ROM was significantly increased in both groups after 2 and 4 weeks of stretching. Peak passive torque significantly increased in the 100% intensity group after 2 and 4 weeks of stretching, and after 4 weeks in the 120% intensity group.
CONCLUSION: Stretching at 120% intensity resulted in significantly greater acute improvements in ROM, peak passive torque, and stiffness than stretching at 100% intensity. Four weeks of stretching increased ROM and peak passive torque but did not decrease passive stiffness, regardless of the stretching intensity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute effects; Chronic effects; Flexibility; Passive stiffness; Static stretching; Stretching intensity

Year:  2020        PMID: 33151438     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-020-04539-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  24 in total

1.  A stretching program increases the dynamic passive length and passive resistive properties of the calf muscle-tendon unit of unconditioned younger women.

Authors:  Richard L Gajdosik; Jennifer D Allred; Holly L Gabbert; Beth A Sonsteng
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Regular stretch does not increase muscle extensibility: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  M Ben; L A Harvey
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 4.221

3.  Muscle and joint responses during and after static stretching performed at different intensities.

Authors:  Sandro R Freitas; Ricardo J Andrade; Lilian Larcoupaille; Pedro Mil-homens; Antoine Nordez
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  A New Tool to Assess the Perception of Stretching Intensity.

Authors:  Sandro R Freitas; João R Vaz; Luis Gomes; Rui Silvestre; Edgar Hilário; Nuno Cordeiro; Filomena Carnide; Pedro Pezarat-Correia; Pedro Mil-Homens
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 5.  Can chronic stretching change the muscle-tendon mechanical properties? A review.

Authors:  S R Freitas; B Mendes; G Le Sant; R J Andrade; A Nordez; Z Milanovic
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 4.221

6.  Acute Effects of the Different Intensity of Static Stretching on Flexibility and Isometric Muscle Force.

Authors:  Satoshi Kataura; Shigeyuki Suzuki; Shingo Matsuo; Genki Hatano; Masahiro Iwata; Kazuaki Yokoi; Wakako Tsuchida; Yasuhiro Banno; Yuji Asai
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Are rest intervals between stretching repetitions effective to acutely increase range of motion?

Authors:  Sandro R Freitas; João R Vaz; Paula M Bruno; Maria João Valamatos; Ricardo J Andrade; Pedro Mil-Homens
Journal:  Int J Sports Physiol Perform       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 4.010

8.  Acute muscle and joint mechanical responses following a high-intensity stretching protocol.

Authors:  Sandro R Freitas; Ricardo J Andrade; Antoine Nordez; Bruno Mendes; Pedro Mil-Homens
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 3.078

9.  Effect of stretch frequency and sex on the rate of gain and rate of loss in muscle flexibility during a hamstring-stretching program: a randomized single-blind longitudinal study.

Authors:  Daniel J Cipriani; Megan E Terry; Michelle A Haines; Amir P Tabibnia; Olga Lyssanova
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 10.  The relevance of stretch intensity and position-a systematic review.

Authors:  Nikos Apostolopoulos; George S Metsios; Andreas D Flouris; Yiannis Koutedakis; Matthew A Wyon
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-18
View more
  2 in total

1.  Comparison Between High- and Low-Intensity Static Stretching Training Program on Active and Passive Properties of Plantar Flexors.

Authors:  Masatoshi Nakamura; Riku Yoshida; Shigeru Sato; Kaoru Yahata; Yuta Murakami; Kazuki Kasahara; Taizan Fukaya; Kosuke Takeuchi; João Pedro Nunes; Andreas Konrad
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 4.566

2.  Changes in stiffness of the specific regions of knee extensor mechanism after static stretching.

Authors:  Yuanchun Zhu; Yanan Feng; Fangchao Huang; Yapeng Li; Wenjing Wang; Xueqiang Wang; Xiangyang Cao; Zhijie Zhang
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-08-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.